Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home  Phrase:bangalore city civil court act

Mar 13 1987

Deepak Agencies Vs. Seethalakshmi Hall Flour Mills

  • Decided on : 13-Mar-1987

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1349

..... judges and the munsiff's courts established under the karnataka civil courts act, 1964 (karnataka act 21 of 1964) within the city of bangalore stood ..... , the district courts, the courts of the civil ..... : a city civil court was established for the city of bangalore under the provisions of the bangalore city civil courts ordinance, 1979, with effect from 16-11-1979. the ordinance was replaced by the bangalore city civil courts act, 1979 (in short 'the act of 1979'). section 3 of the act of 1979 provides that as from the appointed date there shall be a city civil court for the city of bangalore. with effect from the date of establishment of the city civil court .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jul 11 1990

Arun Enterprises Vs. Karnataka Agro Industries Corporation Ltd.

  • Decided on : 11-Jul-1990

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR2435

..... excluded the operation of the civil courts act in so far it covered the city of bangalore. in sub-section (2) of section 1 of the civil courts act ..... the city civil court. our reasons are as follows:-2. prior to 27-11-1980, the entire state of karnataka was governed by the karnataka civil courts act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the civil courts act). consequently, the courts existing in bangalore city were also governed by the civil courts act. however, on 27-11-1980, bangalore city civil court act, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as the city civil court act) came into force. the operation of the section 18(1) of the city civil courts act ..... . 13 of 1989 which came into force on 17th april 1989 read with section 12(1) of the bangalore city civil courts act, 1979. before that order came to be typed and signed by us, we noticed that the provisions contained in section 18 of the bangalore city civil court act had not been taken note of. therefore, we directed the appeal to be posted 'for being spoken to' on .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jan 14 1999

Sathya Shree Vs. M. Kumreshan

  • Decided on : 14-Jan-1999

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(5)KarLJ540

..... , 1979, means the court established under sub-section (1) of section 3 ..... principal civil court of original jurisdiction. hierarchy of the courts for administration of justice had been created by the constitution of the courts under the karnataka civil courts act, as well as by bangalore city civil court act with respect to the city of bangalore. karnataka state legislature enacted bangalore city civil court act, 1979. section 3 of the bangalore city civil court act, 1979 provides for the establishment of a city civil court for the city of bangalore. the city civil court under sub-section (3) of section 2 of the bangalore city civil court act .....

Tag this Judgment!
Oct 18 2001

Valliappa Software Technological Park (Private) Limited Vs. C. Sundara ...

  • Decided on : 18-Oct-2001

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR1476; 2002(1)KarLJ358

..... senior counsel for the respondent supporting the order of the court below submitted. bangalore city civil courts act, 1979 provides for establishment of city civil courts at bangalore. the city civil court is defined in section 2(3), whereas section 3(1) provides for establishment of city civil court for the city of bangalore. section 3(2) provides that such a city civil court shall consist of a principal city civil judge and other city civil judges as the state government may in consultation of ..... clear that ail the city civil courts constituted under the act are deemed to be principal city civil courts of original jurisdiction. the definition of judge makes it clear that there is no difference between principal city civil judge and city civil judge of the city civil court.11. however, only one principal city civil judge is constituted and other judges who preside over the city civil court would be additional judges. section 5 of the bangalore city civil courts act of 1979 which ..... the high court determine, and section 3(3) makes it clear that .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 27 2007

Abdul Wajid and Ors. Vs. A.S. Onkarappa and Ors.

  • Decided on : 27-Nov-2007

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR120; 2008(4)KarLJ573; 2008(1)KCCR116; 2008(2)AIRKarR25; 2008AIHC1615(Kar)

..... 5 of the specific relief act, 1963 providing for recovery of specific immovable property in terms ..... and a proper understanding of the provisions and the concept of court of small causes' as defined in section 2(b) of the karnataka small causes courts act, the definition of civil court' as defined in section 2(b)of the karnataka civil courts act, 1964 and the definition of 'city civil court' as understood in section 2(3) of the bangalore city civil courts act, 1979 which definition should be read in conjunction with section ..... of the provisions of the code of civil procedure as also the provisions of section .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jun 13 2000

A. Byanna Vs. Ramakrishnappa and others

  • Decided on : 13-Jun-2000

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2001(3)KarLJ28

..... the petition, as also to the map of the territorial jurisdiction of the bangalore city civil and sessions court published by the government for the purpose of fixing the territorial jurisdiction of the bangalore city civil court as defined by sub-section (aa) under section 2 of the bangalore city civil courts act, 1979, contended that the finding of the court below in its impugned order relating to its territorial jurisdiction is patently erroneous ..... time being included for the metropolitan area comprising the bangalore city declared in the section 8 of the cr. p.c., 1973 (central act 2 of 1974)'. city of bangalore is also defined by sub-section (aa) of section 2 of the karnataka civil courts act, 1964 (act of 1964). city of bangalore shall have the meaning assigned to it in the bangalore city civil courts act,1979.8. the said map published by the government ..... of karnataka under its notification no. law 247, lci 8037, dated 10-11-1980 indicates that the suit village 'horamavu agara' is located within the territorial limits of the jurisdiction of the bangalore city civil court. therefore, this indisputable .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 24 2005

Raipur Development Authority Vs. Sarin Construction Company

  • Decided on : 24-Mar-2005

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2006Chh12

..... ) & section 2(6) of bangalore city civil courts act of 1979 the high court held that 'the application under section 9 of the act of 1996 was filed in the city civil court no. 6 of bangalore. by virtue of the order passed by the high court the principal city civil judge has allotted all the arbitration proceedings filed in the city civil court of bangalore to 6th additional city civil judge who sits in the court hall no. 11, it ..... of the high court's order, the principal city civil judge passed an order whereby it was directed that all ..... is not a case of principal city civil judge entertaining the application under section 9 of the j act 1996 and then transferring the said application to the court of 6th additional city civil judge who sits in the court hall no. 11. therefore, as the: principal city civil judge and additional city civil judges were put on equal footing in view of the provistons bangalore city civil courts act of 1979 and also in view .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 22 2007

M.V. Ramachandrasa and Anr. Vs. Prakash Chand and Anr.

  • Decided on : 22-Nov-2007

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(1)KarLJ454; 2008(1)KCCR214; 2008(1)AIRKarR535; 2008(2)ICC569; 2008AIHC(NOC)459(Kar)

..... , 1979, by itself does not absolve the district court exercising jurisdiction under section 24 and for passing orders under section 24 of the code, the duties ..... court has observed while ordering w.p. no. 3799 of 2000 and while examining rejection of an application filed under section 10 in o.s. no. 2386 of 2005 that the writ petitioner would have possible regards to the provisions of section 24 of the cpc or section 12 of the bangalore city civil court act ..... court of principal city civil and sessions judge, bangalore in miscellaneous no. 320 of 2007, on the file of that court, a petition under section 24 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 filed by the respondents and as such petition is allowed under the impugned order and the original suit nos. 333 and 334 of 2005 were transferred from the court of cch xiii to the city civil court ..... -xxvii, transfer is on the premise that original suit no. 2683 of 2005 instituted by the defendants in o.s. nos. 333 and 334 of 2005 were pending before the transferred court and that the defendants ..... performance based on certain oral agreements in respect of immovable properties and a perusal of the plaint pleadings placed before the court by sri ashok kalyan, learned counsel for the respondents in this petition and the plaintiffs in two suits transferred, indicates that .....

Tag this Judgment!
Oct 12 2006

Smt. Sujatha Narayana and Ors. Vs. Smt. Leela Ramakrishna and Ors.

  • Decided on : 12-Oct-2006

Court : Karnataka

..... , there is no bar for the court below to try the issue along with other issues. the burden is on the plaintiffs ..... the pecuniary jurisdiction of the city civil court is not questioned, the issue on the point of determination of court fee can be tried along with other issues. further, section 11 of the cfsv act, 1958 was made keeping in view the pecuniary jurisdiction of the then munsiff (now civil judge (junior division)) and civil judge (now civil judge (senior division)). but, after the bangalore city civil court act, 1979 came into force ..... , section 11 of the cfsv act has not been amended. therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 05 2008

Veeragouda and Ors. Vs. Shantakumar @ Shantappagowda

  • Decided on : 05-Nov-2008

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR887

..... it. incidentally, the issue regarding court fee may also involve question of pecuniary jurisdiction. in answering the said issue, if the court holds that the subject matter of the suit is more than the value over which the ..... the order, the law mandates that the court shall reject the plaint, so that the precious time of recording evidence on other issues is saved and the defendant is not harassed in the form of trial. therefore, this section is based on good public policy and it has nothing to do with the bangalore city civil court act or its jurisdiction to try the suits before ..... issues is without any good ground.7. it is true that the city civil court at bangalore has unlimited jurisdiction whereas the civil courts situated outside the bangalore city are classified into civil judge, junior division and civil judge, senior division and pecuniary jurisdiction of those courts have been clearly stipulated in the karnataka civil courts act, 1964. the pecuniary jurisdiction defined in the said act is nothing to do with the power of the .....

Tag this Judgment!
Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //