Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home  Phrase:bureau of indian standards rules

Jul 02 2007

Everest Sanitation (India) and Anr. Vs. Delhi Jal Board and Ors.

  • Decided on : 02-Jul-2007

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT26

..... inspecting officers to make surprise inspections and take coercive action. further reliance has been placed upon section 33 which prescribes penalty for improper use of standard mark. it was also contended that in terms of bureau of indian standards rules, particularly, rules 10, 11 and 12, the licensees are permitted to affix the authorized mark on the products only after the bids is satisfied that its ..... inspecting the water meters itself at the stage of acceptance or insisting that at the stage of pre-tendering they should be tested by official agencies and/or agencies under rule 11 of the bureau of indian standards rules 1987.40. the petition is allowed to the above extent. no costs. ..... processes are in conformity with the prescribed standards. in the absence of any similar elaborate mechanism or a more detailed specific processes regarding water meters by ..... claim to hold valid licenses for use of isi standard mark, issued by the indian standards institution, by virtue of the indian standards institution (certification marks) act, 1952. it is averred that the use of isi standard mark is governed by the provisions of bureau of indian standards act, 1986 (hereafter referred to as 'bis') act as well as the rules and regulations framed under that act. the bids has .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 15 2005

Federation Of Packaged Drinking Water Manufacturers Vs. Union of India ...

  • Decided on : 15-Apr-2005

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2005Guj270; 2006FAJ265; (2006)1GLR528

..... with appeal and any person aggrieved by an order made under section 15 may prefer an appeal to the central government within such period as may be prescribed. rule-6 of the bureau of indian standards rules, 1987 deals with the powers of the executive committee and the executive committee shall perform, exercise and discharge such of the functions, powers and duties as may be ..... delegated to it by the bureau. rule-7 of the aforesaid rules, 1987 deals with establishment, publication and promotion of indian standards and since the rule-7 is relevant, the same is referred to and ..... further submitted that under section 37 of the act, the central government has made rules called 'bureau of indian standards, 1987'. rule-7 of the said rules provide for establishment, publication and promotion of indian standards and sub-rule (6) of rule-7 prescribes procedure for establishment of the indian standards. it is also further submitted that bureau of indian standards in exercise of the powers conferred by section 38 of the act, has made .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 30 2004

Krishna Foods and Acqua Minerals Vs. Government of India, Ministry of ...

  • Decided on : 30-Sep-2004

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD338; 2004(6)ALT4

..... also contended that the procedure prescribed for making compulsory use of standard mark for articles and process to certain schedule ..... necessary amendments to the pfa rules. it was also contended that the rule making authority did not follow the procedure prescribed under the provisions of the pfa act before the rules, were promulgated. it was also contended that as per rule 7(7) of the bureau of indian standards rules, 1987 (for short 'bis rules'), it is optional for the industries to get the bureau of indian standards certification.7. it was ..... industries was not followed by the respondents before making applicable to 'packaged drinking water'. section 14 of the bureau of indian standards act .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 21 2008

Bureau of Indian Standards Vs. Pepsico India Holdings P. Ltd. and Anr. ...

  • Decided on : 21-Nov-2008

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 155(2008)DLT588

..... clause 7.2 of is 14543 : 2004 have been formulated by the bureau under the bureau of indian standards act 1986 read with the rules and regulations framed there under, state as under:7.2 labelling prohibitions 7.2.1 no claims concerning medicinal (preventative, alleviative or curative) effect shall be ..... that the decision of the central government whether a question is one of policy or not would be final.12. rule 49(28) of the pfa rules mandates that the packaged drinking water cannot be sold without the certification mark of bureau of indian standards. in our view the jurisdiction of the appellant bis is attracted as the respondent no. 1 admittedly sells packaged ..... public about the nature, origin, composition and properties of such waters put on sale is prohibited. (iii) rule 49 (28) of the pfa rules provides as under: (28) no person shall manufacture, sell or exhibit for sale packaged drinking water except under the bureau of indian standards certification mark. (d) hence, in consonance with the above provisions of law, the labeling prohibitions in ..... water.(b) he laid emphasis on the genesis of power and authority of bureau of indian standards (bis). the jurisdiction of bis is not only with regard to laying down standards but also labelling. to strengthen his argument he emphasized on the provisions of law under the various acts and rules. bis is empowered under section 10(1)(a) of the bis act, .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 17 1989

Sadar Bazar Electrical Traders Association and Ors. Vs. Union of India ...

  • Decided on : 17-Nov-1989

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 40(1990)DLT251

..... both. the property in respect of which the contravention has taken place shall be forfeited to the bureau as maybe directed by the court trying the contravention of the aforesaid provisions.(10) bureau of indian standards rules 1987, ('bis rules' for short)have been framed by the central government in exercise of powers under. 37 of the ..... secretary, ministry of industry, department, of industrialdevelopment; (2) development commissioner, small scale industries; (3)bureau of indian standards; and (4) delhi administration through the joint director (electrical).(3) bureau of indian standards ('bis' for short) is constituted under the bureau of indian standards act 1986 (for short 'the his act')' the bids act has been enacted to provide for the establishment ..... the country are taken into account and to this extent the proposed draft is modified from the original international standard. the preliminary draft is examined critically by the concerned sectional committee of the bureau of indian standards consisting of experts in the related area of technology and representatives of all concerned interests, for required changes/ ..... of a bureau for the harmonious development of the activities of standardisation, marking and quality .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jul 22 2013

M/S KUTCH BRINE CHEM INDUSTRIES Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

  • Decided on : 22-Jul-2013

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... officer as contained in section 25, the penalty for using improper standard mark as contained in section 33, the requirement of the rule which contemplates payment of a fee for using the standard mark and establishment of laboratories for sampling of products with standard mark as contained in section 10 of the bureau of indian standards rules, 1987 and argued that when a product is marked with an ..... isi marking which is given on the basis of form no.1 under regulation 3 of the bureau of indian standards (certification) regulations, 1988, certain 8 statutory duty is imposed upon the supplier to ..... maintain a particular standard and certain checking and inspecting powers are .....

Tag this Judgment!
May 20 2011

The Electrical Inspector, GEIG’s Office Campus Vs. M.P.Apartment ...

  • Decided on : 20-May-2011

Court : Tamil Nadu - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) - Chennai

..... 1999 the renewal of license was not granted in view of the non provision of imperforated doors as per the conditions of the lift act and bureau of indian standard rules. hence the district forum order to be set aside against the 2nd opposite party. 8. in this appeal, appeal against 2nd respondent is ..... pointed out by the 2nd opposite party at the earliest point of time they would have compelled the 1st opposite party to comply with the rules and regulations. while considering these aspects the 2nd opposite party has stated already those defects were pointed out in exhibit a16 and as the act ..... party filed version and contended inter alia that the imperforated doors could not be provided due to non availability of suitable shaft dimensions as per is rules and regulations which was informed to the complainant by letter dated 22.06.1999. the 2nd opposite party granted license on 30.4.99. the ..... 1st opposite party is not in accordance with the tamil nadu lift rules and regulations. the lift was not provided with imperforated doors and the 2nd opposite party after inspecting the lift on 22.3.99 called upon ..... . the 1st opposite party furnished the quotation dated 9.4.1998 and after payment, lift was erected and commissioned without following the tamil nadu lift rules and regulations. the 2nd opposite party is an electrical engineer who has issued license to the lifts erected by competent person. the lift provided by the .....

Tag this Judgment!
May 08 2006

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Bureau of Indian Standards an ...

  • Decided on : 08-May-2006

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT522

..... packaged drinking water as per notification duly gazetted by ministry of health and family welfare.10. by virtue of rule 49(28) of the pfa rules, 1955 no person shall manufacture, sell or exhibit for sale packaged drinking water except under the bureau of indian standards certification mark. clause 7.2 of is 14543:2004 stipulate as under:7.2 labelling prohibitions.7.2.1 ..... properties of drinking water is prohibited.11. mr. jos chiramel, learned counsel for the bureau, has reiterated the asseverations in the counter affidavit to the effect that 'the parameters thus provided in the indian standard, which is at par with entry a- 33 of appendix b of the pfa rules, only provides for maximum permissible limits of abovementioned limits. hence merely because the petitioner ..... the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the bureau details of the specifications or amendments made to the required standards of packaged drinking water have been spelt out. the pfa rules were amended by the ministry of health vide gazette notification dated 18.7.2003, effective from 1.1.2004, in respect of pesticide residues. the indian standard packaged drinking water (other then packaged natural .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 24 2006

Bureau of Indian Standards Vs. Bureau of I.S. Employees Assoc.

  • Decided on : 24-Nov-2006

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 137(2007)DLT376

..... mukul mudgal1. this letters patent appeal challenges the judgment dated 18th september, 2002 of the learned single judge granting parity in the pay scales of the respondent no. 1, bureau of indian standards (bis) laboratory employees association who are the technical assistants with the appellant. by the impugned judgment the learned single judge restored the parity of pay scales of the technical assistants ..... january, 1986.(c) by a notification dated 15th january, 1998, the appellant framed the bureau of indian standards (terms and conditions of service of employees) regulations 1988, wherein it was stated that the central government service (classification, control and appeal rules) 1965, shall apply to the employees of the bureau and they shall enjoy all the benefits enjoyed by the employees of the central government ..... , on 21st january 1991, in the seniority list the members of the appellant were downgraded as group - 'c' after the implementation of the 4th pay commission's recommendations in the bureau.(f) a writ petition (cwp 1663/96) was filed in respect of assistant and stenographers. the writ petition was allowed on 21st april 1999. against the said writ petition the .....

Tag this Judgment!
May 20 2010

Bottled Water Processors Association Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. ...

  • Decided on : 20-May-2010

Court : Delhi

..... , taken by respondent no. 4 if any of those units were found operating without a valid licence. learned counsel for respondent no. 5, the director general, bureau of indian standards states that his affidavit is ready and will be filed during the course of the day with advance copy to learned counsel for other parties.list on 8th march 2010 ..... india ('uoi') through the secretary, ministry of health & family welfare (respondents 1 and 3), the director general, prevention of food adulteration ('pfa')(respondent no. 4) the director general, bureau of indian standards ('dg, bis') (respondent no. 5) and the lieutenant governor of delhi representing the government of national capital territory of delhi ('gnctd') (respondent no. 2) and the commissioner of ..... rules by mention of rule 49(28) makes the use of a bis mark for packaged drinking water mandatory. therefore, it is also a mandatory requirement under section 14 of the bis act. the words 'indian standard' under section 2(g) of the bis act have been defined as under:indian standard means the standard (including any tentative or provisional standard) established and published by the bureau ..... bureau or by any officer empowered in this behalf by the government....'18. it is plain to this court that on a collective reading of the above rules, it is mandatory for packaged drinking water to be manufactured, sold or exhibited for sale only with a bis certification mark. packaged drinking water has to conform to the stipulated indian standards .....

Tag this Judgment!
Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //