Skip to content


Options Dock ▼

Judgment Search Results Home > Search Phrase: constitution scheduled castes order amendment act Page 1 of about 17,399 results (0.725 seconds)

Jul 17 2013 (HC)

Dr.Jyoti Hyankey Vs. Union Public Service Commission

Court : Delhi

..... ) scheduled castes order, 1962 the constitution (pondicherry) scheduled castes order, 1964@ the constitution (uttar pradesh) scheduled tribes order, 1967@ the constitution (goa, daman and diu) scheduled castes order, 1968@ the constitution (goa, daman and diu) scheduled tribes order, 1968 the constitution (nagaland) scheduled tribes order, 1970@ the constitution (sikkim)scheduled castes order, 1978@ the constitution (sikkim) scheduled castes order, 1978, the constitution (sikkim) scheduled castes order, 1978, the constitution (jammu and kashmir) scheduled tribes order, 1989 @ the constitution (sc) order (amendment) act, 1990@ the constitution (st) order (amendment) act, 1991@ the constitution(st) order (second amendment) act, 1991@ the constitution(scheduled castes) order (amendment) act, 1991 the constitution (scheduled castes) order (amendment) act, 2002 @ the constitution scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 2002@ the constitution(scheduled castes) order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 2008 (TRI)

Phool Singh S/O Late Shri Tej Singh Vs. the Director General, Employee ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) - Delhi

..... a tribe which has been declared, under any of the following orders, to be a scheduled caste or a schedule tribe for the area of which he/she is a resident: (i) constitution (scheduled castes) orders, 1950; the constitution (scheduled tribes) order, 1950; ...the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1976; the constitution (scheduled tribes) order (amendment) act, 1987; the constitution (scheduled tribes) order amendment act, 1991 and the constitution (scheduled tribes) order second amendment act, 1991. (xiv) the constitution (scheduled casts) orders (amendment) act, 1990. from above, it is clear that a person can be ..... said to be a scheduled caste / scheduled tribe, if he is declared so under any of the orders as mentioned above. there is no mention .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2014 (SC)

R. Unnikrishnan and anr Vs. V.K. Mahanudevan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of kerala.26. the legal position has since the pronouncement of this court in pattika jathi s case (supra) undergone a change on account of the amendment of the presidential order in terms of the constitution (scheduled castes) order amendment act, 2007 which received the assent of the president on 29th august, 2007 and was published in the official gazette on 30th august, 2007. the ..... act, inter alia, made the following change in part viii kerala for entry 61: 61. thandan (excluding ezhuvas and thiyyas who are known as thandan, in the ..... known as thandan who was a native of cochin and malabar region of the state could not be withdrawn as the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950 did not make a distinction between the two categories of thandans till the amendment act of 2007 for the first time introduced such a difference.29. that apart the question of ouster of ezhuvas and thiyyas ..... a true and correct construction of the expression thandan appearing in the constitution (scheduled castes) order 2007 did not include ezhuvas and thiyyas known as thandan and assuming that the two were different at all relevant points of time, the fact that the position was not clear till the amendment act of 2007 made a clear distinction between the two would entitle .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2005 (HC)

Madhavi Vs. State Election Commission

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(3)KLT275

..... not be treated as scheduled caste unless the presidential order was amended.12. a perusal of the above judgment rendered by the division bench clearly shows that the validity ..... synonym of mannan could not be sustained since the presidential order had excluded peruvannan and included only mannan and vannan as sl.no. 17 in act 61 of 2002. the division bench further held that peruvannan is not included in the 1950 presidential order or the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1976 or in the constitution (scheduled caste) orders (second amendment) act, 2002. thus the division bench only held that peruvannan could ..... . is on record as ext.p-1.4. the scrutiny committee constituted under act 11 of 1996 held that respondent no. 2 belonged to peruvannan community and therefore she had to be treated as a scheduled caste. the order passed by the scrutiny committee is on record as ext.p-2. ext.p-2 order was challenged by the petitioner before this court in m.f .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 2012 (HC)

Babu T.G. and Others Vs. the Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2012(3)ILR(Ker)528; 2012(3)KLT709

..... and the present palakkad district, the benefits due to a scheduled caste included in the schedule to the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950 as amended upto date and to issue them community certificates accordingly. 10. long after the said judgment was delivered, the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950 was amended by the constitution (scheduled castes) order (amended) act, 2007, (act 31 of 2007), whereby entry 61 in part viii of the schedule was substituted as follows:- 61.) thandan (excluding ezhavas and ..... the apex court in palghat jilla thandan samudhaya samrakshana samithi v. state of kerala, (supra), thandans in malabar are entitled to all the benefits of the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950 till part viii of the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950, was amended by act 31 of 2007. still later, a learned single judge of this court considered the very same issue in raveendranath p. v. state of kerala and ..... petitions as well. 4. the main contention raised in the writ petitions is that as per entry 37 in part viii of the schedule to the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950, as amended by act 51 of 2002, pathiyan community is recognised as a scheduled caste throughout the state of kerala along with mannan, perumannan, vannan and velan, that in view of such inclusion it is not open to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2004 (HC)

Amol Narayan Wakkar and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(2)ALLMR16; 2005(2)BomCR853; 2005(1)MhLj798

..... including those belonging to the erstwhile malabar district and the present palghat district, the benefits due to scheduled caste included in the schedule to the constitution scheduled castes order as amended upto date and to issue to them community certificates accordingly. the decision in palghat thandan's was cited with ..... , 1950 referred to above. schedule iii of the 1950 order dealing with bombay state was amended by act no. 63 of 1956. schedule iii to act no. 63 of 1956 deals with amendments to the constitution (scheduled tribes) order, 1950 ..... to the claimant or not. it was observed that the notification issued by the president under article 342 of the constitution, subject to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1976 was conclusive and final. indeed in our view these observations support petitioners contention rather than the respondents. the ..... scheduled tribes so far as regards members thereof residing in the localities specified in relation to them respectively in those parts of that schedule. thus so far as the erstwhile bombay state was concerned, 'thakur' was declared to be scheduled tribe.5. on 25th september 1956, the parliament enacted the scheduled caste and scheduled tribes order (amendment) act, 1956, amending the constitution (scheduled tribes) order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1985 (HC)

Srish Chandra Choudhury Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... schedule part hi was tripura and a list was appended to it. in sl. 15 was tripura or tripuri, 'tippera' in the same line. the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1976 amended the entry by removing the word 'or' and putting a comma instead ..... and the constitution (scheduled tribes) order, 1950. in the fourth ..... (modification), order, 1956 where no. 15 included tripura or tripuri, tippera. the constitution (seventh amendment) act, 1956 amended article 1 of the constitution and the first schedule. tripura, which immediately before the commencement of the constitution was being administered as if it were a chief commissioner's province under the name of tripura became a union territory. section 26 of the north-eastern areas (reorganisation) act, 1971 amended the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1997 (SC)

Vinay Prakash and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT1997(3)SC206; (1997)3SCC406; [1997]2SCR97; 1997(1)LC638(SC)

..... made adding to or deleting from the lists certain castes. in entry 20 of the entries in relation to the state of bihar, lohara was wrongly ..... 342(1) of the constitution read with article 366(25), notified the scheduled tribes for the state of bihar thus: 'such tribe or tribal communities or parts of or groups within such tribes or tribal communities as are deemed under article 342 to be scheduled tribes for the purposes of this constitution,' thereafter, the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, 1976 came to be ..... the government on january 6, 1995. in the meanwhile, there was spate of litigation after the 1976 amendment act and the lohars - a backward class - as stated earlier, claimed the status of scheduled tribes. when the said claims for social status of scheduled tribes came to be rejected, the petitioner approached the courts. while the desired social status certificates were ..... for the parliament to make necessary amendments in article 342(2) of the constitution and it is not for the executive government but for the court to interpret the rules and construe as to whether a particular caste or a tribe or a part or section thereof is entitled to claim the status of scheduled tribes, under these circumstances, we .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2012 (HC)

Deepak Kumar and Others Vs. District and Sessions Judge, Delhi and Oth ...

Court : Delhi

..... scheduled caste and schedules tribes notified under the presidential notification. the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950, the constitution (scheduled tribes) order, 1950 and the constitution (scheduled castes) (union territories) order, 1951, constitution (scheduled castes) (union territories) order, 1951, constitution (scheduled tribes) (union territories) order, 1951 were the first presidential notifications issued under article 341 and article 342 of the constitution of india specifying scheduled castes and tribes in relation to various states and union territories. the order of 1950 was amended by the constitution (scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order), amendment act, 1956, (act ..... 63/1956). another amending act was enacted by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2013 (HC)

Dhnurdhari Shivwanshi Chhatriya Samaj Sewa Trust ( Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

..... .4 as a one group) as per the constitution scheduled castes & scheduled tribes orders, (amendment), scheduled tribe certificates are being issued to 4 scheduled castes listed at column no.2 to as a act, 1976 (page * hindi version of no.1394, partconstitution scheduled xiii rajasthan) castes & scheduled tribes orders, (entry si no.4 as (amendment), act, a group) hindi 1976 (page no.647, version of part 1- rajasthan) constitution scheduled castes & scheduled tribes orders, (amendment) act, 1976 (page no.658, part iirajasthan) prior ..... to year 1976 the dhanak, dhanuk and dhankia (s.no.20&21) were claiming and have obtained caste certificates as scheduled castes but after promulgation of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes order (amendment) act, 1976, these sc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //