Skip to content


Options Dock ▼

Judgment Search Results Home > Search Phrase: karnataka labour welfare fund act Page 1 of about 1,687 results (0.065 seconds)

Mar 16 2005 (HC)

Life Insurance Corporation of India Respdt. by Its Divisional Manager ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2005(106)FLR777]; ILR2005KAR2701; 2005(5)KarLJ564

..... cause notices and demand notices issued by the respondent-labor inspectors under the provisions of the karnataka shops and commercial establishment act, 1961 (for short 'act of 1961) r/w the karnataka shops and commercials establishment rules, 1963 (for short 'rules of 1963) and the karnataka labour welfare fund act, 1965 (for short 'act of 1965'). the parties being common and common questions of fact and that of law having ..... be read as 'under', whereby the petitioner stands excluded from the application of the said act.the writ petitions are allowed and it is declared that the establishment of the petitioner is exempt from the application of the provisions of karnataka labour welfare fund act, 1965 and the karnataka shops and commercial establishments act, 1961 and the rules 1963. the impugned show cause notices and demand notices stand ..... the aforesaid pleadings, it is contended that the provisions of the act of 1965 and the act of 1961 read with the rules of 1963, have no application to the petitioner, although petitioner admits that one of its branches at chintamani, by an erroneous understanding of law made payment to the welfare fund. hence these writ petitions.4. the respondents have opposed the petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1997 (HC)

General Beedi Works, Puttur and anr. Vs. Provident Funds Inspector, Ma ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1998)ILLJ983Kant

..... conditions imposed in the order of promotion. the government of karnataka through the secretary to the department of social welfare and labour department issued a notification empowering all the provident funds officers and enforcement officers of the office of the regional funds commissioner of karnataka to act as such. in my opinion, the complainant who was appointed ..... as the enforcement officer by the competent authority was empowered to act under the act including initiation ..... is not the enforcement officer, reliance is placed by the prosecution to ex. p-6 which is the order passed by the regional provident funds commissioner, karnataka wherein 3 head clerks of the department were promoted to the post of enforcement officers with effect from assumption of charge purely on a temporary ..... of prosecution against those who have contravened the provisions of section 14 of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1997 (HC)

M/S. General Beedi Works, Puttur, Dakshina Kannada District and Anothe ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2000(2)KarLJ86

..... conditions imposed in the order of promotion. the government of karnataka through the secretary to the department of social welfare and labour department issued a notification empowering all the provident funds officers and enforcement officers of the office of the regional funds commissioner of karnataka to act as such. in my opinion, the complainant who was appointed ..... as the enforcement officer by the competent authority was empowered to act under the act including initiation ..... 1 is not the enforcement officer, reliance is placed by the prosecution to ex. p-6 which is the order passed by the regional provident funds commissioner, karnataka, wherein 3 head clerks of the department were promoted to the post of enforcement officers with effect from assumption of charge purely on a temporary ..... of prosecution against those who have contravened the provisions of section 14 of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1996 (HC)

Jayaben Suryakant Modi Vs. Welfare Commissioner and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1996)3GLR60; (1997)ILLJ139Guj

..... labour welfare fund act, 1953. he has taken me through the preamble of the bombay labour welfare fund act. 1953 as also section 3, section 7 and section 19 of the said act and has submitted that this act was enacted to promote the welfare of the labour in the state of gujarat and for conducting such activities and the gujarat labour welfare board constituted under section 4 of the act deals with the fund called 'labour welfare fund ..... . mr. bhaya has placed strong reliance on the following decisions : 1. (1981-i-llj-354) (state of punjab v. labour court, jullundur) a decision of the supreme court. 2. (1985-ii-llj-63) (regional provident fund commissioner v. regional labour commissioner) a decision of karnataka high court. 3. (1986-i-llj-323) (municipal corporation of delhi v. v. t. naresh and another) a decision ..... impediment against the right of receiving gratuity under the payment of gratuity act, 1972. high court of karnataka has also taken the same view with reference to the provisions of section 14 in the case of regional provident fund commissioner v. regional labour commissioner (supra) and has held that the provisions of gratuity act have an overriding effect over the service regulations providing for non .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 1988 (SC)

Coffee Board, Karnataka, Bangalore Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1988SC1487; (1988)2CompLJ161(SC); JT1988(2)SC448; 1988(1)SCALE1055; (1988)3SCC263; [1998]Supp1SCR348; [1988]70STC162(SC)

..... insertion of clause 29a in article 366. this definition is prospective in operation. subsequent to 3rd of february, 1983, the karnataka sales tax act was amended by act 10 of 1983, act 23/1983 and act 8/1984. the definition of 'sale' in section 2(t), however, was not amended. that definition was amended with ..... the state, at the same rate at which tax would have been leviable on the sale price of such goods under section 5 of the karnataka act. the delivery of coffee by the coffee growers to the coffee board not being treated a purchase by the board, the state did not ..... of forms, sale is a transfer of property in the goods by one, the seller, to the other, the buyer.15. under the karnataka sales tax act, sale is defined under section 2(t) as:'sale' with all its grammatical variations and cognate expressions means every transfer of the property in ..... some. this decision in our opinion concludes all the issues in the instant appeal.20. in 1970 purchase tax was introduced. the karnataka sales tax act was amended by karnataka act 9 of 1970 and section 6 was substituted. the new section 6 provided for the levy of purchase tax on every dealer ..... from out of appropriations made by the parliament annually. this fund was to be utilised for meeting the costs of administration, research, measures for the welfare of plantation labour, promotion of coffee consumption and developmental assistance to coffee estates. after the coffee act was enacted the production of coffee and the quantities exported .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 2005 (HC)

Hayath Khan Vs. the Deputy Labour Commissioner and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2006(108)FLR632]; ILR2005KAR6001; 2006(1)KarLJ365

..... do this job. the inspectors appointed would see that for each child employed in violation of the provisions of the act, the concerned employer pays rs. 20,000/- which sum could be deposited in a fund to be known as child labour rehabilitation-cum-welfare fund.'11. in these circumstances, i am of the view that the impugned order cannot be found fault with in ..... allowed. petitioner filed his written arguments. first respondent thereafter has chosen to pass the an order imposing rs. 20,000/ as compensation to be deposited to the district child labour rehabilitation and welfare fund in terms of annexure-g dated 31-3-2005. a recovery notice was also issued in terms of annexure-h dated 30-7-2005. petitioner in these circumstances is ..... matters there cannot be any rigid or strict enquiry as in other cases. there are social welfare measures and it is in the larger interest of child labour. i cannot but recall what the supreme court has stated while deciding the minimum wages act in ministry of labour and rehabilitation v. tiffin's barytes asbestos and paints ltd. in the said judgment, the court ..... before me.2. i made a specific request to sri subba rao, learned senior counsel to assist the court in the case on hand, in the absence of the child labour .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2004 (HC)

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, by the Vice Chairman and M ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(1)KarLJ333; (2005)IILLJ219Kant

..... is the akila karnataka rajya raste sarige nowkarara mahamandali which is a registered trade union of workmen working in the corporation.4. the ..... 2. the appellants-3 and 2 in writ appeal nos. 3463 and 3464 of 2001 are the karnataka state road transport corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'corporation'), and bangalore metropolitan transport service respectively. the 3rd appellant is the chief labour and welfare officer of the corporation.3. the appellant in writ appeal nos. 3856 to 3857 of 2001 ..... section 3 of the road transport corporation act with a view to provide efficient, economical and properly coordinated transport services to the members of the public in ..... in writ appeal nos. 3463 to 3464 of 2001 is the karnataka state road transport corporation staff and workers federation. the 2nd respondent is an employee and conductor in the corporation and was also the secretary of the road transport corporation employees' death-cum-retirement benefit fund. the corporation and metropolitan transport service have been constituted under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2006 (HC)

Delhi Jal Board Vs. Workman of the Erstwhile Delhi Water Supply and Se ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 127(2006)DLT722; 2006(87)DRJ536; (2006)IIILLJ144Del

..... )iillj1094sc , the supreme court observed:-4. recently dealing with such scheme or project employees in s.m. nilajkar and ors. v. telecom, district manager, karnataka, this court observed. it is common knowledge that the government as a welfare state floats several schemes and projects generating employment opportunities, though they are short-lived. the objective is to meet the need of the moment ..... for fulfilling the need of such passing-phase-projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer-state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favor of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to the state for floating such schemes and the state may opt to keep away from initiating such schemes and projects ..... end because the need for the project comes to an end either because the need was fulfilled or the project had to be abandoned wholly or partially for want of funds, the employer cannot by a writ of mandamus be directed to continue employing such employees as have been dislodged, because such a direction would amount to requisition for creation of ..... posts though not required by the employer and funding such posts though the employer did not have funds available for the purpose.6. in jaipal and ors. v. state of haryana, the employees of the project of adult and non-formal education, a temporary .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2003 (SC)

Surendra Kumar Sharma Vs. Vikas Adhikari and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR1655; [2003(97)FLR1169]; [2003(4)JCR32(SC)]; 2003(2)JKJ430[SC]; JT2003(4)SC564; (2003)IILLJ1094SC; RLW2003(4)SC547; 2003(5)SCALE4; (2003)5SCC12; 2003(1)SLJ147(S

..... dealing with such scheme or project employees in s.m. nilajkar and ors. v. telecom, district manager, karnataka - : (2003)iillj359sc this court observed - 'it is common knowledge that the government as a welfare state floats several schemes and projects generating employment opportunities, though they are short-lived. the objective is to meet ..... passing-phase-projects or schemes were to become a liability on the employer-state by too liberally interpreting the labour laws in favour of the workmen, then the same may well act as a disincentive to the state for floating such schemes and the state may upto to keep away from ..... knew it well that his employment was co-terminus with the scheme. thepost against which the appellant worked has been abolished for want of funds and has ceased to exist. as held above thepanchayat samiti was not even an employer of the appellant.9. the learned single judge rightly ..... the project comes to an end either because the need was fulfilled or the project had to be abandoned wholly or partially for want of funds, the employer cannot by a writ of mandamus be directed to continue employing such employees as have been dislodged, because such a direction would ..... amount to requisition for creation of posts though not required by the employer and funding such posts though the employer did not have funds available for the purpose.6. in jaipal and ors. v. state of haryana, : air1988sc1504 , the employees of the project .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2005 (HC)

Venkatramani N. Vs. Indian Bank Rep. by Its Chairperson and M.D. and a ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2005)IIILLJ703Mad; (2005)3MLJ614

..... law that in matters of welfare legislation, especially involving labour, the terms of contracts and the provisions of law should be liberally construed in favour of the weak....'17. in the judgment reported in regional provident funds commissioner, punjab v. shibu metal works (supra), the hon'ble supreme court, while dealing with the provisions of employees provident funds act, observed as under in 1965 ..... court also in the judgment reported in international ore and fertilizers (india) pvt. ltd. v. employees' state insurance corporation : (1988)illj235sc by stating that 'in the field of labour and welfare legislation, the provisions have to be broadly and liberally construed'. again in the judgment reported in workmen of binny ltd. v. management of binny ltd. and anr. (supra) the ..... (1965)illj473sc , union of india and anr. v. hansoli devi and ors. : [2002]supp2scr324 and also 1930 all er (rep) 503 (hl).15. in the judgment reported in state of karnataka v. vishwabharathi house building co-op. society and ors. (supra), the hon'ble supreme court while dealing with the constitutional validity of some of the provisions of consumer protection ..... a period of 15 years.14. our above referred to interpretation of regulation 18 also finds support from the judgments of the hon'ble supreme court reported in state of karnataka v. vishwabarathi house building co-op. society and ors. : [2003]1scr397 , workmen of binny ltd. v. management of binny ltd. and anr. : (1985)iillj564sc , regional .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //