Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home  Phrase:karnataka land revenue act 1964 section 95  Page:6

Sep 26 1999

C. Kenchappa and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

  • Decided on : 26-Sep-1999

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2000(4)KarLJ1

... Karnataka Land Revenue Act which governs about the land revenue in the State provides that a gomal land cannot be changed for any other purpose, except with prior permission of the authority concerned. Under Section 71 of the KLR Act, power is given to the Deputy Commissioner to reduce or increase the gomal land (grazing land) according to the exigencies of requirement for providing house sites to weaker sections ... land by weaker sections of the people and SCs/STs and assign the land to them. But, there is no power to the Deputy Commissioner to allot the agricultural land or gomal land to industrial purpose without conversion as provided under Sections 95 and 97 of the KLR Act. It is also to be noticed here that Section 95 of the KLR Act is amended. Section 95 ... Land Revenue Act by virtue of Section 47 of the Act, which reads as follows:'47. Effect of provisions inconsistent with other laws: Theprovisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law.The provision of Section 47 of the Act must be given over-riding effect vis-a-vis the provisions of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act ...

Nov 17 2000

K. Ramaswamy Vs. The Assistant Commissioner, Mysore Sub-Division, Myso ...

  • Decided on : 17-Nov-2000

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2001KAR748

... land within the green belt area for other purposes. The said decision is rendered while considering the provisions of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act in conjunction with the provisions of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act and the said decision deals with the limitations envisaged for grant of permission in accordance with the urban development plan and comprehensive development prepared under Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act ... of Karnataka v Jayashree, wherein it has been held that there can be no permission to divert the agricultural land within the green belt area for other purposes. The said decision is rendered while considering the provisions of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act in conjunction with the provisions of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act and ... it is observed that the State has failed to produce any material to show the issuance of notification under Section 95(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. This infers that there is no notification as such issued under Section 95(3) declaring the green belt areas concerning each city and town in the State.8. The Government Pleader ... Act.7. On the other hand the Counsel for the respondent in Writ Petition No. 34573 of 2000 relied on the unreported ruling of this Court in W.P. Nos. 17658 and 17659 of 1999. In the said case it is observed that the State has failed to produce any material to show the issuance of notification under Section 95(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act ...

Dec 16 2003

K.T. Venkatappa, since deceased by his LRs. and Ors. Vs. The Land Trib ...

  • Decided on : 16-Dec-2003

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR1471

... and under Section 44 read with Section 2(18), the land goes outside the purview of the Act of 1961. It is his contention that the application for conversion having been made on 14.9.1970 which was received on 16.9.1970, the land should be deemed to have been converted four months after the date of application under Section 95(5) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. The Deputy ... considered by the Land Tribunal in the light of the specific case made out by the second respondent that he is a tenant of the lands in question for 20 years prior to 1974,. He, therefore, contends that the presumption under Section 133 of the Land Revenue Act, 1964 does not arise as there is inconsistency between the statement made and the pahani entries. The Land Tribunal is ... , contends that the presumption under Section 133 of the Land Revenue Act, 1964 does not arise as there is inconsistency between the statement made and the pahani entries. The Land Tribunal is only required to notice the entry for the relevant date which is 1.3.1974 and if as on that date it is shown to the satisfaction of the Land Tribunal that the tenant was ... the Land Revenue Act, 1964 does not arise as there is inconsistency between the statement made and the pahani entries. The Land Tribunal is only required to notice the entry for the relevant date which is 1.3.1974 and if as on that date it is shown to the satisfaction of the Land Tribunal that the tenant was in possession and cultivation of the lands, then ...

Jun 22 1995

Munimasthaiah Vs. State of Karnataka

  • Decided on : 22-Jun-1995

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2323; 1996(1)KarLJ57

... land or on tank bed;(iv) unauthorised constructions made in the area specified as green belt in the comprehensive development plan or outline development plan prepared under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 (Karnataka Act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under Sub-section (3A) of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964; (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964),(v) unauthorised constructions made by any person on the land ... Act, 1961 (Karnataka Act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under Sub-section (3A) of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964; (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964),(v) unauthorised constructions made by any person on the land belonging to another person over which former has no title;(vi) unauthorised construction having more than two floors including the ground floor;(vii) unauthorised constructions made in violation of Urban (Land Ceiling and Regulation) Act ... Karnataka Act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under Sub-section (3A) of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964; (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964),(v) unauthorised constructions made by any person on the land belonging to another person over which former has no title;(vi) unauthorised construction having more than two floors including the ground floor;(vii) unauthorised constructions made in violation of Urban (Land Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (Central Act ...

Feb 08 1995

Raju Reddy Vs. Commissioner, BDA

  • Decided on : 08-Feb-1995

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2514; 1995(4)KarLJ475

... Act, 1961 (Karnataka Act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under Sub-section (3A) of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964; (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964);(v) unauthorised constructions made by any person on the land belonging to another person over which former has no title;(vi) unauthorised construction having more than two floors including ground floor;(vii) unauthorised constructions made in violation of Urban (Land Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (Central Act ... land or on tank bed;(iv) unauthorised constructions made in the area specified as green belt in the comprehensive development plan or outline development plan prepared under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 (Karnataka Act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under Sub-section (3A) of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964; (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964);(v) unauthorised constructions made by any person on the land ... Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 (Karnataka Act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under Sub-section (3A) of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964; (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964);(v) unauthorised constructions made by any person on the land belonging to another person over which former has no title;(vi) unauthorised construction having more than two floors including ground floor;(vii) unauthorised constructions made in violation of Urban (Land ...

Mar 30 1998

N. Sampurnamma and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

  • Decided on : 30-Mar-1998

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1998(6)KarLJ332

... land or on tank bed; (iv)unauthorized constructions made in the area specified as green belt in the comprehensive development plan or outline development plan prepared under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 (Karnataka Act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under sub-section (3-A) of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964); (v) unauthorized constructions made by any person on the land ... Act, 1961 (Karnataka Act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under sub-section (3-A) of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964); (v) unauthorized constructions made by any person on the land belonging to another person over which former has no title; (vi)unauthorized constructions having more than two floors including ground floor; (vii)unauthorized constructions made in violation of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act ... Karnataka Act 11 of 1963) or declared as green belt under sub-section (3-A) of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (Karnataka Act 12 of 1964); (v) unauthorized constructions made by any person on the land belonging to another person over which former has no title; (vi)unauthorized constructions having more than two floors including ground floor; (vii)unauthorized constructions made in violation of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (Central Act ...

Nov 27 1991

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Vishwa Bharathi House Building Co- ...

  • Decided on : 27-Nov-1991

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR4407; 1992(1)KarLJ523

... conversion under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 ('the L.R. Act') is necessary, and further, that, the Society need not seek exemption under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 ('the Land Ceiling Act'). ... Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act is necessary in respect of Sy. Nos. 26, 28, 29 and 30 of Avalahalli village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore, for which the petitioner had made an application to the Bangalore Development Authority, for approval of a lay-out under Section 32 of the Act;(3) Declare that no order of exemption under Section 20 of the Urban Land ... Karnataka Land Revenue Act is necessary in respect of Sy. Nos. 26, 28, 29 and 30 of Avalahalli village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore, for which the petitioner had made an application to the Bangalore Development Authority, for approval of a lay-out under Section 32 of the Act;(3) Declare that no order of exemption under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act ... Section 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 ('the Land Reforms Act'). Hence, the transactions are unlawful, null and void, notwithstanding the permission to purchase the land accorded by the City Improvement Trust Board (predecessor authority to the Bangalore Development Authority) which cannot validate such transactions;(2) that, the nature of the land being agricultural, conversion of the same for non-agricultural purpose under Section 95 ...

Nov 08 2010

Shamalsha Girdhari Mineral Co. Vs. The State of Karnataka

  • Decided on : 08-Nov-2010

Court : Karnataka

... land which was also described in the revenue records as agricultural land. Despite the fact that the land was described as agricultural land, the petitioner commenced quarrying activities over the three pieces of land referred to herein above, without seeking conversion thereof for non-agricultural use in terms of the provisions of Section 95(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act ... revenue records as agricultural land. Despite the fact that the land was described as agricultural land, the petitioner commenced quarrying activities over the three pieces of land referred to herein above, without seeking conversion thereof for non-agricultural use in terms of the provisions of Section 95(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act). Since the respondents did not insist on the non-eonversion of the land ... Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act). Since the respondents did not insist on the non-eonversion of the land at the hands of the petitioner before the same came to be used for quarrying of pink granite, the petitioner did not suffer any consequences.3. In respect of each of the quarrying licenses granted to the petitioner, the petitioner surrendered the entire land ...

Oct 28 2010

MR. Mohammed Baseer Ahmed S/O Late Mohammed Salar Vs. Assistant Revenu ...

  • Decided on : 28-Oct-2010

Court : Karnataka

... the layout wherein the site is situate had been formed in accordance with law, more particularly after obtaining conversion of the agricultural land to residential purpose as contemplated under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 or appropriate permission under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961.4. The learned counsel for the appellant however sought to contend that in respect of similarly situated properties, the respondent ... charges, by such time, there was already an amendment to the Act, 1964 on 11.12.2000 as indicated in the endorsement and noticed by the learned Single Judge. Further, the notification dated 02.01.2007 had also clarified this aspect with regard to the impediment to grant khatha in respect of revenue sites. In this background, what is also to be noticed ... issued by the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike indicating that the khatha cannot be issued on collecting the betterment charges since the site had been formed without conversion of the agricultural land for residential purpose. The learned Single Judge while upholding the action of the respondents has rejected the writ petition by order dated 21.07.2009.3. Though the learned counsel ...

Jan 17 2011

N. Nanjappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka Represented By Its Secretary an ...

  • Decided on : 17-Jan-2011

Court : Karnataka

... section 95(5) of the Karnataka land Revenue act and etc.,) 1. Misc W No 328 of 2011 for early hearing is allowed and the writ petition is taken up for hearing. 2. Writ jurisdiction is not meant for issue of declaration in favour of a private person even assuming reliance is placed on some statutory provisions such as sub-section 5 of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 ... Karnataka land Revenue act and etc.,) 1. Misc W No 328 of 2011 for early hearing is allowed and the writ petition is taken up for hearing. 2. Writ jurisdiction is not meant for issue of declaration in favour of a private person even assuming reliance is placed on some statutory provisions such as sub-section 5 of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 [for short, the Act ... assuming reliance is placed on some statutory provisions such as sub-section 5 of Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 [for short, the Act]. 3. The present petition is by a person who, it appears had applied for conversion of his agricultural land for non-agricultural use to an extent of 4 acres ... Karnataka Land Revenue Act and other allied laws like the Land Reforms Act, PTCL Act, Land Grant Rules, Land Acquisition Act, etc. 7. As soon as the application is received by the Tahsildar, the same shall be verified by the Tahsildar. He shall verify the following: (i) Only the occupant of the land has filed the application. (ii) The conversion will not defeat any of the following laws, in particular: (a) Sections ...

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //