Skip to content


Feb 21 2013 (HC)

The District Registrar D C Office Building Shimoga District and Anothe ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of the notified government value. 3. after inviting our attention to the aforesaid observations, learned aga submits that these observations are not consistent with the provisions of the karnataka stamp act, 1957 and the rules framed thereunder and the observations made in the judgment of the supreme court in state of punjab and others vs mohabir singh (air 1996 ..... 6. in this backdrop, we have considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties. the government of karnataka has published a market value guidelines as provided for in section 45-b of the karnataka stamp act, 1957 (for short the act) and the rules framed thereunder. the guidelines, as referred to in para-9 of the order, are notified government ..... values under the karnataka stamp (constitution of central valuation committee for estimation, publication and revision of market value guidelines of properties) rules ..... 2003 (for short the rules). 7. section 45-b of the act and rule 6 of the rules clearly indicate that the market values notified by .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jan 29 2013 (HC)

Channaibhairayya Vs. the Commissioner Bangalore Development Authority ...

Court : Karnataka

..... receipt of consideration and placing the holder of the power of attorney in possession of immovable property, does not conform to the mandate of registration law and payment of stamp duty under the karnataka stamp act, 1957. petitioner having not pleaded the execution of a conveyance deed by the vendor-in-title except for the execution of the gpa-annexure a and an affidavit annexure ..... is stated that respondent-bda issued a preliminary notification dated 14.12.2001 for acquisition of lands to form a layout known as sir m visveswaraiah layout published in the karnataka gazette dated 24.1.2012 and yet another preliminary notification dated 15.4.2002, while the final notification was published in the gazette on 23.5.2002. since the land ..... convey title nor create any interest in an immovable property. they cannot be recognized as deeds of title, except to the limited extent of section 53a of the tp acttp acttp act. such transactions cannot be relied upon or made the basis for mutations in municipal or revenue records. this rule applies not only to deeds of conveyance in regard to freehold .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 18 2013 (HC)

M/S. Archana Associates (R) a Partnership Firm by Its Managing Partner ...

Court : Karnataka

..... not be supplied by the payment of such duty and penalty. the only defect that is cured is the duty with penalty attracted under the karnataka stamp act, 1957 was collected. this by itself would not enable the court to act upon an unregistered document which was compulsorily registerable. therefore, the same having been marked in evidence, would not advance the case of the appellant ..... a period 30 years in respect of the property was admitted and therefore, the suit could not have been decreed, the question is whether the trial court was bound to act on the admission by the plaintiff in this regard. no doubt it is laid down under order xii rule 6 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 that, where admissions ..... admitted by the plaintiff. in that light of the matter, the plaintiff having sought to rely upon yet another agreement which was for a lesser term and the court having acted on the second agreement which was not produced and marked in evidence, did not entitle the plaintiff to any such decree. 4. since the only contention that the appellant seeks .....

Tag this Judgment!
Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //