Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka value added tax act section 15 Page 7 of about 87,442 results (0.396 seconds)

Dec 11 1992 (HC)

Bangalore Water Supply and Sewarage Board Vs. Dr. T.K. Puttaswamy Gowd ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR278; 1993(1)KarLJ122

..... of allahabad on the ground that the regulations which designated different officers of the board as appointing authorities among other things, contrary to the provisions of section 15 of the said act were ultra vires of the said act. dealing with that aspect, the supreme court in the decision in u.p. state electricity board v. abdul sakoor hashmi and ors., : air1981sc1708 has observed ..... provisions of section 12 of the act and section 79(k) of the said act is anologous to the provisions of section 88(1)(f) of the act. in the case dealt with by the ..... power of the board under section 12 of the act. in fact, the supreme court had an occasion to deal with a similar question. the supreme court had an occasion to deal with the provisions referred to in section 79(k) and section 15 of the electricity supply act. at this juncture, it may be mentioned here that section 15 of the said act is pari materia with the ..... appeals, the learned attorney general fairly left the final outcome on the question of fact untouched because he was more concerned with a correct construction of section 79(k) read with s. 15 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and the validity of regulations framed by the u.p. state electricity board on december 18, 1970 in exercise of the powers conferred by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 1994 (HC)

C. Muniyappa Vs. Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1994KAR3652; 1994(5)KarLJ169

bharuka, j1. the petitioner assails the order dated 15.4.1993 passed by the first respondent-assistant commissioner in r.a.no.101/1989-90 ,(annexure-l) on the ground that on the facts, the appeal was not maintainable under the provisions of section 136(2) of the karnataka revenue act, 1964 (for short, the act).2. the foundational facts leading to the controversy may ..... appeal preferred against annexure-k was very much maintainable before the assistant commissioner because section 136(2) of the act on its very language permits preferring of an appeal against certification of entries under section 129(6) of the act. .4. chapter xi of the act read with chapter ix of the karnataka land revenue rules, 1966 deals with the record of rights. under the ..... scheme of the act, any information received by the prescribed authorities either from the persons interested or the statutory ..... authorities as envisaged under section 128 of the act, with regard to the acquisition of any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 1998 (HC)

M/S. Vyalikaval House Building Co-operative Society, Bangalore Vs. Smt ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ143

..... this court considered the report of the joint registrar of co-operative societies in the case of narayana reddy and another v state of karnataka and others. afterconsideration of the aforesaid report and various decisions with reference to each of the case, this court concluded in that case as ..... and to the knowledge of the petitioners no awards have been passed and the petitioners or the predecessors in title have received sections 9 and 10 notices nor section 12 notices with regard to acquisition of their lands. the petitioners were served with a notice issued by the city civil court ..... relevant facts. the irresistable inference flowing from the facts and circumstances of these cases is, whereas the power conferred under the land acquisition act is for acquiring lands for carrying out housing scheme by a housing society, in each of the cases the acquisition of lands is not ..... the expense of the writ petitioners and others similarly situated. the lands, the subject-matter of the present litigation, had been acquired under the act vide final notification issued on 21st of february, 1986. such an acquisition was challenged in various writ petitions including w.p. nos. 17775 and ..... . 8194 of 1987.the writ petitioner in that case had challenged the acquisition made by the state government under the land acquisition act, 1894 (for short the 'act') insofar as it related to her property. similarly, in other writ petitions the respondents herein had challenged the acquisition with respect to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 2002 (HC)

Subashchand JaIn Vs. Ganapathi and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003ACJ1005; ILR2002KAR3355; 2002(4)KarLJ433

..... it requires enhancement.7. per contra sri hegde mulkhand, learned counsel for the insurance company submits that the tribunal has awarded a sum of rs. 47,000/-towards injuries and adding a further sum of rs. 20,000/- for pain and sufferings and on this count itself the tribunal has awarded a sum of rs. 67,000/- and as such no ..... nature of injuries sustained by the claimant, the period of hospitalisation, medical expenses incurred etc., awarded compensation as under:towards injuries ... ... rs. 47,000/-(comprising of rs. 15,000/- for fracture of femur, rs. 15,000-for fracture of mandible, rs. 7,000/- for fracture of nasal bone, rs. 7,000/- for fracture of noso eluamoidal and rs. 3,000/- for two .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 2008 (HC)

Shivanna Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009CriLJ215; 2008(5)KarLJ551

..... for our consideration is:whether there is any illegality in the judgment and order of the trial court in convicting the accused for the offence under sections 498-a, 307 and 302 of the ipcipcipc?5. it is the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that except the interested ..... not led any defence evidence. the trial court on appreciation of the material on record convicted the appellant for the offence under sections 498-a, 307 and 302 of the ipcipcipc and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also further sentenced for other offences and ordered ..... the deceased submitted his written complaint (ex. p. 12). as mahadeva was dead by that time p.w. 15 returned to the police station and registered crime no. 108 of 2000 for the offence under sections 498-a, 302 and 307 of the indian penal code, 1860 and sent the complaint (ex. p. 12) ..... 4-6-2000 he arrested the accused and as his clothes were blood-stained, he seized the clothes (m.os 8 and 9) under mahazar (ex. p. 15). on interrogation, the accused volunteered to produce the weapon. he recorded the statement of the accused (ex. p. 16) who led the police and the attesting witnesses ..... accused.during the trial, the prosecution led the evidence by examining p.ws. 1 to 15 and got marked exs. p. 1 to 16 and m.os. 1 to 9. the statement of the accused was recorded under section 313 of the criminal procedure codecriminal procedure codecriminal procedure code, 1973. he has taken defence of total denial and has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1952 (HC)

P. Krishnaiah Setty Vs. A.V. Lakshmana Rao and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1952Kant139; AIR1952Mys139

..... upon in the order is -- 'benoy krishna das v. salsiccioni' , which is a decision based on the application of section 110 of the transfer of property act section 110 of the transfer of property act runs thus:'where the time limited by a lease of immoveable property is expressed as commencing from a particular day, in computing ..... from 1st of august and 6th august respectively and it is not contested that the. notices were not received clear 15 days before the expiry of the months of tenancy. section 106, t. p. act provides that in the absence of a contract to the contrary lease of immoveable property shall be deemed to be a ..... notice was given by the tenant on 1-2-28 that he would give up possession on 1-3-28. it was contended that under section 110. t. p. act the first day of the commencement of the period should be excluded. the subsequent period of tenancy it was argued thus began on the 2nd ..... similar in both the cases. in the single order relating to both the cases, the learned appellate judge has reasoned as under:'under section 106 of the transfer of property act one important requirement of a valid notice is that it must designate proper time for determination of the tenancy. this time again must be ..... lease from month to month in case of a dwelling house and shops terminable on the part of either the lessor or the lessee by 15 days' notice .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1953 (HC)

Papiahachary Vs. Gurusamappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1954Kant149; AIR1954Mys149; (1955)33MysLJ58

..... the plaintiff in o. s. no. 224 of 43-44 and that payment must be deemed to be the payment on behalf of the judgment-debtor for purposes of section 20, limitation act. in the first place this point has not been relied upon in the execution application and in the second place it cannot be said under any circumstances that the ..... as an application for a revival of the previous execution case dismissed for statistical purposes and not as a fresh execution application for purposes of articles 181 and 182, limitation act. we need refer only to -- 'venkate gowda v. mudli setty', 19 mys lj 82 (a) and the case law referred to in it.3. it is contended that since execution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 1955 (HC)

Bangalore City Municipality Vs. Managing Agents, N. Sirur and Co. Ltd. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1955Kant147; AIR1955Mys147

..... page 245 quotes from a decision the passage: 'every bye-law is a law, and is obligatory to all persons bound by it, that is within its jurisdiction as any act of parliament, only with this difference, that a bye-law is liable to have its validity brought in question'. in -- 'white v. morley', (1899) 2 qb 34 (a) at p ..... not be repugnant to the law and the bye-law should not be repugnant to the rule or the law. the rule cannot be attacked as being repugnant to the act or as being in excess of the power of the government to make it but the bye-law provides for what is beyond the limits laid down by the rule ..... for any purpose' in the bye-law after the word 'power' is not found in the rule. it was notified in ex. a dated 15-1-1940 that the bye-laws would come into force from 15-2-1940. long prior to this date, the defendants started the mills; and had electric installation provided for working the mills. the question therefore is ..... 'instal' anything means establishing it and has reference to the stage or times when it comes into existence, to the initial act and not continuance of what is done previously. the same word in a similar provision of the madras municipalities act has been interpreted to relate to what is done at the inception. see -- 'muthu balu chettiar v. chairman madura municipality .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1958 (HC)

F.M. Subbayya Vs. Venkataramana Subrao Barkur

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1959Kant145; AIR1959Mys145

..... suits. the more fact that the procedure is different does not affect the nature of the jurisdiction exercised by the court. that jurisdiction is the special jurisdiction conferred by section 28 of the act. the mere fact that a suit is tried according to the procedure applicable to small cause courts cannot convert that suit into a small cause suit, the order ..... cause courts. i am afraid, this is not a correct way of reading this provision. section 28 of the act deals with original jurisdiction under the act and section 29 deals with appellate jurisdiction under the act. appeals under section 29 are provided against original orders passed under section 28. clause (a) of section 29(1) referring to the court of small causes, bombay, describes it as a ..... a special set or hierarchy of tribunals specially empowered to deal with or adjudicate upon the lights and obligations created by the special act. very often when such tribunals are set up by the special act, the act itself contains a section imposing a bar on the jurisdiction of ordinary civil courts in respect of matters specially placed within the competence of the tribunals ..... indicate the procedure to be followed by a court of civil judge, junior or senior division. the general scheme of these rules is that in respect of matters of the value below a specified amount and certain smaller matters the procedure of a small cause court is to be followed and in other matters the procedure of a court of first .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 1959 (HC)

Rudrappa Fakirappa Sankannavar Vs. Mallangouda and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1960Kant227; AIR1960Mys227; ILR1960KAR336

..... at any rate it became an excess payment on that day and the suit having been instituted on 16-2-1950 the same is within time. article 82 of the 'act' reads as follows:'by a surety against a co-surety three years. when the surety pays anything in excess of his own share.' according to sri malimath, the payment made ..... . the present suit was filed on 16-2-1950.(3) the courts below have held that the suit is barred by limitation. they have held that article 82 of the 'act' governs the facts of the case. this conclusion is not open to challenge. but the point in controversy is, whether the cause of action arose on 22-11-1946 when ..... (1) the scope of article 82 of the indian limitation act (which shall be hereinafter called the 'act') comes up for consideration in this appeal.(2) the facts proved are: the second defendant borrowed in 1926 a sum of rs. 2,000/- from the gajanan urban co-operative .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //