Skip to content


Options Dock ▼

Judgment Search Results Home > Search Phrase: mines and minerals development and regulation act 1957 Page 1 of about 2,752 results (0.080 seconds)

May 07 2007 (HC)

Misrilall JaIn and Sons and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR2042; [2007(3)JCR292(Jhr)]

..... of m.p. v. mahalaxmi fabric mills ltd and ors. (1995) suppl. 1 scc-642.31. in d.k. trivedi case (supra) the constitutionality of section 15(1) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and the power of state government to make rules under section 15 to enable them to charge dead rent and royalty in respect of the lease of minor ..... terms of the aforesaid resolution.3. in all the writ petitions, petitioners' case is that they were time to time, granted mining lease as per the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (in short mmdr act), mineral concession rules, 1960 (in short mc rules) and bihar minor mineral concession rule now, jharkhand minor mineral concession rules 2004 (in short mmc rules) in respect of major and minor ..... minerals. petitioner's case is that being holder of mining leases for minerals, they are paying all statutory levies, royalty and surface rent as specified .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2007 (HC)

Sri H.G. Rangangoud S/O Late H.R. Gaviappa Vs. Ministry of Coal and Mi ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(1)KarLJ1992007(4)KCCRSN257; 2007(5)AIRKarR534; AIR2007NOC2435

..... cl 16 mmm 2003 dated 15-3-2007. the notification was issued under rule 59 of the mineral concession rules, 1960 [for short, the rules], which in turn is the rules framed under the provisions of the mines & minerals (development & regulation) act, 1957 [for short, the act].2. it appears that the writ petitioner in wp no. 20739 of 2005 m/s salgaocar ..... mining industries pvt ltd., had filed an application in form no. 1 and had sought for grant of mining lease in respect of an extent of 524.80 ..... has been preempted by the impugned notification, a notification issued by the central government in exercise of its power under section 17a(1a) of the mines and minerals (development & regulation) act, 1957 [for short, the act]. it is aggrieved by the intervention of the impugned notification, the present writ petitions, questioning the legality of the notification.the notification is challenged mainly ..... 2003sq 889 (e)- in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1a) of section 17a of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957), the central government in consultation with the government of karnataka, reserves for undertaking mining operations through the state trading corporation of india ltd. (stcil), a public sector undertaking, owned and controlled by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2007 (HC)

Sesa Goa Limited Rep. by Its Secretary and G.M. (Corporate Affairs) C. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3266; 2008(1)KarLJ16ILR2007(3)Kar3266; 2007(3)KCCRSN207; 2007(5)AIRKarR9; AIR2007NOC2115

..... , 1960, upon the respondent no. 2.30. therefore, it is necessary to examine whether sub-section (2) of section 26 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 confers such power to the state government. section 26 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 reads thus:26. delegation of powers.-(1) the central government may, by notification in the official gazette, direct that any power exercisable by ..... no. 2. he seeks to justify such exercise of powers referring to sub-section (2) of section 26 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. according to him all powers conferred and duties to be performed by the state government under mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 could be delegated by the state government upon any other authorities or officers subordinate to it. exercising that power conferred ..... or ail such powers exercisable by it (the central government or the state government) under 'the act' (mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957) be exercisable by the officers or authority subordinate to it. this power of delegation is referable only to the power exercisable under the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and no reference is made to the powers exercisable and duties imposed on it under the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 2001 (HC)

K. Satyanarayana Vs. Govt. of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(4)ALD36; 2001(3)ALT654

..... the sake of brevity) made certain amendments to the a.p. minor mineral concession rules, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules' for the sake of brevity) issued in g.o. ms ..... by virtue of mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 (parliamentary act) being contrary to the objectives and provisions of the said act.2. by reason of the g.o. ms. no.1, industries and commerce (mi) department dated 1-1-2001, the governor of andhra pradesh in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 15 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to ..... as 'the said act' for .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 2003 (HC)

B. Agarwal Stone Product Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC2957

..... not appear to be correct. 11. it may be mentioned that mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, was made for development and regulation of mines and minerals. a perusal of the act shows that the main purpose of the act was to regulate mines and minerals and it was not basically concerned with transportation of the minerals from the mines to the main roads. obviously the road or link road by which ..... the ambit of section 239 read with sections 142 and 143 of the u. p. kshetra panchayat and zila panchayat adhiniyam and it only incidentally entrenches on the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and the rules made thereunder. 15. for the reasons given above, we are of the opinion that the view taken by the division bench of this court ..... the impugned levy is really a fee under section 239 of the u. p. kshetra panchayat and zila panchayat adhiniyam and the field is not covered by the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. the whole issue really turns on a simple question, namely, whether the state or the local body can charge a fee or toll for constructing and maintaining roads ..... the rate of rs. 30 per truck. 9. one of the point urged by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the field is covered by the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and the rules made thereunder. in this connection learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on a division bench decision of this court in okhla sand supply company .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2009 (HC)

B. Muthuraman @ Balasubramanian Muthuraman and ors. Vs. State of Jhark ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2165

..... far this case is concerned, complaint has never been made to the magistrate by the informant, though under section 22 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, any prosecution under that act or rules or regulation made under the act such as, jharkhand mineral transit challan regulations, 2005 needs to be set at motion by filing complaint by an authorized person before a magistrate. further any investigation, enquiry ..... the case has been lodged do fall within the purview of 'special legislation', namely, jharkhand mineral transit challan regulations, 2005 and mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and in that event the cognizance of such offence in terms of the provision as contained in section 22 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 can be taken by the court only upon complaint in writing made by a person authorized ..... ) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 in order to prevent illegal mining, transportation, storage of minerals and mineral products whereas clause 9 of the said regulation does prescribe that whenever any mining lessee transports the minerals raised in his mine without any valid permit or challen, it will be treated as a transgression of the conditions of the lease and provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and also mineral concession rules, 1960 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 2009 (SC)

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(6)SC434; 2009(7)SCALE650; (2009)6SCC142; 2009(6)LC2626(SC)

..... forest cover, we have the forest (conservation) act, 1980, which was enacted to regulate the diversion of forest area for non-forest purposes. similarly, under the ep ..... forest areas coming under the purview of section 2(ii) of forest (conservation) act, 1980. it applies to mining leases. it is important to note that in order to operate mining inside the forest area, the lessee is required to possess clearances under mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 ('1957 act'); under section 2(ii) of forest (conservation) act, 1980; and to environment clearance under eia notification which applies to ..... . the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974; air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 and environment (protection) act, 1986 were enacted to implement the decisions taken in united nations conference on human environment in 1972 at stockholm. these environment and forests statutes interact with mining regulations under mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957; mineral concession rules, 1960; mineral conservation and development rules, 1988. on account of depletion of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2012 (SC)

Deepak Kumar Etc. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... .10. government of india was receiving various reports regarding the adverse impacts on riverbeds and groundwater due to quarrying/mining of minerals. the mines and minerals (development & regulation) act 1957 empowers the state governments to make rules in respect of minor 10minerals. it was noticed that proposals for mining of major minerals typically undergo environment impact assessment and environmental clearance procedure, but due attention has not been given to environmental ..... aspects of mining of minor minerals.environmental impact assessment notification of 1994 did not apply to the mining of minor minerals, noticing that minor minerals ..... from the environmental, ecological and bio-diversity point of view and therefore the state governments have to frame proper rules in accordance with the recommendations, under section 15 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957.15. quarrying of river sand, it is true, is an important economic activity in the country with river sand forming a crucial raw material for the infrastructural .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 2009 (SC)

Som Datt Builders Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC1039(SC); JT2009(14)SC344; 2009(13)SCALE642; (2010)1SCC311; 2009(10)LC4936(SC):2009AIRSCW7452

..... (e), central government issued the following notification on february 3, 2000:g.s.r. 95(e).--in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (e) of section 3 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957), the central government hereby declares the `ordinary earth' used for filling or levelling purposes in construction of embankments, roads, railways, buildings to be a minor ..... filling or levelling purposes in the construction of embankments, roads, railways, buildings has validly been declared to be a `minor mineral' by the central government vide notification dated february 3, 2000 issued under section 3(e) of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (for short, `act, 1957').4. it is not necessary to refer to the facts of each of these appeals. the brief narration of facts ..... in civil appeal no. 2088 of 2007 will suffice. the appellant therein is a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956. it is engaged in the construction of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2006 (HC)

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited a Company Incorporate ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(2)KLJ235; 2007(1)KCCRSN16; 2007(1)AIRKarR402

..... are challenging the notifications dated 17.2.2003 and 15.3.2003 issued by the government of karnataka, complaining that their preferential rights under rule 11(2) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 are affected by those notifications. therefore, all these petitions are clubbed together, heard and disposed of by this common order.2. in wp.no. 18445/2003 the petitioner is ..... rules 1960 (for short hereinafter referred to as the 'rules') and also sought for prior approval under section 5(1) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (for short hereinafter referred to as the 'act') from the central government. the central government on 11.4.1997 granted the approval and also relaxed under rule 59(2) of the rules. thereafter the state government sanctioned ..... national mineral development corporation limited a government of india enterprises. on 11/12.12.1968 they made an application for mining lease over an area of 4025 hectares of land situated in ramadurga .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //