Skip to content


Options Dock ▼

Judgment Search Results Home > Search Phrase: prevention of damage to public property act 1984 section 3 Page 1 of about 5,906 results ( seconds)

Jul 07 2006 (HC)

Mohan Pandey and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... quashing the f.i.r. of baikunthpur p.s. case no. 35 of 2003 dated 17.4.2003 registered under sections 420, 414 and 120b of the indian penal code as well as section 3 of the prevention of of damage to public property act,1984.3. petitioner no. 1 is the manager of m/s mamta filling station, baikunthpur and other petitioners are staff of m/ ..... the e.c. act has over riding effect on all other enactment which are inconsistent with as contrary ..... to the provisions of the e.g. act or any order framed thereunder.8. the district magistrate ..... the provisions of essential commodities act for contravention of its its orders. the officer-in-charge has acted without following any procedure under the law and in haste got registered a case under sections 420, 414 and 120b of the indian penal code and section 3 of the prevention of damage to public property act 1984. by virtue of section 6 of the essential commodities act the orders made under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 2000 (HC)

Kerala Vyapari Vavasayi Ekopana Samithi, Ottappalam and anr. Vs. State ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2000Ker389

..... in any form should be dealt with firmly by initiating appropriate legal action. 17. in case of destruction of public property including transport buses, office buildings etc. prompt action should be taken to book the culprits under relevant sections of pdpp actpdpp actpdpp actpdpp actpdpp act and the investigations pursued to their logical conclusion without undue delay. 18. it should be ensured that ..... officers of the state have the duty to protect and preserve public property. the performance of that duty also involves the recovery of compensation when a public or state asset is wantonly destroyed. so, in addition to initiating action under the penal law including the prevention of damage to public property act, 1984, the state can also sue the wrong doers and their ..... submits that additional directions may be issued especially regarding the averting of forcible compulsory closure of commercial establishments and the plying of public and private vehicles on roads. counsel for respondent no. 3 submitted that any organisation has the fundamental right to call and hold a hartal and this court cannot curtail that freedom by ..... -1999. copy of bandobust scheme should be sent to the director general of police, kerala and addl. director general of police, intelligence also well in advance. 3. the police will assist the district collectors throughout the state in the implementation of their orders for requisitioning of additional vehicles, wherever necessary. 4. maximum possible efforts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 2010 (HC)

Gireesan Nair S/O. Gopalan Pillai Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... bhavadasan, j.1. thirty three persons were prosecuted for the offences punishable under sections 120b, 143, 147, 148, 324, 427, 506, 302 r/w 149 ipcipcipc and sections 109, 111 ipcipcipc and section 3(2)(e) of the prevention of damages to public property act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the pdpp actpdpp actpdpp actpdpp actpdpp act). accused nos. 8, 13, 15 and 20 to 24 were found ..... not guilty of any of the offences and were acquitted of the charges. accused nos. 17 and 19 were found guilty of the offences punishable under section 302 r/w ..... a33 are acquitted of the charges under section 120b r/w section 3(2)(e) of the pdpp actpdpp actpdpp actpdpp actpdpp act.(c) the conviction and sentence of a1 to a7, a9 to a12, a14, a16 to a19 for the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148 ipcipcipc, section 3(2)(e) of the pdpp actpdpp actpdpp actpdpp actpdpp act r/w section 149 ipcipcipc are upheld and confirmed.( ..... inadequate. it has to be stated that there is some substance in the above complaint with reference to the offence punishable under section 3(2)(e) of the pdpp actpdpp actpdpp actpdpp actpdpp act. the menace of causing destruction to the public property has been on the increase in recent times and the miscreants are able to go scot-free for various reasons. in fact, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2001 (HC)

Anand Kumar Goenka Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT252; 2001(3)MPLJ272

..... . 12/97.2. it appears that the forest range officer, maihar investigated the offences punishable under sections 33 and 63 of the indian forest act, 1927 (for short 'the forest act') and the offences punishable under sections 3 and 4 of the prevention of damage to public property act, 1984, (for short 'the act of 1984').3. the charge-sheet against the petitioner and the other accused persons was filed in the court of ..... additional chief judicial magistrate, maihar. the petitioner and the other accused persons were charged for violation of sections 33 and 63 ..... of the forest act and also for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 2010 (SC)

Babubhai , State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Ganeshbhai Jakshibhai Bharwad ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , 436 and 427 of the indian penal code, 1860 (hereinafter called as "ipcipcipc") read with section 135 of the bombay police act, 1951 (for short "bp act") and sections 3, 7 of prevention of damages of public property act, 1984 (for short "1984 act") for an incident which occurred at village dhedhal, wherein mr. m.n. pandya, sub-inspector of ..... a.p. v. sarma rao & ors. air 2007 sc 137). thus, it is evident that in exceptional circumstances, the court in order to prevent the miscarriage of criminal justice, if considers necessary, it may direct for investigation de novo wherein the case presents exceptional circumstances.34. in the instant ..... the koli patel communities over the plying of rickshaws in the area surrounding dhedhal village of distt. ahmedabad, gujarat. the bharwad community had been preventing the koli patels from running their rickshaws in the said area. on the next day, i.e. on 8.7.2008, case no. ..... of the police to investigate a cognizable offence has to be struck by the court. there cannot be any controversy that sub-section (8) of section 173 crpccrpccrpc empowers the police to make further investigation, obtain further evidence (both oral and documentary) and forward a further ..... to the conclusion that there was a serious irregularity in the investigation that had taken place, the court may direct a further investigation under section 173(8) cr.p.c., even transferring the investigation to an independent agency, rather than directing a re-investigation. "direction of a re .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 2011 (HC)

Praful Bhailo Dhanjibhai Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

..... . application no.11985 of 2010 was withdrawn.2. the applicant accused is charged with having committed offence under sections 397, 395, 332, 427, 323, 504 & 506(2) of ipcipcipc and under section 3(1)(c) of prevention of damages to public property act, 1984 and sec. 135 of bombay police act for which firfirfir being c.r.no. i-41/2010 has been registered with bhanwad police ..... station.3. learned counsel mr. kamal sojitra submitted that considering the nature of offence and the manner in which it ..... incident has occurred. he, therefore, submitted that present application may be allowed.4. learned app mr. kartik pandya resisted the application and submitted that when the police personnel tried to prevent the gambling, the accused attacked.5. having heard the learned advocate mr. sojitra for the applicant and learned app mr. kartik pandya and having considered the nature of offence and ..... :(a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty.(b) not to try to tamper or pressurize the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner.(c) not act in any manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution.(d) maintain law and order and should cooperate with the investigating officers.(e) mark his presence before concerned police station .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2011 (HC)

Hanif @ Khatko Suleman Varalia and 1 Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat - Ahmedabad

..... connection with offence registered with vagdod police station, vide c.r.no.i- 86 of 2010 for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 326, 333, 332, 427 of ipcipcipc and sections 3 and 7 of the damages to public properties act.3. heard learned advocate mr gondalia for the applicant-accused and mr kodekar, learned app for the state. perused the firfirfir ..... people got engaged in rioting and stone pelting. it is also alleged that there was some damage caused to the public property. it also appears that police officials were also injured and one of them has received a grievous injury. therefore, there is a charge of section 326 ipcipcipc. however, considering the role ascribed to the applicant-accused and the nature of ..... they shall,1. not take undue advantage of their liberty or abuse their liberty;2. not to try to tamper or pressurize the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner;3. not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;4. maintain law and order and should cooperate the investigating officers;5. mark their presence before the concerned police .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2007 (HC)

Sanjay Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... counsel for the petitioner and also perused the relevant section of the prevention of damage of public property act, 1984. section 3(1) of the act runs as follows:3. mischief causing damage to public property. - (1) whoever commits mischief by doing any act in respect of any public property, other than public property of the nature referred to in sub-section (2), shall be punished with imprisonment for a ..... term which may extend to five years and with fine. 6. mischief has been defined in section 2 of the act ..... counsel that prosecution of the petitioner under the above provision of prevention of damage of public property act, 1984 is misuse of process of the court. no case is made out under section 3 of the said act of 1984, no mischief was committed nor any damage was done to any public property, it is further submitted that this petitioner was not responsible ..... .6.2005 passed by c.j.m., patna in kotwali p.s. case no. 436 of 2002 thereby cognizance under section 3 of prevention of damage of public property act, 1984 has been taken against this petitioner and others.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2005 (HC)

Anirudha S. Bhagat Vs. Ramnivas Meena and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(4)MhLj41

..... the lives of about 25-30 people. the f.l.r. came to be lodged by the circle police inspector, daman on 28-8-2003 under sections 3 and 4 of prevention of damage to public property act, 1984 as well as sections 304a, 337 and 338 of indian penal code. the petitioner is a chairman and managing director of a company known as m/s. quadricon pvt. ltd ..... on 28th september, 1973. the petitioners could not attend the police station in compliance with the order. consequently a challan was entered by the assistant public prosecutor against the petitioners in respect of an offence under section 174 of the indian penal code. summonses were issued to the petitioners which were sought to be challenged before the learned single judge of himachal ..... design done by her if it is possible. shri joshi shall also try to get the original design from the goa government. the chief secretary and the principal engineer, pwdpwdpwd, shall act on the copy of this order and co-operate.' in a proceeding sheet dated 1 lth march, 2005 it has been recorded that 'shri kulkarni, the learned counsel ..... , for the administration/ pwdpwdpwd, has handed over a copy of the letter dated 4-3-2005 addressed by shri dharmendra, secretary (finance and pwdpwdpwd) of the union territories, to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2011 (HC)

Abdul Nazir Maudany Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... 120 (b), 121, 121(a), 302, 307, 326, 435 and 201 of the ipcipcipc and sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of explosive substances act, 1908, section 4 of prevention of damage of public property 1984 and sections 3, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 of unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967.) 1. the petitioner who is accused no.31 in cr.no.483/08 (c.c.no.23444 ..... (prevention) act, 1967, and he is before this court seeking bail under section 439 of cr.p.c. 2. before going to the prosecution ..... , 121, 121-a,302,307,326,435 and 201 of ipcipcipc, sections 3,4,5 and 6 of the explosive substances act, 1908, section 4 of the prevention of damage to public property, 1984 and sections 3, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 of the unlawful activities ..... /08) is one of the 32 accused persons against whom a case is registered for the offences punishable under sections 120-b .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //