Skip to content


Jul 16 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Harish NaIn Advocate Vs. Presiding Officer Industrial Tri ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , he was not entitled for reinstatement and was entitled only for grant of back kumar amit wages. reliance was placed on the judgment of hon'ble supreme 2013.08.22 10:31 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document civil writ petition no.961 o 3. court in secretary, state of ..... entertaining the specious and untenable grounds put forward by the employer public or private. in the judgment of gitam singh's case (supra).the hon'ble supreme court again came to the conclusion observing that therefore, the normal rule that dismissed employee is entitled to reinstatement in cases of wrongful dismissal has been ..... provision which has a beneficial purpose and a public policy behind it would result in nullifying the retrenchment. in devinder singh's case (supra).the hon'ble supreme court in para 13, 19 and 28 of the judgment, observed as under:- 13. the source of employment, the method of recruitment, the terms and ..... difference of one circumstance or additional fact can make the world of difference, as held by the hon'ble supreme court in padmausundra rao and another versus state of tamil nadu and kumar amit 2013.08.22 10:31 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document civil writ petition no.961 o ..... 13. others.2002 (3) scc 533. respectfully following the law laid down by the hon'ble supreme court in the above noted cases and applying .....

Tag this Judgment!
Sep 11 2013 (HC)

Dr. Saraswati W/O. Sudam Munde and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai - Aurangabad

..... which bail can be cancelled are mentioned. there cannot be any dispute over the propositions made in the aforesaid cases. 24. in the case reported as air 2013 supreme court 296 [kanwar singh meena vs. state of rajasthan and anr.], the apex court has discussed the provisions of section 439 (2) of cr.p.c ..... . with reference to the landmark case of supreme court like ruranvs. rambilas and anr. reportedas air 2001 sc 2023. the observations are as follows : "while cancelling bail under section 439 (2) of the ..... to retain his freedom by enjoying the concession of bail during the trial. in other cases reported as 2009 (2) bom. c.r. (cri.) 491 (supreme court) [manjit prakash and ors. vs. shobha devi and anr.], the apex court has discussed the difference between setting aside unjustified, illegal or perverse order of ..... applicants are the main offenders, this court holds that no bail can be granted to them. so the order. order (i) criminal application nos. 3350/2013 and 1055/2013 stand rejected. rule stands discharged in these proceedings. (ii) criminal application no. 4774/2012 is allowed. the order made by additional sessions judge, ambajogai in ..... c.c. no. 163/2012 dr. smt. mundhe has been behind bars since 3.4.2013. in c.r. no. 42/2012, dr. shri. mundhe has been behind bars since 13.6.2012. bail is refused to him up to supreme court in other case like r.c.c. no. 302/2010. 10. for both .....

Tag this Judgment!
Oct 23 2013 (HC)

Abasaheb S/O Balasaheb Varkhade and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai - Aurangabad

..... statement of the witness or to contradict him. reliance has also been placed on the case of r. shaji vs. state of kerala, reported in a.i.r. 2013 supreme court, page 651. relevant portion of para 14 and para 15 and 16 are as under: "14. evidence given in a court under oath has great sanctity, ..... accused exhibited the knowledge or the mental awareness of the informant as to its existence at a particular place." it has been further observed by the hon'ble supreme court in the same para that: "....there is one more point which we would like to discuss i.e. whether pointing out a material object by the ..... council in pulukuri kotayya vs. emperor, a.i.r. 1947 p.c. 67. with reference to "discovery of fact" as referred in section 27, hon'ble supreme court observed in para 13 as under: "we are of the view that kotayya's case is an authority for the proposition that 'discovery of fact' cannot be ..... done to impose conviction. as regards discovery, the learned counsel for accused relied on the case of makhansingh vs. state of punjab, reported in a.i.r. 1988 supreme court, page 1705. para 14 of the said judgment is as under: "14. then we are left with the recovery of the dead bodies. investigating officer s. ..... be acquitted. the learned counsel for the accused relied on the case of ram kishan singh vs. harmit kaur and another, reported in a.i.r. 1972 supreme court, page 468, where it has been observed that statement under section 164 of cr. p.c. is not substantive evidence and it can be used only to .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jan 29 2014 (HC)

The Chalisgaon Municipal Council and Another Vs. the State of Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai - Aurangabad

..... or lack of resources can never be said to be the reason for not taking steps to implement the proposals, allocations and designations in the development plan. as the honble supreme court has observed that one of the reason which is often given for modification/deletion of reservation is paucity of funds?. if there is any such difficulty, then, the planning ..... any public purpose. in this context, a reference can usefully be made to a recent decision of the honble supreme court in the case of jayeshdhanesh goragandhi vs. municipal corporation of greater mumbai and others, reported in air 2013 supreme court 882. the honble supreme court held as under:- 18. we have already stated that the only question that arises for consideration is whether ..... recent decision in the case of girishvyas and another vs. state of maharashtra and others, air 2012 sc 2043, the honble supreme court had an occasion to consider the scheme of the m.r.t.p. act, 1966. the honble supreme court has held as under:- 73. the provision of a statute are required to be read together after noting the purpose ..... other utilities, services and conveniences. the importance of planning and for the future is emphasized in the judgment of the honble supreme court in the case of padmavs. hiralal motilal desarda and others, reported in air 2002 sc 3252. the honble supreme court held as under:- 29. laws dealing with development planning are indispensable to sanitation and healthy urbanization. development planning comprehensively .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jan 10 2014 (HC)

Sinhgad Technical Education Society and Another Vs. Maharashtra Univer ...

Court : Mumbai

..... and state government has itself allotted students and/or permitted petitioner no.2 college to admit student directly, in pursuance of directions issued by the supreme court. the muhs vide letter dated 11 november 2013 returned the proposal for extension of affiliation and continuation of affiliation for the year 2014-2015, of the petitioners on the ground that the muhs has ..... permission of state government. being aggrieved by the order passed in writ petition no. 6414 of 2013, the petitioners preferred special leave appeal in the supreme court and by order 7 august 2013, supreme court allowed the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition no. 6414 of 2013, filed before this court with liberty to file fresh petition with proper prayers. the petitioners filed ..... graduate courses was duly conducted by petitioner no.2 college in pursuance of the directions issued by the supreme court on the basis of statement made by the state government. 9. the petitioners vide letters dated 31 july 2013 and 16 september 2013 requested the respondent state to issue necessary government resolution as insisted by the muhs so as to enable ..... grant of permission to less number of intake of post graduate seats in petitioner no.2 college, petitioners filed 3 writ petitions before the supreme court of india. after hearing the respective parties, the supreme court disposed of the matters on 30 july 2013. pursuant to the directions issued by the apex court, imc issued three letters of permission on 1 august .....

Tag this Judgment!
Aug 13 2014 (HC)

Manohar Lal Sharma Advocate Vs. the Principal Secretary, Prime Ministe ...

Court : Delhi

..... judicial review may be called for on two grounds, namely, (i) lack of eligibility and (ii) lack of effective consultation . wp(c) 4653/2013 & 4619/2013 supreme court held that eligibility is a matter of fact, whereas suitability is a matter of opinion. it was further observed that in cases involving lack of eligibility ..... a warrant issued by the president under his hand and seal.45. we may also take note of the supreme court decision in the case of m. manohar reddy v. union of india: (2013) 3 scc99 in that case, a petition under article 32 of the constitution of india had been filed purportedly ..... scrutiny by parliament or the legislatures of the states, as the case may be. a reference was made to the supreme court decision in the case of arun kumar aggarwal v. union of india: (2013) 7 scale333 where the court held that a cag report, by itself, cannot be accepted by the court as ..... is different from that of governors of states and akin to that of the judges of the supreme court, the manner of appointment of the cag is similar to that of governors. wp(c) 4653/2013 & 4619/2013 qualification or criteria for an incumbent of the high office of cag. it was submitted that ..... brevity, which indicated congruence of the averments made in wp(c) 618/2007 and the present wp(c) 4653/2013. the learned attorney general submitted that the earlier petitions, which were dismissed by the supreme court, as well as the present petitions, have a common thread apart from having near identical averments and that .....

Tag this Judgment!
Aug 13 2014 (HC)

N Gopalaswami and ors Vs. the Union of India and anr

Court : Delhi

..... judicial review may be called for on two grounds, namely, (i) lack of eligibility and (ii) lack of effective consultation . wp(c) 4653/2013 & 4619/2013 supreme court held that eligibility is a matter of fact, whereas suitability is a matter of opinion. it was further observed that in cases involving lack of eligibility ..... a warrant issued by the president under his hand and seal.45. we may also take note of the supreme court decision in the case of m. manohar reddy v. union of india: (2013) 3 scc99 in that case, a petition under article 32 of the constitution of india had been filed purportedly ..... scrutiny by parliament or the legislatures of the states, as the case may be. a reference was made to the supreme court decision in the case of arun kumar aggarwal v. union of india: (2013) 7 scale333 where the court held that a cag report, by itself, cannot be accepted by the court as ..... is different from that of governors of states and akin to that of the judges of the supreme court, the manner of appointment of the cag is similar to that of governors. wp(c) 4653/2013 & 4619/2013 qualification or criteria for an incumbent of the high office of cag. it was submitted that ..... brevity, which indicated congruence of the averments made in wp(c) 618/2007 and the present wp(c) 4653/2013. the learned attorney general submitted that the earlier petitions, which were dismissed by the supreme court, as well as the present petitions, have a common thread apart from having near identical averments and that .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jun 26 2013 (FN)

United States V. Windsor

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of elections, nov. 3, 2009, referendum tabulation (question 1). 9 maine bureau of elections, nov. 6, 2012, referendum electiontabulations (question 1). united states v. windsor - 12-307 (2013) supreme court of the united states _________________ no. 12 307 _________________ united states, petitioner v. edith schlain windsor, in her capacity as executor of the estate of thea clara spyer, et ..... properly before us doma s constitutionality but also a question that all agree, and the court explicitly acknowledges, is not at issue. united states v. windsor - 12-307 (2013) supreme court of the united states _________________ no. 12 307 _________________ united states, petitioner v. edith schlain windsor, in her capacity as executor of the estate of thea clara spyer, ..... confined to those lawful marriages. the judgment of the court of appeals for the second circuit is affirmed. it is so ordered. united states v. windsor - 12-307 (2013) supreme court of the united states _________________ no. 12 307 _________________ united states, petitioner v. edith schlain windsor, in her capacity as executor of the estate of thea clara spyer, ..... quotation marks and brackets omitted). that is jaw-dropping. it is an assertion of judicial supremacy over the people s representatives in congress and the executive. it envisions a supreme court standing (or rather enthroned) at the apex of government, empowered to decide all constitutional questions, always and every- where primary in its role. this image of the .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jun 25 2013 (FN)

Adoptive Couple V. Baby Girl

Court : US Supreme Court

..... daughter, and the statute amply protects his right to do so. there is no reason in law or policy to dilute that protection. adoptive couple v. baby girl - 12-399 (2013) supreme court of the united states _________________ no. 12 399 _________________ adoptive couple, petitioners v. baby girl, a minor child under the age of fourteen years, et al. on writ of ..... the tribe, and subject to a court s consideration of good cause? i raise, but do not here try to answer, the question. adoptive couple v. baby girl - 12-399 (2013) supreme court of the united states _________________ no. 12 399 _________________ adoptive couple, petitioners v. baby girl, a minor child under the age of fourteen years, et al. on writ of ..... ). i need not address this argument because i am satisfied that congress lacks authority to regulate the child custody proceedings in this case. adoptive couple v. baby girl - 12-399 (2013) supreme court of the united states _________________ no. 12 399 _________________ adoptive couple, petitioners v. baby girl, a minor child under the age of fourteen years, et al. on writ of ..... such adoption in the south carolina courts. see reply brief for petitioners 13 14; see also brief for respondent cherokee nation 21 22. adoptive couple v. baby girl - 12-399 (2013) supreme court of the united states _________________ no. 12 399 _________________ adoptive couple, petitioners v. baby girl, a minor child under the age of fourteen years, et al. on writ of .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 17 2013 (FN)

Missouri V. Mcneely

Court : US Supreme Court

..... court noted in schmerber, would raise additional and serious concerns. see ante, at 14 15. missouri v. mcneely - 11-1425 (2013) supreme court of the united states _________________ no. 11 1425 _________________ missouri, petitioner v. tyler g. mcneely on writ of certiorari to the ..... is arrested for being under the influence of alcohol is inconsistent with the fourth amendment. missouri v. mcneely - 11-1425 (2013) supreme court of the united states _________________ no. 11 1425 _________________ missouri, petitioner v. tyler g. mcneely on writ of certiorari to the ..... for blood testing in cape girardeau county that had shorter processing times. id., at 70. missouri v. mcneely - 11-1425 (2013) supreme court of the united states _________________ no. 11 1425 _________________ missouri, petitioner v. tyler g. mcneely on writ of certiorari to the ..... see united states v. detroit timber & lumber co., 200 u. s. 321 . supreme court of the united states syllabus missouri v. mcneely certiorari to the supreme court of missouri no. 11 1425. argued january 9, 2013 decided april 17, 2013 respondent mcneely was stopped by a missouri police officer for speeding and crossing the centerline. ..... supreme court of missouri [april 17, 2013] justice thomas, dissenting. this case requires the court to decide whether the fourth amendment prohibits an officer from obtaining a blood .....

Tag this Judgment!
Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //