Skip to content

Search Results AdvancedSearch > Judgments > Court:Supreme Year:2013

Dec 16 2013

Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

  • Decided on : 16-Dec-2013

Court : US Supreme Court

... -729 (2013) NOTICE:?This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports.?Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press ... of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus HEIMESHOFF v. HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. etal. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit No. 12729.?Argued October ... States, 545 U.S. 353, 358 (2005) (the statute of limitations in the federal habeas statute runs from the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court even if the right has not yet been made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review); McMahon v. United States, 342 U.S. 2527 (1951) (the limitations period in ... of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 12729 _________________ JULIE HEIMESHOFF, PETITIONER v. HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. et al. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of ...

Dec 11 2013

Kansas v. Cheever

  • Decided on : 11-Dec-2013

Court : US Supreme Court

... ability to premeditate. Defendants need not as-sert a mental disease or defect in order to assert a defense based on mental status. To the extent that the Kansas Supreme Court declined to apply Buchanan because Cheevers intoxication was temporary, our precedents are again not so narrowly circumscribed. Like voluntary intoxication, extreme emotional disturbance is a temporary condition, ... jury selection, however, defense counsel became unable to continue; the court suspended the proceedings and later dismissed the case without prejudice. Meanwhile, this Court had reversed the Kansas Supreme Court and held that the Kansas death penalty statute was constitutional. Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163, 167 (2006). A second federal prosecution never commenced. Kansas then ... those based on psychological expert evidence as to a defendants mens rea, mental capacity to commit the crime, or ability to premeditate. To the extent that the Kansas Supreme Court declined to apply Buchanan because Cheevers intoxication was temporary, this Courts precedents are again not so narrowly circumscribed, as evidenced by the fact that the courts where ... commit a crime, the prosecution may offer evidence from a court-ordered psychological examination for the limited purpose of rebutting the defendants evidence. The judgment of the Kansas Supreme Court is therefore vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Notes 1 Evans described this damage as ...

Dec 10 2013

Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs

  • Decided on : 10-Dec-2013

Court : US Supreme Court

... IUBs proceeding, however, the state ethics committees hearing in Middlesex was plainly akin to a criminal proceeding: An investigation and formal complaint preceded the hearing, an agency of the States Supreme Court initiated the hearing, and the hearings purpose was to determine whether the lawyer should be disciplined for failing to meet the States professional conduct standards. 457 U.S., ... the state ethics committees hearing in Middlesex was indeed akin to a criminal proceeding. As we noted, an investigation and formal complaint preceded the hearing, an agency of the States Supreme Court initiated the hearing, and the purpose of the hearing was to determine whether the lawyer should be disciplined for his failure to meet the States standards of professional ... 815 (2013) NOTICE:?This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports.?Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to ... of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. JACOBS etal. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit No. 12815.?Argued November 5, ...

Dec 10 2013

Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall

  • Decided on : 10-Dec-2013

Court : US Supreme Court

... the eleventh circuit [December 10, 2013] Per Curiam. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered. Unite Here Local 355 v. Mulhall - 12-99 (2013) SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 1299 _________________ UNITE HERE LOCAL 355, PETITIONER v. MARTIN MULHALL etal. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for ... -99 (2013) NOTICE:?This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports.?Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press ... of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 1299 _________________ UNITE HERE LOCAL 355, PETITIONER v. MARTIN MULHALL etal. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for ...

Dec 03 2013

United States v. Woods

  • Decided on : 03-Dec-2013

Court : US Supreme Court

... -562 (2013) NOTICE:?This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports.?Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press ... of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus UNITED STATES v. WOODS certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit No. 12562.?Argued October 9, 2013Decided December 3 ... of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 12562 _________________ UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. GARY WOODS on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit [ ...

Dec 03 2013

Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western D ...

  • Decided on : 03-Dec-2013

Court : US Supreme Court

... -929 (2013) NOTICE:?This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports.?Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press ... of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus ATLANTIC MARINE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS etal. certiorari to the united states court of ... of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 12929 _________________ ATLANTIC MARINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS et al. on writ ...

Dec 02 2013

Ford Motor Co. v. United States

  • Decided on : 02-Dec-2013

Court : US Supreme Court

... Ford Motor Co. v. United States SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. UNITED STATES on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit No. 13113.? ...

Nov 05 2013

Burt v. Titlow

  • Decided on : 05-Nov-2013

Court : US Supreme Court

... ) respondent failed to present enough evidence to overcome the twin presumptions of AEDPA and Strickland, I join fully in the opinion of the Court. Burt v. Titlow - 12-414 (2013) SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 12414 _________________ SHERRY L. BURT, WARDEN, PETITIONER v. VONLEE NICOLE TITLOW on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for ... -414 (2013) NOTICE:?This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports.?Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press ... adequately demonstrated prejudice, and whether the Sixth Circuits remedy is at odds with our decision in Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U. S. ___ (2012). Burt v. Titlow - 12-414 (2013) SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 12414 _________________ SHERRY L. BURT, WARDEN, PETITIONER v. VONLEE NICOLE TITLOW on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for ... of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus BURT, WARDEN v. TITLOW certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit No. 12414.?Argued October 8, 2013Decided November 5 ...

Nov 04 2013

Stanton v. Sims

  • Decided on : 04-Nov-2013

Court : US Supreme Court

... Stanton v. Sims SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES MIKE STANTON, PETITIONER v. DRENDOLYN SIMS on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 121217.? ...

Oct 15 2013

Madigan v. Levin

  • Decided on : 15-Oct-2013

Court : US Supreme Court

Madigan v. Levin - 12-872 (2013) NOTICE:?This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports.?Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 12872 _________________ LISA MADIGAN, et al., PETITIONERS v. HARVEY N. LEVIN on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit [October 15, 2013] Per Curiam. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //