Home   |   Subscription   |   Feedback   |   Blog  |   Tips   |   Contact Us
Search Options

Baburao Sidhu Jadhav (Patil) vs. State of Maharashtra,

Subject : Constitution
Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 47 and 243A; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 54, 54(1), 54(3), 56, 139 and 139(1); Bombay Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1997 - Sections 11; Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961
Year : 2003-04-29
Court : Mumbai

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners and Ors. and Indian Institute of Architects vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.

Subject : Service Tax
Acts : Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 - Sections 68 and 116; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 246(1); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 6 and 6(3)
Year : 2001-02-22
Court : Mumbai

Inamdars of Sulhnagar Colony and Ors. vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Anr.

Subject : PropertyConstitution
Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 31, 31(2), 31(3) and 200; Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 38E
Year : 1961-03-16
Court : Andhra Pradesh

Kavita Kumari Kandhw and Ors. vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Subject : Civil
Acts : Jharkhand Reservation Act, 2001; Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950; Bihar Re-organization Act, 2000 - Sections 84; Constitution of India - Articles 16(4), 16(4A), 341 and 342
Year : 2006-05-01
Court : Jharkhand

Heir of Rupabhai Kuberbhai vs. State of Gujarat

Subject : Property
Acts : Constitution of India
Year : 1999-11-18
Court : Gujarat

The All India Council for Technical Education, rep. by its Secretary vs. Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (A Deemed to be University) rep. by its Registrar and University Grants Commission, rep. by its Secretary

Subject : Constitution
Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10 and 11; All India Council for Technical Education Rules - Rule 4; All India Council for Technical Education Regulations
Year : 2005-09-20
Court : Chennai



Trade Well, a Proprietorship firm and Mr. Suniel K. Mehta, Proprietor of Trade Well vs. Indian Bank, a Body corporate consulted Under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970 and The State of Maharashtra

Subject : BankingCriminal
Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act - Sections 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3A), 13(4), 14, 14(3), 17, 17(1), 17(3), 18, 19, 31, 34, 35 and 38; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 47 and 48; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(4), 11(5), 11(6) and 11(7); Registration Act; Bombay Police Act; Customs Act; Representation of People Act - Sections 81; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19(1), 20 and 22; Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) - Sections 357; U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Abhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 17; Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 - Rules 8, 8(3), 9, 9(6), 9(7), 9(8), 9(9) and 9(10); Civil Procedure Code (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 95 and 96; Constitution of Ind
Year : 2007-04-02
Court : Mumbai

The University of Pune through Registrar vs. Shri Mahadeo Sahebrao Jadhav

Subject : Constitution
Acts : Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 17(6), 17(7), 17(12), 20, 20(1) and 79; Civil Procedure Code (CPC) - Sections 9A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 162, 309 and 311
Year : 2006-06-13
Court : Mumbai

<< Previous
     1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9      Next >>

About   |   Disclaimer   |   Govt.   |   Einstasoft

©2010 - Privacy
Terms And Conditions