Skip to content

Filter by :

Search Results Judgments > Phrase:bangalore city civil court act

Jul 11 1990

Arun Enterprises Vs. Karnataka Agro Industries Corporation Ltd.

  • Decided on : 11-Jul-1990

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR2435

... Civil Courts Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Civil Courts Act). Consequently, the Courts existing in Bangalore City were also governed by the Civil Courts Act. However, on 27-11-1980, Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as the City Civil Court Act) came into force. The operation of the Section 18(1) of the City Civil Courts Act excluded the operation of the Civil Courts Act in so far it covered the City of Bangalore. In Sub-section (2) of Section 1 of the Civil Courts Act ... City Civil Court. Our reasons are as follows:-2. Prior to 27-11-1980, the entire State of Karnataka was governed by the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Civil Courts Act). Consequently, the Courts existing in Bangalore City were also governed by the Civil Courts Act. However, on 27-11-1980, Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as the City Civil Court Act) came into force. The operation of the Section 18(1) of the City Civil Courts Act ... Bangalore City Civil Court Act had not been taken note of. Therefore, we directed the appeal to be posted 'for being spoken to' on 10-7-1990. It was also pointed out to the learned Counsel appearing for both sides that as the effect of Section 18(1) of the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979 and the words 'law for the time being in force in the City of Bangalore ...

Oct 18 2001

Valliappa Software Technological Park (Private) Limited Vs. C. Sundara ...

  • Decided on : 18-Oct-2001

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR1476; 2002(1)KarLJ358

... Court below submitted. Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, 1979 provides for establishment of City Civil Courts at Bangalore. The City Civil Court is defined in Section 2(3), whereas Section 3(1) provides for establishment of City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. Section 3(2) provides that such a City Civil Court shall consist of a Principal City Civil Judge and other City Civil Judges as the State Government may in consultation of the High Court ... Act. Therefore, it is clear that a Court of Small Causes or any Civil Court of grade inferior to the Principal City Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain arbitration matters.10. The Bangalore City Civil Courts Act of 1979 (for short, 'BCCC Act') provides for the establishment of the City Civil Court in the City of Bangalore. Section 2(2) of the BCCC Act defines the area of the City of Bangalore and Section 2(3) defines City Civil Court meaning the Court ... City Civil Courts constituted under the Act are deemed to be Principal City Civil Courts of original jurisdiction. The definition of Judge makes it clear that there is no difference between Principal City Civil Judge and City Civil Judge of the City Civil Court.11. However, only one Principal City Civil Judge is constituted and other Judges who preside over the City Civil Court would be Additional Judges. Section 5 of the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act ...

Apr 15 1987

Ladies Corner, Bangalore Vs. State of Karnataka and Anr.

  • Decided on : 15-Apr-1987

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1710; 1987(1)KarLJ402

... the wife of Mr. Ravi had filed the suit - O.S. No. 3214/82 - against the Central Muslim Association in the City Civil court and had obtained an order of temporary injunction on 4-11-1982 from the IX Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore City. The premises concerned in the suit is the one situated in Shariff Building, I Main Market Road, Yeshwanthpur. Shariff Building belongs to ... direction to the police by the City Civil Court to act one way or the other; that it was not the case of the wife of the complainant that the accused should forthwith drop the proceedings in view of the proceeding pending before the City Civil Court or that the accused was entering into the realm of the jurisdiction of the Civil Court; that the accused did not have ... briefly stated, are : that the complainant claimed to be tenant or sub-tenant in occupation of a shop in Bangalore of which the Central Muslim Association was the landlord. The complainant brought a suit in O.S. No. 3214/1982 in the City Civil Court, Bangalore, against the said landlord and sought and obtained an order of temporary injunction Dt. 4-11-1982 against ... City Civil Court, Bangalore, against the said landlord and sought and obtained an order of temporary injunction Dt. 4-11-1982 against the complainant's dispossession from the shop. Despite this order which was duly both to the landlord and the accused the latter in contemptuous disregard of that order, proceeded on 6-11-1982 to lock and seal the shop thereby nullifying the court ...

Mar 25 1991

G.V. Rudrappa Vs. Deputy Commissioner

  • Decided on : 25-Mar-1991

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR2497

... The further case of the petitioner is that although the Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore Sub-Division, Bangalore, deposited a sum of Rs. 58,960-50 paise in Court where the case was referred under Sections 30 and 31 of the Act and the said amount was pending in the Court of the 9th Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, the petitioner did not withdraw the amount. In the meanwhile, according ... Act, the said amount came to be deposited in Civil Court.15. The further undisputed fact is that by virtue of the action taken by the competent authority under Section 16 of the Act, possession of the acquired land came to be handed over to the Junior Engineer, Division No. 30, Bangalore City Corporation under a mahazar dated 12-6-1980. Thus the proceedings under the Act ... Assistant Commissioner filed a memo in the Court of the 9th Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, in LAC No. 1463 of 1980 stating that the State Government ordered withdrawal of the acquisition proceedings and therefore the reference made under Sections 30 and 31 of the Act might be dropped. By an order made on 20-4-1983, the Court directed to close the case besides ... reference under Sections 30 and 31 of the Act to the 9th Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, for adjudication of the title to the property and the said reference came to be registered as LAC No. 1463 of 1980 on the file of the said Court. The Land Acquisition Officer also deposited the compensation amount in the said Court and the said fact was intimated ...

Jan 14 1999

Sathya Shree Vs. M. Kumreshan

  • Decided on : 14-Jan-1999

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(5)KarLJ540

... Civil Court of original jurisdiction. Hierarchy of the Courts for administration of justice had been created by the Constitution of the Courts under the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, as well as by Bangalore City Civil Court Act with respect to the City of Bangalore. Karnataka State legislature enacted Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979. Section 3 of the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979 provides for the establishment of a City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. The City Civil Court under sub-section (3) of Section 2 of the Bangalore City Civil Court Act ... Courts for administration of justice had been created by the Constitution of the Courts under the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, as well as by Bangalore City Civil Court Act with respect to the City of Bangalore. Karnataka State legislature enacted Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979. Section 3 of the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979 provides for the establishment of a City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. The City Civil Court under sub-section (3) of Section 2 of the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979, means the Court ...

Apr 04 2005

The Hatti Gold Mines Limited, represented by its Managing Director Vs. ...

  • Decided on : 04-Apr-2005

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant264; 2005(2)ARBLR528(Kar); ILR2005KAR1777; 2005(3)KarLJ502

... Section 2(e) of the Act, the principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction where the petition should have been filed is the City Civil Court at Bangalore.33. It is the case of the respondent that they filed the application under Section 34 of the Act before the Civil Judge (SD) Chitradurga and thereafter before the Prl. District Judge Court at Chitradurga by mistake and therefore ... 6th Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore on 18/2/2003. Along with the appeal the appellant filed application under Section 14 r/w Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 43 of the Act praying to exclude the time taken by the appellant for prosecuting the proceedings bona fide before the two lower Courts which had no jurisdiction. The City Civil Court, Bangalore after ... the Civil Judge (SD) Chitradurga.32. It is now not disputed by the appellant that under Section 2(e) of the Act, the principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction where the petition should have been filed is the City Civil Court at Bangalore.33. It is the case of the respondent that they filed the application under Section 34 of the Act before the Civil Judge ( ... ought to have been filed at Bangalore, but admittedly the application was filed by the appellant before the Civil Judge (SD) Chitradurga.32. It is now not disputed by the appellant that under Section 2(e) of the Act, the principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction where the petition should have been filed is the City Civil Court at Bangalore.33. It is the case ...

Mar 13 1987

Deepak Agencies Vs. Seethalakshmi Hall Flour Mills

  • Decided on : 13-Mar-1987

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1349

... Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, 1979 (in short 'the Act of 1979'). Section 3 of the Act of 1979 provides that as from the appointed date there shall be a City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. With effect from the date of establishment of the City Civil Court, the District Courts, the Courts of the Civil Judges and the Munsiff's Courts established under the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 (Karnataka Act 21 of 1964) within the City of Bangalore ... City of Bangalore under the provisions of the Bangalore City Civil Courts Ordinance, 1979, with effect from 16-11-1979. The Ordinance was replaced by the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, 1979 (in short 'the Act of 1979'). Section 3 of the Act of 1979 provides that as from the appointed date there shall be a City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. With effect from the date of establishment of the City Civil Court, the District Courts, the Courts of the Civil ... City Civil Court was established for the City of Bangalore under the provisions of the Bangalore City Civil Courts Ordinance, 1979, with effect from 16-11-1979. The Ordinance was replaced by the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, 1979 (in short 'the Act of 1979'). Section 3 of the Act of 1979 provides that as from the appointed date there shall be a City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. With effect from the date of establishment of the City Civil Court ...

Jul 30 1987

Ramachandran Vs. Khaleeq Ahmed

  • Decided on : 30-Jul-1987

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR265

... City Civil Court, which alone was competent to execute the orders of eviction.9. Section 3(d) of the K.R.C. Act reads as :'(d) 'Court' means,-(i) in respect of the area comprised within the limits of the City of Bangalore as defined in the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, the Court of Small Causes;'Therefore, under the K.R.C. Act, so far as the Bangalore City is concerned, it is only the Court ... Act, though filed in the Court of Small Causes, should be transferred to the regular City Civil Court, which alone was competent to execute the orders of eviction.9. Section 3(d) of the K.R.C. Act reads as :'(d) 'Court' means,-(i) in respect of the area comprised within the limits of the City of Bangalore as defined in the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, the Court ... Court of Small Causes, should be transferred to the regular City Civil Court, which alone was competent to execute the orders of eviction.9. Section 3(d) of the K.R.C. Act reads as :'(d) 'Court' means,-(i) in respect of the area comprised within the limits of the City of Bangalore as defined in the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, the Court of Small Causes;'Therefore, under the K.R.C. Act ...

Mar 27 2000

Khaleel Ahmed Dakhani Vs. The Hatti Gold Mines Co. Ltd.

  • Decided on : 27-Mar-2000

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2000(3)SC492; 2000(2)SCALE555; (2000)3SCC755; [2000]2SCR575; 2000(1)LC786(SC)

... City Civil Judge, Bangalore would have no jurisdiction does not commend to. us. It cannot always be said, in view of Section 20 of the Code, that only one court will have jurisdiction to try the suit. It is not that the Principal City Civil Court, Bangalore is not a court within the meaning of Section 2(e)5 of the Act. Whether Principal City Civil Judge, Bangalore ... court will have jurisdiction to try the suit. It is not that the Principal City Civil Court, Bangalore is not a court within the meaning of Section 2(e)5 of the Act. Whether Principal City Civil Judge, Bangalore has jurisdiction in the matter or not is still pending with him which proceedings were filed earlier in time than the execution application by the appellant in the District Court ... the Act for setting aside the Award. Now, the learned Principal District Judge, Raichur held that Principal City Civil Court, Bangalore had no jurisdiction to entertain the application under Section 34 of the Act. On this premise he dismissed the application of the respondent and confirmed the order of attachment.5. In support of his argument that court at Bangalore ... City Civil Court, Bangalore had no jurisdiction to entertain the application under Section 34 of the Act. On this premise he dismissed the application of the respondent and confirmed the order of attachment.5. In support of his argument that court at Bangalore would have no jurisdiction Mr. Rajiv Dutta, learned Counsel for the appellant, referred to a decision of this Court ...

Mar 16 2004

Globe Congeneration Power Limited Vs. Sri Hiranyakeshi Sahakari Sakker ...

  • Decided on : 16-Mar-2004

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant94; 2005(1)ARBLR502(Kar); ILR2004KAR2045; 2004(7)KarLJ124

... by means of Arbitration in Bangalore and also provided that the Courts of Bangalore have jurisdiction to entertain disputes under the agreement.3. The appellant alleging that the respondent had acted arbitrarily and was not amenable to peaceful negotiations, preferred an application under Section 9 of the Act before the Court of City Civil and Session Judge, Bangalore for interim measures to ... a Court.7. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties, the only point that arises for decision is whether the Court of Principal City Civil and Sessions Court at Bangalore has jurisdiction to entertain the petition filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Act.8. Section 9 of the Act reads as follows:'9. Interim measures etc. by Court - A ... Bangalore as agreed to by the parties, but, the parties cannot by their agreement confer jurisdiction on a Court.7. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties, the only point that arises for decision is whether the Court of Principal City Civil and Sessions Court at Bangalore has jurisdiction to entertain the petition filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Act ... Act, 1956 and having its registered office at 201, T.V. Industrial Estate, Worli, Mumbai-400 025, is directed against the order dated 25.08.2003 in Arbitration Application No. 40 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the VI Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, (for short, Bangalore Court) dismissing the application filed by the appellant herein under Section 9 of the Act ...

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //