Skip to content


Search Results Judgments > Act:bangalore city civil court act

Jul 11 1990

Arun Enterprises Vs. Karnataka Agro Industries Corporation Ltd.

  • Decided on : 11-Jul-1990

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR2435

... Civil Courts Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Civil Courts Act). Consequently, the Courts existing in Bangalore City were also governed by the Civil Courts Act. However, on 27-11-1980, Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as the City Civil Court Act) came into force. The operation of the Section 18(1) of the City Civil Courts Act excluded the operation of the Civil Courts Act in so far it covered the City of Bangalore. In Sub-section (2) of Section 1 of the Civil Courts Act ... City Civil Court. Our reasons are as follows:-2. Prior to 27-11-1980, the entire State of Karnataka was governed by the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Civil Courts Act). Consequently, the Courts existing in Bangalore City were also governed by the Civil Courts Act. However, on 27-11-1980, Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as the City Civil Court Act) came into force. The operation of the Section 18(1) of the City Civil Courts Act ... Bangalore City Civil Court Act had not been taken note of. Therefore, we directed the appeal to be posted 'for being spoken to' on 10-7-1990. It was also pointed out to the learned Counsel appearing for both sides that as the effect of Section 18(1) of the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979 and the words 'law for the time being in force in the City of Bangalore ...

Oct 18 2001

Valliappa Software Technological Park (Private) Limited Vs. C. Sundara ...

  • Decided on : 18-Oct-2001

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR1476; 2002(1)KarLJ358

... Court below submitted. Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, 1979 provides for establishment of City Civil Courts at Bangalore. The City Civil Court is defined in Section 2(3), whereas Section 3(1) provides for establishment of City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. Section 3(2) provides that such a City Civil Court shall consist of a Principal City Civil Judge and other City Civil Judges as the State Government may in consultation of the High Court ... Act. Therefore, it is clear that a Court of Small Causes or any Civil Court of grade inferior to the Principal City Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain arbitration matters.10. The Bangalore City Civil Courts Act of 1979 (for short, 'BCCC Act') provides for the establishment of the City Civil Court in the City of Bangalore. Section 2(2) of the BCCC Act defines the area of the City of Bangalore and Section 2(3) defines City Civil Court meaning the Court ... City Civil Courts constituted under the Act are deemed to be Principal City Civil Courts of original jurisdiction. The definition of Judge makes it clear that there is no difference between Principal City Civil Judge and City Civil Judge of the City Civil Court.11. However, only one Principal City Civil Judge is constituted and other Judges who preside over the City Civil Court would be Additional Judges. Section 5 of the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act ...

Jan 14 1999

Sathya Shree Vs. M. Kumreshan

  • Decided on : 14-Jan-1999

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(5)KarLJ540

... Civil Court of original jurisdiction. Hierarchy of the Courts for administration of justice had been created by the Constitution of the Courts under the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, as well as by Bangalore City Civil Court Act with respect to the City of Bangalore. Karnataka State legislature enacted Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979. Section 3 of the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979 provides for the establishment of a City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. The City Civil Court under sub-section (3) of Section 2 of the Bangalore City Civil Court Act ... Courts for administration of justice had been created by the Constitution of the Courts under the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, as well as by Bangalore City Civil Court Act with respect to the City of Bangalore. Karnataka State legislature enacted Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979. Section 3 of the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979 provides for the establishment of a City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. The City Civil Court under sub-section (3) of Section 2 of the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979, means the Court ...

Mar 13 1987

Deepak Agencies Vs. Seethalakshmi Hall Flour Mills

  • Decided on : 13-Mar-1987

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1349

... Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, 1979 (in short 'the Act of 1979'). Section 3 of the Act of 1979 provides that as from the appointed date there shall be a City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. With effect from the date of establishment of the City Civil Court, the District Courts, the Courts of the Civil Judges and the Munsiff's Courts established under the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 (Karnataka Act 21 of 1964) within the City of Bangalore ... City of Bangalore under the provisions of the Bangalore City Civil Courts Ordinance, 1979, with effect from 16-11-1979. The Ordinance was replaced by the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, 1979 (in short 'the Act of 1979'). Section 3 of the Act of 1979 provides that as from the appointed date there shall be a City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. With effect from the date of establishment of the City Civil Court, the District Courts, the Courts of the Civil ... City Civil Court was established for the City of Bangalore under the provisions of the Bangalore City Civil Courts Ordinance, 1979, with effect from 16-11-1979. The Ordinance was replaced by the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, 1979 (in short 'the Act of 1979'). Section 3 of the Act of 1979 provides that as from the appointed date there shall be a City Civil Court for the City of Bangalore. With effect from the date of establishment of the City Civil Court ...

Jul 27 1981

Kuppuswamy Gownder Vs. The State of Karnataka

  • Decided on : 27-Jul-1981

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1982CriLJ90; 1981(2)KarLJ509

... Bangalore City Civil Courts Act and conferring of Sessions powers under Section 9(3) of the Cr.P.C. by the High Court on all the City Civil Judges appointed under the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, the case has been shown as pending before the IV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore City, and posted for evidence. On 30-1-1981, the Registrar of the Bangalore City Civil Courts, Bangalore ... Court on all the City Civil Judges appointed under the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, the case has been shown as pending before the IV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore City, and posted for evidence. On 30-1-1981, the Registrar of the Bangalore City Civil Courts, Bangalore, has issued a notification. This notification shows that all the Sessions cases and other matters pending before the II, III and IV Additional City Civil ... Bangalore City, and was posted for evidence. In the statement as by the end of November 1980 i.e., after the coming into force of the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act and conferring of Sessions powers under Section 9(3) of the Cr.P.C. by the High Court on all the City Civil Judges appointed under the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, the case has been shown as pending before the IV Additional City Civil ...

Mar 27 2000

Khaleel Ahmed Dakhani Vs. The Hatti Gold Mines Co. Ltd.

  • Decided on : 27-Mar-2000

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2000(3)SC492; 2000(2)SCALE555; (2000)3SCC755; [2000]2SCR575; 2000(1)LC786(SC)

... City Civil Judge, Bangalore would have no jurisdiction does not commend to. us. It cannot always be said, in view of Section 20 of the Code, that only one court will have jurisdiction to try the suit. It is not that the Principal City Civil Court, Bangalore is not a court within the meaning of Section 2(e)5 of the Act. Whether Principal City Civil Judge, Bangalore ... court will have jurisdiction to try the suit. It is not that the Principal City Civil Court, Bangalore is not a court within the meaning of Section 2(e)5 of the Act. Whether Principal City Civil Judge, Bangalore has jurisdiction in the matter or not is still pending with him which proceedings were filed earlier in time than the execution application by the appellant in the District Court ... the Act for setting aside the Award. Now, the learned Principal District Judge, Raichur held that Principal City Civil Court, Bangalore had no jurisdiction to entertain the application under Section 34 of the Act. On this premise he dismissed the application of the respondent and confirmed the order of attachment.5. In support of his argument that court at Bangalore ... City Civil Court, Bangalore had no jurisdiction to entertain the application under Section 34 of the Act. On this premise he dismissed the application of the respondent and confirmed the order of attachment.5. In support of his argument that court at Bangalore would have no jurisdiction Mr. Rajiv Dutta, learned Counsel for the appellant, referred to a decision of this Court ...

Jun 13 2000

A. Byanna Vs. Ramakrishnappa and others

  • Decided on : 13-Jun-2000

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2001(3)KarLJ28

... City of Bangalore' means the area for the time being included for the Metropolitan area comprising the Bangalore City declared in the Section 8 of the Cr. P.C., 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974)'. City of Bangalore is also defined by sub-section (aa) of Section 2 of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 (Act of 1964). City of Bangalore shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act ... Civil Courts Act, 1964 (Act of 1964). City of Bangalore shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act,1979.8. The said map published by the Government of Karnataka under its Notification No. LAW 247, LCI 8037, dated 10-11-1980 indicates that the suit village 'Horamavu Agara' is located within the territorial limits of the jurisdiction of the Bangalore City Civil Court ... Bangalore City Civil and Sessions Court published by the Government for the purpose of fixing the territorial jurisdiction of the Bangalore City Civil Court as defined by sub-section (aa) under Section 2 of the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, 1979, contended that the finding of the Court ...

Mar 16 2004

Globe Congeneration Power Limited Vs. Sri Hiranyakeshi Sahakari Sakker ...

  • Decided on : 16-Mar-2004

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant94; 2005(1)ARBLR502(Kar); ILR2004KAR2045; 2004(7)KarLJ124

... by means of Arbitration in Bangalore and also provided that the Courts of Bangalore have jurisdiction to entertain disputes under the agreement.3. The appellant alleging that the respondent had acted arbitrarily and was not amenable to peaceful negotiations, preferred an application under Section 9 of the Act before the Court of City Civil and Session Judge, Bangalore for interim measures to ... a Court.7. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties, the only point that arises for decision is whether the Court of Principal City Civil and Sessions Court at Bangalore has jurisdiction to entertain the petition filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Act.8. Section 9 of the Act reads as follows:'9. Interim measures etc. by Court - A ... Bangalore as agreed to by the parties, but, the parties cannot by their agreement confer jurisdiction on a Court.7. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties, the only point that arises for decision is whether the Court of Principal City Civil and Sessions Court at Bangalore has jurisdiction to entertain the petition filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Act ... Act, 1956 and having its registered office at 201, T.V. Industrial Estate, Worli, Mumbai-400 025, is directed against the order dated 25.08.2003 in Arbitration Application No. 40 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the VI Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, (for short, Bangalore Court) dismissing the application filed by the appellant herein under Section 9 of the Act ...

Nov 10 1987

Syed Abdul Wadood and etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Anr., etc.

  • Decided on : 10-Nov-1987

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1988Kant194; ILR1987KAR3679; 1987(3)KarLJ549

... Court, Bangalore City. He seeks a declaration that Courts of Small Causes, Bangalore City, have no jurisdiction, under the Karnataka Small Cause Courts Act, 1964,under the Act or under the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, 1978 to try HRC cases under S. 21 of the Act. He further seeks a declaration that S. 29(4) of the Act ... City of the State. Apart from this, Bangalore has attracted several big industries. Its population is ever-growing, bringing with it, the problem of housing, the vast number. The constitution of subordinate courts for Bangalore City, is governed by Bangalore City Civil Courts Act. The Litigants of Bangalore are subject of special legislation with different kinds of Courts to entertain their civil ... courts for Bangalore City, is governed by Bangalore City Civil Courts Act. The Litigants of Bangalore are subject of special legislation with different kinds of Courts to entertain their civil disputes.12. Having regard to its peculiar position and its problems, law has provided for an early culmination of the litigation by vesting the revisional jurisdiction in the High Court itself under the Act ...

Jan 11 1983

K.N. Panjawani Vs. T.N.K. Nayar and Anr.

  • Decided on : 11-Jan-1983

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1984Kant140

... City Civil' Court in Bangalore City and the District Courts in the mofussil places are the only Courts of ordinary original civil jurisdiction. These two provisions would show that even by implication this Court cannot be considered to be a Court of ordinary original civil jurisdiction.16. Then the learned counsel Shri Devadas contended that the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964, and the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act ... Court. The business of this Court is regulated by Karnataka Act 5 of 1962. Whatever be the extraordinary situation, this Court cannot assume to itself ordinary original civil jurisdiction. Therefore. the said argument advanced by Shri Devadas also fails.18. Before parting with this case, I would like to say a few words. Unfortunately under the Bangalore City Civil Court Act, 1979 and the Karnataka Civil Courts Act ... Court of ordinary original civil jurisdiction.16. Then the learned counsel Shri Devadas contended that the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964, and the Bangalore City Civil Courts Act, 1979, do not make any provision for the appointment of a vacation Judge during winter vacation and Dasara vacation. Thus, according to him the extraordinary situation arising on account of not providing for a vacation Judge by the said Acts ...

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //