Skip to content


Delhi Recent Court Judgments Home Recent Delhi Page 1 of about 47,695 results (0.022 seconds)

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

Krown Agro Foods Pvt. Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Ta ...

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:26. h March, 2015 Judgment pronounced on:27. h March 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.5330/2014 KROWN AGRO FOODS PVT. LIMITED ..... Petitioner versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE5(1) NEW DELHI ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr K.R. Manjani, Advocate For the Respondent: Ms Suruchi Aggarwal with Mr Shashank Menon and Mr Aamir Aziz, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The petitioner, by way of the present writ petition, has challenged the order dated 23.06.2014 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax disposing of the objections filed by the petitioner against issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the very issuance of the notice dated 18.03.2014. ===================================================================== W.P.(C) 5330/2014...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Phool Babu and Ors

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 27, 2015 LPA4752014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus MOHD. MUNNA & ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. LPA5032014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ABDUL BARIK AND ORS Represented by: LPA Nos.475, 503 to 514 of 2014 ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate + LPA5042014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ARVIND KUMAR AND ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate for ...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Phool Chand Verma and Ors

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 27, 2015 LPA4752014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus MOHD. MUNNA & ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. LPA5032014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ABDUL BARIK AND ORS Represented by: LPA Nos.475, 503 to 514 of 2014 ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate + LPA5042014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ARVIND KUMAR AND ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate for ...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

Ms. Lalita Vs. North Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2970/2015 & C.M.No.5313/2015 (Stay) 27th March, 2015 % MS. LALITA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.M.Rais Farooqui, Advocate. versus NORTH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pratap Singh, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner in this case seeks appointment as an Assistant Teacher (Primary) with the respondent no.2/School, however, admittedly petitioner does not have the qualification of Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET) which is required for being appointed as a Primary Teacher in the School.2. I have considered this aspect in the judgment in the case of Ruchika Arora & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. in W.P.(C) No.2544/2013 decided on 22.4.2013, and in which judgment I have held that if a person does not have CTET qualification which is required by virtue of notification issued under the Right of Chi...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Sharma Prasad and Ors

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 27, 2015 LPA4752014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus MOHD. MUNNA & ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. LPA5032014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ABDUL BARIK AND ORS Represented by: LPA Nos.475, 503 to 514 of 2014 ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate + LPA5042014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ARVIND KUMAR AND ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate for ...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Lal Bahadur and Ors

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 27, 2015 LPA4752014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus MOHD. MUNNA & ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. LPA5032014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ABDUL BARIK AND ORS Represented by: LPA Nos.475, 503 to 514 of 2014 ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate + LPA5042014 M/S EXPLICIT LEATHERS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sameer Jain, Mr.Ekank Mehra and Ms.Diksha Dua, Advocates. versus SH. ARVIND KUMAR AND ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Katrickay Mathur & Mr.R.D.Dubey Advocates for R-1. Mr.Vijay Chandra Jha and Ms.Sonia Sharma, Advocate for ...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

Guru Harkrishan Public School Through Its Managing Vs. Directorate of ...

Court : Delhi

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.8058/2011 & C.M.No.20480/2014 27th March, 2015 % GURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL THROUGH ITS MANAGING COMMITTEE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate. Versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Bandana Shukla, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. T.N. Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. As detailed hereinafter, a very difficult position has arisen in the facts of the present case because of two different judgments passed by two different learned Single Judges of this Court on the interpretation of Rule 121 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules,1973).2. By the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner/School had challenged the judgment of the Delhi ...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

Volkswagen India Pvt Ltd Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. 03.2015 % + Judgment delivered on:27. 03.2015 W.P. (C) 3022/2014 MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD ..... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner : Mr Balbir Singh with Mr Atul Gupta, Mr T. D.Satish, Mr Angad Sandhu, Mr B. Mansatta and Mr Rupinder Simhar For the Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr Manish Mohan with Mr Gaurav Sharma, Ms Manisha Rana Singh, Ms Hina Shaheen and Ms Sidhi Arora For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Gopal Jain, Sr Advocate with Mr Ratheesh M. + W.P.(C) 3023/2014 VOLKSWAGEN INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner : Mr Balbir Singh with Mr Atul Gupta, Mr T. D.Satish, Mr Angad Sandhu, Mr B. Mansatta and Mr Rupinder Simhar For the Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr Manish Mohan with Mr Gaurav Sharma, Ms Manisha Rana Singh, Ms Hina Shaheen and Ms Sidhi Arora For the Respondent No....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

Volkswagen India Pvt Ltd Vs. The Designated Authority and Ors

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. 03.2015 % + Judgment delivered on:27. 03.2015 W.P. (C) 3022/2014 MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD ..... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner : Mr Balbir Singh with Mr Atul Gupta, Mr T. D.Satish, Mr Angad Sandhu, Mr B. Mansatta and Mr Rupinder Simhar For the Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr Manish Mohan with Mr Gaurav Sharma, Ms Manisha Rana Singh, Ms Hina Shaheen and Ms Sidhi Arora For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Gopal Jain, Sr Advocate with Mr Ratheesh M. + W.P.(C) 3023/2014 VOLKSWAGEN INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner : Mr Balbir Singh with Mr Atul Gupta, Mr T. D.Satish, Mr Angad Sandhu, Mr B. Mansatta and Mr Rupinder Simhar For the Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr Manish Mohan with Mr Gaurav Sharma, Ms Manisha Rana Singh, Ms Hina Shaheen and Ms Sidhi Arora For the Respondent No....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

Sachin Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h MARCH, 2015 DECIDED ON :27. h MARCH, 2015 + CRL.A. 185/2012 SACHIN Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Anu Narula, Advocate with Mr.Kunal Aurora, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. AND + CRL.A. 838/2010 KRISHAN KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Anu Narula, Advocate with Mr.Kunal Aurora, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellants Sachin (A-1) and Krishan Kumar (A-2) impugn a judgment dated 05.10.2009 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.65/08 emanating from FIR No.212/08 PS Kashmiri Gate, by which they were held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 363/366A/34 IPC read with Section 376 (2)(g) IPC. By an order dated 07.10.2009, they were sentenced to undergo RI for three years with fine ` 100/- each under Sections 363/34 IPC;...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //