Skip to content


Delhi Recent Court Judgments Home Recent Delhi Page 1 of about 48,188 results (0.023 seconds)

May 01 2015 (HC)

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Vs. Dr. Smit Rajput and Ors

Court : Delhi

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t May, 2015 % + LPA No.551/2013 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Mr. Sradhananda Mohapatra and Mr. Vipin Singh, Advs. Versus DR. SMIT RAJPUT & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Goel and Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Advs. for R-1 to 8. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Adv. for R-9/GNCTD. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Sandhya Raghav, Advs. for R-10/DU. Mrs. Suparna Srivastava, Mr. Kumar Harsh and Mr. Neelmani Pant, Advs. for R-11/UOI. Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Manan Khera and Mr. Vishu Agarwal, Advs. for R-12/MCI. Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Bina Madhavan, Ms. Akanksha Mehra, Mr. Udai Rathore and Mr. Laksh Puri, Advs. for R-23. AND + LPA No.170/2014 DR. KUSHAL AGRAWAL & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Manoj Goel and Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Advs. Versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Mr. Sradhananda Mohapatra and Mr. Vipin Sin...

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2015 (HC)

Dr. Kushal Agrawal and Ors Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Univers ...

Court : Delhi

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t May, 2015 % + LPA No.551/2013 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Mr. Sradhananda Mohapatra and Mr. Vipin Singh, Advs. Versus DR. SMIT RAJPUT & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Goel and Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Advs. for R-1 to 8. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Adv. for R-9/GNCTD. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Sandhya Raghav, Advs. for R-10/DU. Mrs. Suparna Srivastava, Mr. Kumar Harsh and Mr. Neelmani Pant, Advs. for R-11/UOI. Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Manan Khera and Mr. Vishu Agarwal, Advs. for R-12/MCI. Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Bina Madhavan, Ms. Akanksha Mehra, Mr. Udai Rathore and Mr. Laksh Puri, Advs. for R-23. AND + LPA No.170/2014 DR. KUSHAL AGRAWAL & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Manoj Goel and Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Advs. Versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Mr. Sradhananda Mohapatra and Mr. Vipin Sin...

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2015 (HC)

Aspire Investments Pvt Ltd Vs. Nexgen Edusolutions Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 6, 2015 Decision on: May 1, 2015 O.M.P. 1349/2014 ASPIRE INVESTMENTS PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. T.K. Ganju, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atish Dipankar, Advocate. versus NEXGEN EDUSOLUTIONS PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sangram Patnaik, Mr. Vikramjeet and Ms. Tehrina Hussain, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % JUDGMENT0105.2015 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, (Act), by the Petitioner Aspire Investments Pvt. Ltd. (ASPL) is to an interim Award dated 26 th June 2014 passed by the sole Arbitrator dismissing the application filed by the Petitioner under Order XII Rule 6 CPC read with Section 31 of the Act. Background 2. The background to the present petition is that the premises at Flat Nos. F601608 and F610619 on the 6th Floor of Aditya Tower Building, Plot No.5, Laxmi Nagar, District Centre, Delhi was given on lease by the Petitioner t...

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2015 (HC)

Mohan Nair Vs. Rajiv Gupta and Ors

Court : Delhi

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t May, 2015 % + LPA No.364/2014 MOHAN NAIR Through: .. Appellant Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Adv. Versus RAJIV GUPTA & ORS. Through: .. Respondents Mr. Sunil Magon, Adv. for R-1 to 3. Mr. Vivek B. Saharya, Adv. for R4/NDMC. Mr. Sanjeev Goyal and Mr. Abhjoy Banerjee, Advs. for R-5 with S.I. Bishambar Dayal. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 14 th March, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court, of disposal of Cont. Cas (C) No.148/2014 filed by the appellant with liberty to the appellant to seek his civil remedies against the respondents.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and replies have been filed on behalf of respondents No.1&2, respondent No.3 and respondent No.4. We heard the counsel for the appellant, the counsel for the respondents No.1 to 3 and the counsel for the respondent no.4/NDMC. The respondent No.5 is the Sub In...

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2015 (HC)

Ram Karan Pathak Vs. State

Court : Delhi

$~R-2AB * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 24.03.2015 01.05.2015 Crl.A. 155/2008 RAM KARAN PATHAK Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocates. STATE ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30.01.2008 passed by the learned Special Judge in C.C. No.28/2002, arising out of FIR No.2/2001, convicting the Appellant for the offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) and the order on sentence dated 31.08.2008, whereby-for the offence under Section 7, PC Act, the appellant/ accused was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for three months, and, for the offence under Section 13(2), PC Act, the appellant had further been sentenced to...

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2015 (HC)

Mahendra Sinsinwar Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on : April 28, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : May 01, 2015 W.P.(C) 7371/2014 MAHENDRA SINSINWAR Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.K.C.Mittal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Bhagwan Swaroop Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Ajay Choudhary, Advocate for UOI W.P.(C) 7373/2014 GIRDHARI LAL Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.K.C.Mittal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Bhagwan Swaroop Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Ajay Choudhary, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Mahendra Sinsinwar was enrolled as a constable (GD) in the Border Security Force (BSF) on March 30, 1999. Girdhari Lal was enrolled as a constable (GD) on April 01, 1987 in BSF.2. Mahendra Sinsinwar was sent on deputation to Intelligence Bureau (IB) on May 25, 1999. Girdhari Lal was sent on deputation to Intelligence Bureau ...

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2015 (HC)

Girdhari Lal Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on : April 28, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : May 01, 2015 W.P.(C) 7371/2014 MAHENDRA SINSINWAR Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.K.C.Mittal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Bhagwan Swaroop Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Ajay Choudhary, Advocate for UOI W.P.(C) 7373/2014 GIRDHARI LAL Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.K.C.Mittal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Bhagwan Swaroop Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Ajay Choudhary, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Mahendra Sinsinwar was enrolled as a constable (GD) in the Border Security Force (BSF) on March 30, 1999. Girdhari Lal was enrolled as a constable (GD) on April 01, 1987 in BSF.2. Mahendra Sinsinwar was sent on deputation to Intelligence Bureau (IB) on May 25, 1999. Girdhari Lal was sent on deputation to Intelligence Bureau ...

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2015 (HC)

M/S Gail India Limited Vs. M/S Avinash Em Projects Pvt. Ltd

Court : Delhi

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t May, 2015 % + LPA No.242/2015 M/S GAIL INDIA LIMITED .... Appellant Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Pragyan Sharma, Ms. Kanika Tandon & Mr. Gaurav Chaudhary, Advs. Versus M/S AVINASH EM PROJECTS PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kakra with Mr. Bheem Sen Jain, Advs. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 6th February, 2015 of the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.2041/2014 preferred by the respondent. The counsel for the respondent appeared on advance notice when the appeal came up before us on 24 th April, 2015 and with the consent of the counsels, the appeal was heard finally and judgment reserved.2. The respondent filed the writ petition from which this appeal arises impugning the order dated 18th March, 2014 of the appellant whereby the respondent was banned for an indefini...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2015 (HC)

Vls Finance Ltd Vs. Southend Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and Anr

Court : Delhi

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:10. h March, 2015 Judgment Delivered on:30. h April, 2015 % + FAO(OS) 82/2015 VLS FINANCE LTD ..... APPELLANT VERSUS SOUTHEND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD & ANR ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: For the Respondent: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi, Mr. Samit Khosla, Mr. Chetan Sharma and Mr. Ashok Kr. Sharma, Advocates. Mr. Ashwani Kumar Matta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit Auluck, Ms Manjula Baxla and Mr. Raghav, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay K. Sondhi, Mr. Venancio D Costa, Mr. Ashish Kr. Singh and Mr. Harshed Pathak, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 The controversy as of now that has arisen is whether from the impugned order an intra court appeal would lie under section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2015 (HC)

Puri Construction P. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. and Anr ...

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 12.2014 Pronounced on:30. 04.2015 + FAO(OS) 21/2009 PURI CONSTRUCTION P. LTD. AND ORS Appellants. Versus LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD. AND ANR. + ..Respondents FAO(OS) 22/2009 MOHINDER PURI Appellant Versus LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD. AND ANR. + ..Respondents FAO(OS) 23/2009 PURI CONSTRUCTION P. LTD. AND ORS Appellants. Versus LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD. AND ANR. + ..Respondents FAO(OS) 194/2009 M/S. LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD. Appellant Versus PURI CONSTRUCTION LTD. AND ORS. . ..Respondents Through: Sh. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with FAO (OS) 21/2009 AND CONNECTED CASES Page 1 Sh. M.R. Shamshad, Sh. Shashank Singh and Sh. Abdullah Umar, Advocates, for petitioner in FAO(OS)21/2009 and FAO(OS)23/2009 and respondent in FAO(OS)194/2009. Sh. Ram Jethmalani, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Neeraj Malhotra and Sh. P. Garg, Advocates, for appellant in FAO(OS)22/2009 and Respondent No.3 in FAO(OS)194/2009. Sh. Ashok. H. Desai, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Sameer Parekh, Ms...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //