Skip to content


Supreme Recent Court Judgments Home Recent Supreme Page 1 of about 77,820 results (0.014 seconds)

Jan 30 2015 (SC)

Cellular Operators Asscn. of India and Ors Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1563 OF2007CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA & ORS. ... APPELLANTS VERSUS TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.This appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the order dated 22nd December, 2006 passed by the Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') in Appeal No.2 of 2006 (with M.A. No.58 of 2006). By the impugned order, the Tribunal while dismissing the appeal disposed of the M.A.No.58 of 2006 with certain observations.2. The factual matrix of the case is as follows: Appellant Nos.2 to 10 are private GSM cellular operators and the first appellant is their Association. They have been issued licences by the Central Government, Department of Telecommunication (hereinafter referred to as 'DoT') under Section 4 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 to establish, maintain an...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2015 (SC)

C Sukumaran Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.192 of 2015 (S.L.P (Crl.) No.9835 of 2014) C. SUKUMARAN ....APPELLANT VS. STATE OF KERALA .....RESPONDENT JUDGMENT V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.Leave granted. This appeal is filed by the appellant against the impugned judgment and order dated 22.05.2014 passed by the High Court of Kerala, at Ernakulam in Criminal Appeal No.108 of 2001, whereby the High Court has partly allowed the appeal of the appellant and upheld the order of conviction recorded by the Court of Ld. Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thiruvananthapuram, vide its judgment and order dated 30.01.2001 in C.C No.63 of 1999 and convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') with rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo si...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2015 (SC)

Keshavlal Khemchand and Sons Pvt Ltd and Ors Vs. Union of India and Or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.901 OF2014KESHAVLAL KHEMCHAND AND SONS PVT. LTD. & OTHERS ... Petitioners Versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (C) No.902 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.903 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.904 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.905 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.907 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.925 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.926 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.937 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.938 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.939 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.940 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.945 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.946 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.947 OF2014WRIT PETITION (C) No.948 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL No.1230 OF2015(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.2230 of 2014) CIVIL APPEAL No.1231 OF2015(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.12008 of 2014) CIVIL APPEAL No.1233 OF2015(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.12153 of 2014) CIVIL APPEAL No.1234 OF2015(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.12233 of 2014) CIVIL APPEAL No.1235 OF2...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2015 (SC)

Patel Jathabhai Punajbhai Vs. North Gujarat University and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.474 OF2013Patel Jathabhai Punajbhai ... Appellant(s) Vs. North Gujarat University & Anr. ... Respondents WITH C.A. No.475/2013; C.A. No.476/2013; C.A. No.477/2013; C.A. No.478/2013; C.A. No.482/2013; C.A. No.483/2013; C.A. No.484/2013; C.A. No.485/2013; C.A. No.487/2013; C.A. No.514/2013; C.A. No.515/2013; C.A. No.517/2013; C.A. No.518/2013; C.A. No.519/2013; C.A. No.520/2013; C.A. No.521/2013; C.A. No.522/2013; C.A. No.523/2013; C.A. No.526/2013; C.A. No.527/2013; C.A. No.528/2013; C.A. No.529/2013; C.A. No.1339/2013; and S.L.P. [C]. Nos.16925-16936/2013. JUDGMENT ARUN MISHRA, J.1. The appeals arise out of the third group of matters wherein a common judgment and order dated 7.8.2012 has been passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, determining the compensation for agricultural land at the rate of Rs.60/- per sq.m. and for non-agricultural land at the rate of Rs.78/- per sq.m. situated at...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2015 (SC)

Shri Westarly Dkhar and Ors Vs. Shri Sehekaya Lyngdoh

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1232 OF2015[Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.16099 of 2012]. Shri Westarly Dkhar & Ors. .......Appellants Versus Shri Sehekaya Lyngdoh ........Respondent JUDGMENT R.F.Nariman, J.Special leave granted.2. The instant appeal by way of a Special Leave to Appeal has been filed against the judgment and final order dated April 27, 2012 passed by the High Court of Gauhati, Shillong Bench at Shillong in Civil Revision Petition No.18 (SH) of 2010 filed by the Respondent.3. The appeal arises out of an ex-parte ad-interim injunction passed by the Subordinate District Council Court in a suit instituted by the Respondent, which is registered as Title Suit No.16 of 2009. On 30th September, 2009, an ad-interim ex-parte injunction was granted by the Subordinate District Council Court, in the following terms: "On careful perusal of the same, I am satisfied that there is an urgency in the matter for restraining the opposit...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2015 (SC)

Jage Ram and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.92/2015 JAGE RAM & ORS. ..Appellants Versus STATE OF HARYANA ..Respondent JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 19.8.2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No.181 SB of 2000, whereby the High Court partly allowed the appeal filed by the appellants thereby confirming the conviction of the appellants with certain modifications.2. Briefly stated, case of the prosecution is that on the fateful day i.e. 18.11.1994, at about 8.00 A.M. in the morning the complainant Jagdish (PW-5) along with his two sons namely Sukhbir and Mange Ram (PW-6) were busy in cutting pullas (reeds) from the dola of their field. At that time, Jage Ram (A-1) and his sons Rajbir Singh @ Raju (A-2), Rakesh (A-3) and Madan (A-4) armed with jaily, pharsi and lathis respectively, entered the land where the complainant was working with his sons and asked them not ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2015 (SC)

A.C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.73 OF2007A.C. NARAYANAN ... APPELLANT V/s STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1437 OF2013SHRI G. KAMALAKAR ... APPELLANT V/s M/S SURANA SECURITIES LTD. & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.As the question of law involved is common in both the appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. Criminal Appeal No.73 of 2007 2. Brief facts of the case are as follows: The accused-appellant,A.C. Narayanan challenged the common order dated 29th November, 2000 passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 9th Court, Bandra, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as the, 'Trial Court') by filing applications u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the High Court. By the said common order the applications preferred by the appellant-A.C.Narayanan for discharge/recalling process against him was rejected by th...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2015 (SC)

Union of India and Anr Vs. Sova Ispat Limited and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1182 of 2015 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.431 of 2015) Union of India & Another ... Appellants Versus Sova Ispat Limited & Others ...Respondents JUDGMENT Chelameswar, J.1. Leave granted.2. Aggrieved by an interim order passed by the High Court of Calcutta in AST No.432 of 2014 dated 23.12.2014, the respondents 1 and 2 therein preferred the instant appeal. The relevant portion of the order reads as follows:- "As the writ application has been admitted and as affidavits have been called for and as the constitutionality of the said Ordinance is under challenge, any auction conducted by the respondents, in respect of the Ardhagram coal block, as incorporated under serial No.19 of the allotment list in Annexure-II of the memorandum dated 18th December, 2014, shall abide by the result of the writ application. In the event any such auction is held, the instant order should be indicated in...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2015 (SC)

Pathubha Govindji Rathod and Anr Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2282 OF2014Pathubha Govindji Rathod & Anr ... Appellants Versus State of Gujarat ... Respondent JUDGMENT PRAFULLA C. PANT, J.This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 30.6.2014 passed by High Court of Gujarat whereby the said Court has partly allowed the criminal appeals arisen out of Sessions Case No.85 of 2003 and the cross Sessions Case No.53 of 2004, which were decided by two separate orders of the same date, i.e., 5.10.2007 by Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court, Junagarh. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Prosecution story, in brief, is that complainant Satish Jotva (PW-42) used to live with his family in Village Arena. On 2.9.2003 his uncle Bhurabhai Jivabhai (PW-46) was going to his field on a bicycle. At about 10.30 a.m., he was intercepted by Pathubha Govindji Rathod (appellant No.1) near bus stand. Accused/appellant no.1 picked up a quarr...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2015 (SC)

Karnail Kaur and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. No.8 of 2014 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.7424 OF2013KARNAIL KAUR & ORS. .........APPELLANTS Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .........RESPONDENTS with I.A. No.5 in Civil Appeal No.7425 of 2013 I.A. No.19 of Civil Appeal No.7426 of 2013 I.A. No.15 in Civil Appeal No.7427 of 2013 I.A. No.3 in Civil Appeal No.7428 of 2013 I.A. No.3 in Civil Appeal No.7429 of 2013 I.A. No.3 in Civil Appeal No.7430 of 2013 I.A. No.6 in Civil Appeal No.7431 of 2013 I.A. No.3 in Civil Appeal No.7432 of 2013 I.A. No.3 in Civil Appeal No.7433 of 2013 I.A. No.3 in Civil Appeal No.7435 of 2013 I.A.Nos.3-4 in Civil Appeal Nos.7437-7438 of 2013 I.A. Nos.6-8 in Civil Appeal Nos.7439-7441 of 2013 I.A. No.5 in Civil Appeal No.7444 of 2013 and I.A. No.6 in Civil Appeal No.7445 of 2013 JUDGMENT V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.The abovementioned applications are filed by the appellants for allowing the concerned appeals in terms of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compe...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //