Skip to content


Latest Judgments Page 3 of about 71,007 results (0.009 seconds)

Dec 15 2014 (HC)

Apex Traders Vs. Satnam Sales Corporation and Ors

Court : Delhi

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2425/2010 Decided on:15. h December, 2014 % APEX TRADERS Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Abhinash Kr. Mishra, Mr. S.S. Mishra, Advs. versus SATNAM SALES CORPORATION & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mohd. Zahid, Adv. for R-2&3. Mr.Yogesh Verma, APP for State. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner filed a complaint before the learned ACMM impleading the respondents No.1 to 4 as accused. The complainant alleged that in the month of June/July 2007 since he was in need of scrap he checked certain websites including Alibaba.com. There he came across the number of respondent No.4 Abhinav Goel who introduced the petitioner with respondents No.1 to 3 and that they were dealers in ferrous and non-ferrous scrap metals. Respondent No.2&3 representing to be partners of respondent No.1 agreed to supply H.R./C.R. cutting 250.m.t. @ `18,700/- m.t. in a lot of 100 m.t. The delivery of the aforesaid items were agree...

Tag this Judgment!
Dec 12 2014 (HC)

Lekan Akins Vs. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.483 of 2014 Reserved on: December 1, 2014 Decision on: December 12, 2014 LEKAN AKINS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.S. Kushwaha, Advocate. versus THE STATE (N.C.T of Delhi) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1212.2014 Introduction 1. The challenge in this appeal is to the impugned judgment dated 18th January 2014 passed by the learned Special Judge, Delhi in Session Case No.14/11 convicting the Appellant, Lekan Akins, for the offence under Section 21 (c) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 (NDPS Act) and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act (FA) and the order on sentence dated 24th January 2014 whereby for the offence under Section 21 (c) NDPS Act the Appellant had been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a period of ten years and fine of Rs. 1 lakh, and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for a period of two years and for the offence unde...

Tag this Judgment!
Dec 12 2014 (HC)

Lekan Akins Vs. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.483 of 2014 Reserved on: December 1, 2014 Decision on: December 12, 2014 LEKAN AKINS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.S. Kushwaha, Advocate. versus THE STATE (N.C.T of Delhi) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1212.2014 Introduction 1. The challenge in this appeal is to the impugned judgment dated 18th January 2014 passed by the learned Special Judge, Delhi in Session Case No.14/11 convicting the Appellant, Lekan Akins, for the offence under Section 21 (c) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 (NDPS Act) and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act (FA) and the order on sentence dated 24th January 2014 whereby for the offence under Section 21 (c) NDPS Act the Appellant had been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a period of ten years and fine of Rs. 1 lakh, and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for a period of two years and for the offence unde...

Tag this Judgment!
Dec 12 2014 (HC)

Frank Kingsley Ugochukwu and Anr. Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intellig ...

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t December 2014 Decision on:12th December 2014 CRL.A. No.1173 of 2010 FRANK KINGSLEY UGOCHUKWU & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Yogesh Saxena, Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..........Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1212.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 14th July 2010 passed by the learned Special Judge in SC No.26-A/2006 convicting the Appellants under Section 21(c) and Section 29 read with Section 21 of the Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) and the order on sentence dated 17th July 2010 whereby each of them were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) of ten years and fine of Rs.1,00,000 each and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for each of the offences under Section 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. The sentences were directed to run concurrently. The case of the prose...

Tag this Judgment!
Dec 12 2014 (HC)

Frank Kingsley Ugochukwu and Anr. Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intellige ...

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t December 2014 Decision on:12th December 2014 CRL.A. No.1173 of 2010 FRANK KINGSLEY UGOCHUKWU & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Yogesh Saxena, Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..........Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1212.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 14th July 2010 passed by the learned Special Judge in SC No.26-A/2006 convicting the Appellants under Section 21(c) and Section 29 read with Section 21 of the Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) and the order on sentence dated 17th July 2010 whereby each of them were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) of ten years and fine of Rs.1,00,000 each and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for each of the offences under Section 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. The sentences were directed to run concurrently. The case of the prose...

Tag this Judgment!
Dec 12 2014 (HC)

Heera Lal @ Heera Vs. State Govt. of Nct

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 08, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 12, 2014 % + CRL.A. 979/2012 HEERA LAL @ HEERA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr.Shiv Chopra and Ms.Megha, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Rajeev Vimal, PS Kalyan Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Heera Lal is convicted of the offence of robbery and murder of Jagan Singh Chauhan and awarded imprisonment for life.2. The case of prosecution rest on circumstantial evidence in the form of statements of Umesh Chauhan PW-1 and Tushar Chauhan PW-2 having last seen Heera Lal with the deceased on the night of June 07, 2010, recovery of shirt of Heera Lal which was found to be blood stained with human blood of B group origin which tallied with that of deceased and the recovery of weapon of offence an iron r...

Tag this Judgment!
Dec 12 2014 (HC)

Hirein Sharma Vs. Jyoti Rajput and Ors.

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h December, 2014 + CRL.A.1394/2012 HIREIN SHARMA Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Meena Chaudhary Sharma and Mr. B.S. Tomar, Advocates along with the appellant in person versus JYOTI RAJPUT & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Narender Sharma and Mr. Sidharth Pandit, Advocates for R-1&2 Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for R-3/State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Unsuccessful complainant in case relating to offence punishable u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short NI Act) is the appellant herein. He filed CC No.482/2010 before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate against the accused alleging offence under Section 138 of the NI Act on the ground that he and his mother had inducted the accused/respondent No.1, director of Respondent 2 company as a tenant in about 1000 ft. area on the third floor of premises in Vikas Tower, Plot No.6, Sector-8, Rohini w.e.f. 1st October 2005 by a registered rent...

Tag this Judgment!
Dec 12 2014 (HC)

Radhey Shyam Bagla (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs Vs. Smt Ratni Devi Kahnan ...

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 12.2013 Pronounced on:12. 12.2014 + RFA (OS) 5/1982 RADHEY SHYAM BAGLA (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS ..... Appellants Through: Sh. Suryakant Singla, Advocate. Versus SMT. RATNI DEVI KAHNANI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Rajeev Sharma with Sh. Harmeet Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in Suit No.446 of 1967, dated 10.12.1981, i.e., by which the learned Single Judge had granted a preliminary decree of partition.2. At the outset, it is essential to trace the relationships between the various parties involved. The core issue in the judgment of the Single Judge turned upon the reading of the will of one Seth Ram Lal Khemka. Seth Ram Lal Khemka had a sister, Smt. Godavari Devi. The appellant, Shri Radhey Shyam Bagla (first ...

Tag this Judgment!
Dec 12 2014 (HC)

Radhey Shyam Bagla (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs Vs. Smt Ratni Devi Kahna ...

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 12.2013 Pronounced on:12. 12.2014 + RFA (OS) 5/1982 RADHEY SHYAM BAGLA (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS ..... Appellants Through: Sh. Suryakant Singla, Advocate. Versus SMT. RATNI DEVI KAHNANI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Rajeev Sharma with Sh. Harmeet Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in Suit No.446 of 1967, dated 10.12.1981, i.e., by which the learned Single Judge had granted a preliminary decree of partition.2. At the outset, it is essential to trace the relationships between the various parties involved. The core issue in the judgment of the Single Judge turned upon the reading of the will of one Seth Ram Lal Khemka. Seth Ram Lal Khemka had a sister, Smt. Godavari Devi. The appellant, Shri Radhey Shyam Bagla (first ...

Tag this Judgment!
Dec 12 2014 (HC)

Ranjeet Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

$~5, 6 &13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 12, 2014 + CRL.A. 1317/2014 RANJEET KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector K.K.Tiwari, PS Tughlak Road. CRL.A. 1440/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector K.K.Tiwari, PS Tughlak Road. versus RANJEET KUMAR & ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Ajay Verma and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates. CRL.A. 1487/2014 KANHAIYA & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Ajay Verma and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates. versus STATE Represented by: CRL.A. 1317/2014 & conn.matters ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.B.10565/2014 in Crl.A.1317/2014 Crl.M.B.10849-50/2014 in Crl.A.1487/2014 Since ...

Tag this Judgment!
Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //