Skip to content


Latest Judgments Home  Latest Judgments  Sorted by:recent  Court:Delhi  Page:3

Nov 07 2014

T. Muralidhar Vs. Pvr Murthy

  • Decided on : 07-Nov-2014

Court : Delhi

$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA (OS) No.115/2014 & CM No.12344/2014 Reserved on:22. d September, 2014 Date of Decision:7. h November, 2014 T. MURALIDHAR Through : versus ..... Appellant Mr. Suman Doval, Adv. PVR MURTHY ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Ankit Jain and Mr. Nimesh Chib, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR GITA MITTAL, J1 What is not the pleaded, cannot be proved, what is admitted need not be proved. It is this fundamental principle which binds every court. It is this very principle which shall be violated if the present appeal is accepted.2. On the 28th of July, 2009, the appellant had filed CS(OS)No.1397/2009 against the respondent. For the purpose of convenience, we propose to refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant in the present judgment. Besides the residual prayer, the plaintiff sought the following prayers:a) Pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant directing the defendant to exec...
Nov 07 2014

Balli Vs. Kallo Devi & Anr

  • Decided on : 07-Nov-2014

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:26. h September, 2014 Judgment pronounced on:7. h November, 2014 % + I.A. No.13520/2014 in CS(OS) 2196/2014 BALLI Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Anuj Kumar Garg, Adv. versus KALLO DEVI & ANR Through ..... Defendants Mr.S.N.Kalra, Adv. for D-1. Ms.R.S.Bobde, Adv. with Ms.Mrinalini Sen Gupta, Adv. for D-2/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present suit for permanent injunction has been filed by the plaintiff in respect of the suit property i.e. F-268, Kot Kumhar Basti, Hauz Rani, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi- 110017 against the defendants i.e. Smt. Kallo Devi, defendant No.1 and DDA, defendant No.2.2. It is the case of the plaintiff that he being a bonafide purchaser of the suit property has been staying in the suit property for last more than 30 years along with his family. The suit property being old, needed repair work, which was initiated by the plaintiff. However, defendant No.1, a property de...
Nov 05 2014

Anil K. Aggarwal Vs. Union of India & Anr.

  • Decided on : 05-Nov-2014

Court : Delhi

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h November, 2014 % + WP(C) No.6792/2014 ANIL K. AGGARWAL Through: .... Petitioner Petitioner in person. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Akshay Makhija, Ms. Pallavi Shali, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Ms. Anu Bagai, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) claims the following reliefs:A. issue writ of or in the nature of mandamus and / or any other appropriate writs, orders, directions directing the courts, tribunal and other judicial authorities within the jurisdiction of the Honble High Court of Delhi to appoint notaries registered and holding valid certificate of practice issued under the Notary Act, 1952 to act and function as Commissioner for recording of evidences in any civil or criminal trial; and not to ap...
Nov 05 2014

Pardeep Dev Vs. State

  • Decided on : 05-Nov-2014

Court : Delhi

$~R-51 & 52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 05, 2014 + CRL.A.729/2011 PARDEEP DEV Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Arundhati Katju, Advocate with Mr.Akshay Sharma, Advocate along with appellant produced in custody. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Ashok Giri CRL.A.172/2014 VISHNU VISHWAS Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Arundhati Katju, Advocate with Mr.Akshay Sharma, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Appellant Pardeep Dev in Crl.Appeal No.729/2011 has been produced in Court pursuant to the order dated November 03, 2014. His production was sought in Court because his counsel was not appearing in the appeal despite the appeal being on the Board for final hearing in the expedited list and having reached for hearing thrice, but not heard because of no represent...
Nov 03 2014

Sonu Vs. State

  • Decided on : 03-Nov-2014

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 15, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 03, 2014 % + CRL.A.781/2011 AFZAL SHA @ SURAJ ALI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 784/2011 AJAY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 1270/2013 SONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: CRL.A.No.781/2011 & conn.matters ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Page 1 of 11 Kashmere Gate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J...
Nov 03 2014

Green Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors

  • Decided on : 03-Nov-2014

Court : Delhi

(III) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6081/2014 and CM No.14789/2014 ... Petitioner GREEN FINANCE PVT. LTD. versus ... Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N.S. Vasisht, Mr M.P. Bhargava, Mr Vishal Singh and Ms Jyoti Kataria For the Respondents : Mr Pawan Mathur with Mr Himanshu Gupta for R-3/DDA Mr Yeeshu Jain and Mr Siddharth Panda for R-4 & 5 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Awa...
Nov 03 2014

Vishnu Hiranand Kirpalani Vs. Union of India & Ors

  • Decided on : 03-Nov-2014

Court : Delhi

36(I) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6002/2014 & CM146462014 VISHNU HIRANAND KIRPALANI ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N. S. Vasisht with Mr M. P. Bhargava, Mr Vishal Singh and Ms Jyoti Kataria For the Respondents : Mr Pawan Mathur for R-3/DDA. Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for R-4&5/L&B & LAC. Mr Vikas Mahajan with Mr Rohan Gupta and Ms S. S. Rai for R-1 & 2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated und...
Oct 31 2014

Riyaz Khan @ Gainda Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

  • Decided on : 31-Oct-2014

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : October 31, 2014 + CRL.A. 299/2012 RIYAZ KHAN @ GAINDA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Manoj Singh with Mr. Abhay Singh, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp. Naresh Kumar, Insp. Spl. Staff (North). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Believing the testimony of Suresh Kumar PW-1 and accepting that the knife Ex.P-2 was got recovered pursuant to the disclosure statement made by appellant Riyaz Khan, which knife when sent for the opinion of Dr.Vijay Dhankar PW-22 was opined as capable of inflicting the three injuries on deceased Sunil and additionally capable of causing the cut marks on a vest and a shirt worn by the deceased when he was assaulted, the learned trial Judge has opined vide impugned judgment dated December 14, 2010 that the prosecution has successfully established that Riyaz K...
Oct 31 2014

Smt Lovika Jain Vs. The Principal, Delhi Public School & Ors.

  • Decided on : 31-Oct-2014

Court : Delhi

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA882014 SMT LOVIKA JAIN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Ayush Arora, Advocates. versus % THE PRINCIPAL, DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS.. Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.1 and 2. Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER3110.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 9th October 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant seeking direction for accepting his resignation effective from 31.7.2009 and to grant salary for the period from 17th May 2009 to 31st July 2009. Mr. R.K. Saini, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the learned Single Judge failed to appreciate the fact that the acceptance of the appellants resignation by the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 with effect from ...
Oct 31 2014

Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi Vs. Menon Associates

  • Decided on : 31-Oct-2014

Court : Delhi

$~29. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE No.93/2014 Date of decision:31. t October, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, NEW DELHI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Advocate. versus MENON ASSOCIATES ..... Respondent Through Mr. J.K.Mittal & Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The Commissioner of Service Tax has filed the present appeal under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against order dated 2nd January, 2014 passed in appeal No.ST/1402/2011 by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT, for short).2. Decisions of the CESTAT can be challenged under Section 35G the Central Excise Act, 1944 before the jurisdictional High Court and before the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944, but the Supreme Court and the jurisdictional High Court do not enjoy con...
Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //