Skip to content


Search Tools ▼

Recent Judgments Home > Search > Court: Uttaranchal > Page 2 of about 1,392 results (0.006 seconds)

Apr 23 2014 (TRI)

The Manager State Bank of India Dharampur Vs. R.P. Kandwal, Dehradun

Court : Uttaranchal - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) - Dehradun

C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 08.04.2013 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun in consumer complaint No. 248 of 2012, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and has directed the opposite party to restore the full pension of the complainant w.e.f. 01.08.2011 and also to pay him a sum of Rs. 20,000/- as compensation for mental agony and litigation expenses within a month from the date of the order, failing which the total amount shall carry interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing the consumer complaint till actual payment. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainant “ Sh. R.P. Kandwal is a retired Central Governments employee, who retired from the service on 31.07.1996. He had commuted a part of his pension at the time of retirement, which was to be restored after 15 years, i.e. on 31.07.2011, but the State Bank of India, Dharampur Branch, Dehradun (in short œBank?) “ o...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2014 (TRI)

Anoop Radwal, Chamoli (Uttarakhand) Vs. Chairman Tulaâandeuro;andtrad ...

Court : Uttaranchal - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) - Dehradun

C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.04.2012 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun, whereby the District Forum has dismissed the consumer complaint No.73 of 2011. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainant“Sh. Anoop Radwal took admission in the second year of Mechanical Engineering on 10.07.2010 in Tulas Institute, Dhoolkot, Chakrata Road, Dehradun“opposite party under lateral entry system and deposited a sum of Rs. 81,128/- against tuition fee and Rs. 12,000/- under other heads on 12.08.2010. However, after attending few classes, the complainant felt that the academic atmosphere of the institute was not proper and also there was no safety of personal belongings. As such, he decided to leave the institute and asked the authorities of the institute to refund the fee. On 29.12.2010, the complainants father Sh. S.L. Radwal also came to the institute and requested the Director of the institute to refund the fee...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2014 (TRI)

Chief Manager Punjab National Bank Clock Tower Branch, Dehradun Vs. Ja ...

Court : Uttaranchal - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) - Dehradun

C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26.11.2012 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun, allowing the consumer complaint No. 34 of 2012 and directing the opposite party to pay to the complainant an interest @ 9% per annum on Rs. 20,000/- for the period from 24.06.2011 to 26.09.2011 and Rs. 9,500/- towards penalty and also to pay to the complainant a sum of Rs. 5,100/- towards litigation expenses, within a month (30 days) from the date of the order. 2. In brief, the facts of the case are that Sh. Prakash Prateek, son of the complainant-Sh. Jai Prakash Lal, has a saving bank account with Punjab National Bank, Clock Tower Branch, Dehradun-opposite party. On 23.06.2011, Sh. Prakash Prateek went to the Banks ATM for remitting a fee of Rs. 20,000/- payable to IIT, from his saving bank account by using ATM (Master Card), but the ATM system showed that œBank declined payment?. When he again attempted to remit the money a new message was shown by the system...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2014 (TRI)

United India Insurance Company Limited, Through Its Divisional Manager ...

Court : Uttaranchal - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) - Dehradun

B.C. Kandpal, President: 1. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed against the order dated 15.05.2010 passed by the District Forum, Tehri Garhwal in consumer complaint No. 04 of 2009, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and directed the appellant “ insurance company to pay compensation of Rs.65,401/- to the respondent “ complainant; Rs.2,000/- towards special damages and Rs.2,000/- towards litigation expenses, in all, Rs.69,401/- within a month from the date of the order, failing which the above amount was directed to carry interest @7% p.a. from the date of filing of the consumer complaint till payment. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that the complainant is the registered owner of vehicle No. UP07-K-9803. The said vehicle was insured with the appellant “ United India Insurance Company Limited for the period from 15.10.2007 to 14.10.2008 for sum of ...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2014 (TRI)

Classic Group of Hotels a Unit of New Age Hotel and Resorts Limited, N ...

Court : Uttaranchal - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) - Dehradun

B.C. Kandpal, President: 1. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed against the order dated 16.09.2008 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar in consumer complaint No. 222 of 2007, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and directed the appellants “ opposite parties to refund the amount of Rs. 40,000/- to the respondents “ complainants together with interest @9% p.a. pendente lite and future; Rs. 20,000/- towards mental agony and Rs. 2,000/- towards litigation expenses. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that the complainants became the members of the Special Holiday Scheme floated by the opposite parties and entered into an agreement with the authorised representative of the opposite party No. 2 on 24.04.2005. The complainants deposited a sum of Rs. 40,000/- towards Membership Fee. In the year 2005, the complainants applied with the opposite parties to Shimla To...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2014 (TRI)

Senior Superintendent Post Offices and Another Vs. Lavang Lata Sharma ...

Court : Uttaranchal - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) - Dehradun

C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.09.2013 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar, in consumer complaint No. 08 of 2013, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and has directed the Postal Department to pay to the complainants a sum of Rs. 1.00 lac, within a month from the date of the order. 2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the complainants“Smt. Lavang Lata Sharma and Sh. Navin Chandra Sharma had jointly opened a Term Deposit Account bearing No. 2224084 with the Sub-Post Office, Mayapur, Haridwar and deposited a sum of Rs. 50,000/- on 11.01.2005 for a period of two years. When the complainants submitted the pass-book to the Post Office on 03.02.2010, they were told that the maturity amount of the said term deposit account, amounting to Rs. 57,488/-, has been withdrawn on 13.03.2008 and the account has been closed. The complainants were shocked and made a lot of correspondence with different author...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Duncans Industries and Others Vs. Mrinal Kanti Das and Others

Court : Uttaranchal - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) - Dehradun

B.C. Kandpal, President (Oral): 1. This is an appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 19.11.2010 passed by the District Forum, Udham Singh Nagar in consumer complaint No. 107 of 2006. By the order impugned, the District Forum has ex-parte allowed the consumer complaint against the opposite parties and directed the opposite parties to pay sum of Rs.34,000/- to the complainant together with interest @14.50% from October, 2002 till payment; Rs.2,000/- towards mental agony and Rs.1,000/- towards litigation expenses. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that the complainant had deposited a sum of Rs.34,000/- with the opposite party No. 1 “ M/s Duncans Industries, Kolkata on 21.12.2000 for a period of three years under a fixed deposit scheme carrying interest @14.50% p.a. The interest was to be paid after every three months. The interest was paid to the complainant upto September, 2002, but the...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2014 (TRI)

Mohd. Irshad Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited, Through Divis ...

Court : Uttaranchal - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) - Dehradun

B.C. Kandpal, President: 1. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed by the complainant against the order dated 24.08.2012 passed by the District Forum, Nainital in consumer complaint No. 115 of 2010, whereby the District Forum has dismissed the consumer complaint filed by the complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that the complainant “ Mohd. Irshad was the registered owner of Tata Indica car No. UA04-D-8686. The said vehicle was insured with the opposite party “ United India Insurance Company Limited for the period from 15.01.2010 to 14.01.2011. On 21.01.2010, the insured vehicle met with an accident at Pangoot “ Kilbary Road, Nainital and got damaged to the extent of 75%. The complainant lodged the claim with the insurance company and completed all the formalities. The insurance company, however, vide their letter dated 07.07.2010 repudiated the claim of the complainan...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2014 (TRI)

Union of India Through Secretary, New Delhi and Another Vs. Dalvir Sin ...

Court : Uttaranchal - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) - Dehradun

B.C. Kandpal, President: 1. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed against the order dated 20.09.1999 passed by the District Forum, Pauri Garhwal in consumer complaint No. 56 of 1998, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and directed the opposite parties to immediately set right the telephone connection No. 3130 of the complainant and not to recover any amount from the complainant w.e.f. June, 1995 till the telephone is set right and the opposite parties were also directed to pay compensation of Rs. 5,000/- to the complainant together with interest @12% p.a. w.e.f. June, 1995 till payment and Rs. 1,000/- towards litigation expenses. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that the complainant is a medical practitioner and in the year 1994, he had taken telephone connection No. 3130 from the telecom department. The said telephone was working properly. However, in June, 1995, th...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 07 2014 (TRI)

Jagdish Chand Vs. Manager Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. a ...

Court : Uttaranchal - State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) - Dehradun

C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.04.2012 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun in consumer complaint No. 57 of 2010, whereby the District Forum has dismissed the consumer complaint. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that one Sh. Jagdish Chand had purchased a Health Plan Insurance Policy No. HW00040304000101 from Royal Sundram Alliance Company“opposite party No. 1 on 01.08.2007 for the period from 01.08.2007 to 31.07.2008 and paid a premium of Rs.2,529/-. The policy was duly renewed for next year for the period from 01.08.2008 to 31.07.2009. For the deposit of premium, a grace period of 15 was days allowed by the insurance company and, therefore, for the renewal of the said policy for the period from 01.08.2009 to 31.07.2010, the premium was sent by the complainant to opposite party No. 1 on 11.08.2009 through speed post from G.P.O., Dehradun “ opposite party No. 2. It is alleged that the Postal Department could not d...

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //