Skip to content


Options Dock ▼

Recent Judgments Home Search Court: Supreme Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 1,198 results (0.008 seconds)

Dec 18 2014 (SC)

Additional District and Sessions Judge, X Vs. Registrar General, High ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.792 OF2014Additional District and Sessions Judge 'X' ... Petitioner versus Registrar General, High Court of Madhya Pradesh and others ... Respondents JUDGMENT Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by a former Additional District and Sessions Judge of the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. The factual narration in the writ petition incorporates allegations of sexual harassment aimed at the petitioner, at the behest of a sitting Judge of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh (herein after referred to as, 'the High Court'), who has been impleaded by name as respondent no.3. The authenticity of the allegations levelled by the petitioner, which have been expressly disputed by respondent no.3, would stand affirmed or repudiated only after culmination of due process. Such being the sensitivity of the matter, it would be inappropriate to disclose the identity either of th...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2014 (SC)

Anil S/O Jagannath Rana and Ors. Vs. Rajendra S/O Radhakishan Rana and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11604 /2014 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.15314 of 2014]. Anil s/o Jagannath Rana and others ... Appellant (s) Versus Rajendra s/o Radhakishan Rana and others ... Respondent (s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.: Leave granted. Once a judicial authority takes a decision under Section 8(1) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") declining to refer the dispute pending before it to arbitration and the said decision having become final, whether either party to the proceedings can thereafter invoke the jurisdiction of the Chief Justice under Section 11(6) of the Act, is the question arising for consideration in this case. The scope of Section 8(3) of the Act is also an ancillary issue. Appellants are defendant nos. 1, 2, 3 in Special Suit No.211 of 2009 on the file of Civil Judge Senior Division at Aurangabad, Maharashtra. The suit is filed by a partnership firm, viz., M/...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2014 (SC)

Satendra Singh Vs. Vinod Kumar Bhalotia

Court : Supreme Court of India

"Non-reportable" IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.27519 of 2014 Satendra Singh .......Petitioner versus Vinod Kumar Bhalotia ......Respondent JUDGMENT Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.1. The petitioner before this Court, took on rent the shop in question, from the respondent-landlord, in the year 1979. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner, that after taking the shop on rent, the basic rental was enhanced from time to time. Finally, the rival parties executed an agreement dated 1.8.1981, whereby the shop in question, was rented by the respondent to the petitioner, for the period from August, 1981 to June, 1982. As the petitioner did not vacate the premises on the expiry of the period depicted in the rent agreement dated 1.8.1981, a suit for the eviction of the petitioner was filed by the respondent on 24.11.1982.2. In order to contest the suit filed by the respondent, the petitioner raised a variety of pleas. First...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2014 (SC)

State of U.P. and Ors. Vs. Parmanand Shukla (D) Thr. Lrs

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON- REPORTABLE [ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11525 OF2014(Arising out of S.L.P.(c) No.10968 of 2010) State of U.P. & Ors. ....Appellant(s) Versus Parmanand Shukla (Dead) Thr. L.Rs. ....Respondents(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre,J.1. Leave granted 2. This civil appeal is filed by the State of U.P. against the judgment dated 31.07.2009 passed by Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Special Appeal No.854 of 2009 which in turn arises out of judgment dated 24.01.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.2479 of 2001.3. By impugned judgment, the Division Bench dismissed the intra Court appeal filed by the State and in consequence affirmed the order of the learned Single Judge who had partly allowed the writ petition filed by the original respondent herein, since dead, and now represented by his legal representatives as respondent nos. 1 to 9 to continue the lis which was the subject matte...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2014 (SC)

State of Punjab and Ors. Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer)

Court : Supreme Court of India

"REPORTABLE" IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11527 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.11684 of 2012) State of Punjab and others etc. ... Appellants versus Rafiq Masih (White Washer) etc. ... Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.11528 OF2014[Arising out of SLP(C) No 35892 CC No.14663 of 2010]. CIVIL APPEAL No.11530 OF2014[Arising out of SLP(C) No.35914 .CC No.20144 of 2010]. CIVIL APPEAL No.11531 OF2014[Arising out of SLP(C) No.35916 CC No.9303 of 2011]. CIVIL APPEAL No.11532 OF2014[Arising out of SLP(C) No.35917 CC No.15876 of 2011]. CIVIL APPEAL No.11533 OF2014[Arising out of SLP(C) No.35919 CC No.16190 of 2011]. CIVIL APPEAL No.11534 OF2014[Arising out of SLP(C) No.35920 CC No.16303 of 2011]. CIVIL APPEAL No.11535 OF2014[Arising out of SLP(C) No.35921 CC No.16309 of 2011]. CIVIL APPEAL No.11536 OF2014[Arising out of SLP(C) No.35923 CC No.16325 of 2011]. CIVIL APPEAL No.11537 OF2014[Arising out of SLP(C) No.35924 CC No.16326 of 2011]. CIVIL APPEAL...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2014 (SC)

Banarsi Dass and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 534-535 OF2012Banarsi Dass and others ... Appellant (s) Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent (s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.: The appellants faced trial under Section 498A read with Section 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC'). The trial court acquitted them under Section 304B of IPC but convicted them under Section 498A of IPC. The State took up the matter in appeal before the High Court against the non-conviction under Section 304B of IPC. The High Court allowed the appeal and convicted them under Section 304B of IPC also. During the pendency of the appeal, appellant no.1-father- in-law of the deceased and appellant no.2-mother-in-law of the deceased expired. Therefore, the appeals survive only in respect of appellant No.2- husband of the deceased, appellant no.3-elder brother of the deceased and appellant no.4-younger brother of the deceased. T...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2014 (SC)

Kumod Kumar and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

"REPORTABLE" IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5874-5875 OF2009Kumod Kumar & another ... Appellants versus State of Jharkhand & others ... Respondents JUDGMENT Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.1. Consequent upon their selection, the appellants were inducted into the Police Department of the State of Bihar, by way of direct recruitment, as Steno Sub-Inspectors of Police. Appellant No.1 - Kumod Kumar was appointed as such on 10.4.1982. He joined his duties on 13.4.1982. Appellant No.2 - Ramesh Kumar was appointed on 11.9.1985, and he joined as such on 16.9.1985.2. On 26.8.1989 and 11.6.1991, the appellants were taken (on reversion) to the general line of the Police Department as Sub-Inspectors of Police. In this behalf it would be pertinent to mention, that induction into the general line of the Police Department from Steno Sub-Inspectors is permissible, subject to the satisfaction of the eligibility criteria, as also, consequent upon the selection and r...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2014 (SC)

Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.562 OF2012Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.274 OF2009Assam Public Works ...Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.876 OF2014All Assam Ahom Association & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. A Prophet is without honour in his own country. Substitute 'citizen' for 'prophet' and you will get the gist of the various writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India assailing Section 6A of the Citizenship Act.2. It all began when the Burmese ceded Assam to the British on 24th February, 1826 as per the treaty of Yandabo, thus bringing to an end Ahom rule in Assam which had begun sometime in the 13th century. The British annexed Assam and placed it as an administrative unit of the Bengal Province...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2014 (SC)

Raman Vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Lt. and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11466 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.8113 OF2014 RAMAN .........APPELLANT Vs. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.& ORS. .........RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant, represented through his natural guardian father - Manoj Kumar, has filed this appeal questioning the judgment and order dated 30.10.2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in the Letters Patent Appeal No.1631 of 2013 in Civil Writ Petition No.14046 of 2012.3. The brief facts are stated herein: The appellant, a four year old boy was electrocuted on 03.11.2011 by coming in direct contact with the naked electric wire lying open on the roof of his house. Immediately after the incident, the boy was taken for first aid to a nearby R.M. Anand Hospital in Panipat, Haryana from where he was referred to Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak. The final...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2014 (SC)

International Amusement Limited Vs. India Trade Promotion Organization ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11474 OF2014(Arising Out of SLP (C) No.13982 of 2007) International Amusement Limited .........APPELLANT Vs. India Trade Promotion Organisation & Anr. .........RESPONDENTS With CIVIL APPEAL NO.11475 OF2014(Arising Out of SLP (C) No.13983 of 2007) JUDGMENT V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.Leave granted. These appeals are directed by the appellant against the common impugned judgment and order dated 16.07.2007 passed in writ petition (c) No.2015 of 2001 and C.M. (M) No.553/2007 by the High Court of Delhi, urging various facts and legal grounds and raising two substantial questions of law which read thus:- Whether the arbitration proceedings can be continued between the International Amusement Limited and the India Trade Promotion Organisation?. b) Whether the Estate Officer appointed as Arbitrator is the correct forum?. Necessary brief facts are stated hereunder with a view to find out whether the questions of law fra...

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //