Skip to content


Linnabery Vs. Iowa - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number368 U.S. 143
AppellantLinnabery
Respondentiowa
Excerpt:
.....a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 368 u.s. 143, 144 union cartage co. v. united states, 368 u.s. 143 (1961) 368 u.s. 143 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court union cartage co. v. united states, 368 u.s. 143 (1961) 368 u.s. 143 union cartage co. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of massachusetts. no. 448. decided december 4, 1961. 193 f. supp. 645, affirmed. earl r. stanley for appellant. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, richard a. solomon and robert w. ginnane for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice black and mr. justice brennan are.....
Judgment:
LINNABERY v. IOWA - 368 U.S. 143 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court LINNABERY v. IOWA, 368 U.S. 143 (1961) 368 U.S. 143

LINNABERY ET AL. v. IOWA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 26, Misc.
Decided December 4, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellants pro se.

Evan Hultman, Attorney General of Iowa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 143, 144


UNION CARTAGE CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100000"> 368 U.S. 143 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 143 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court UNION CARTAGE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 143 (1961) 368 U.S. 143

UNION CARTAGE CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 448.
Decided December 4, 1961.

193 F. Supp. 645, affirmed.

Earl R. Stanley for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon and Robert W. Ginnane for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //