Skip to content


Bowne Vs. Utah - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number368 U.S. 144
AppellantBowne
RespondentUtah
Excerpt:
bowne v. utah - 368 u.s. 144 (1961) u.s. supreme court bowne v. utah, 368 u.s. 144 (1961) 368 u.s. 144 bowne v. utah. appeal from the supreme court of utah. no. 169, misc. decided december 4, 1961. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 11 utah 2d 95, 355 p.2d 689. george h. searle for appellant. walter l. budge, attorney general of utah, and ronald n. boyce, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. post v. boles, 368 u.s. 144 (1961) 368 u.s. 144 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court post v. boles, 368 u.s. 144 (1961) 368 u.s. 144 .....
Judgment:
BOWNE v. UTAH - 368 U.S. 144 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court BOWNE v. UTAH, 368 U.S. 144 (1961) 368 U.S. 144

BOWNE v. UTAH.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH.
No. 169, Misc.
Decided December 4, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 Utah 2d 95, 355 P.2d 689.

George H. Searle for appellant.

Walter L. Budge, Attorney General of Utah, and Ronald N. Boyce, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


POST v. BOLES, <a href="/100001"> 368 U.S. 144 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 144 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court POST v. BOLES, 368 U.S. 144 (1961) 368 U.S. 144

POST v. BOLES, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 319, Misc.
Decided December 4, 1961.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Claude A. Joyce and George H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for a hearing in the light of Uveges v. Pennsylvania, 335 U.S. 437 , and Herman v. Claudy, 350 U.S. 116 .

Page 368 U.S. 144, 145




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //