Skip to content


Mclemore Vs. Mississippi - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number368 U.S. 70
AppellantMclemore
RespondentMississippi
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of mississippi. no. 410. decided november 20, 1961. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 241 miss. 664, 125 so.2d 86, 126 so.2d 236. w. e. gore, sr. for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. fruhling v. amalgamated housing corp., 368 u.s. 70 (1961) 368 u.s. 70 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court fruhling v. amalgamated housing corp., 368 u.s. 70 (1961) 368 u.s. 70 fruhling v. amalgamated housing corp. et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 419. decided november 20, 1961. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial.....
Judgment:
McLEMORE v. MISSISSIPPI - 368 U.S. 70 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court McLEMORE v. MISSISSIPPI, 368 U.S. 70 (1961) 368 U.S. 70

McLEMORE v. MISSISSIPPI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 410.
Decided November 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 241 Miss. 664, 125 So.2d 86, 126 So.2d 236.

W. E. Gore, Sr. for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


FRUHLING v. AMALGAMATED HOUSING CORP., <a href="/100004"> 368 U.S. 70 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 70 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court FRUHLING v. AMALGAMATED HOUSING CORP., 368 U.S. 70 (1961) 368 U.S. 70

FRUHLING v. AMALGAMATED HOUSING CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 419.
Decided November 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 9 N. Y. 2d 541, 175 N. E. 2d 156.

Samuel B. Waterman for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 368 U.S. 70, 71




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //