Skip to content


Cummings Vs. Huiskamp - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number368 U.S. 30
AppellantCummings
RespondentHuiskamp
Excerpt:
.....u.s. 30 cummings v. huiskamp, judge, lee county district court, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of iowa. no. 511, misc. decided november 6, 1961. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. page 368 u.s. 30, 31 department of revenue v. united states, 368 u.s. 30 (1961) 368 u.s. 30 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court department of revenue v. united states, 368 u.s. 30 (1961) 368 u.s. 30 department of revenue of illinois et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 245. decided november 6, 1961. judgment vacated and case remanded. reported below: 191 f. supp. 723. william g......
Judgment:
CUMMINGS v. HUISKAMP - 368 U.S. 30 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court CUMMINGS v. HUISKAMP, 368 U.S. 30 (1961) 368 U.S. 30

CUMMINGS v. HUISKAMP, JUDGE, LEE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF IOWA. No. 511, Misc.
Decided November 6, 1961.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 368 U.S. 30, 31


DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100010"> 368 U.S. 30 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 30 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 30 (1961) 368 U.S. 30

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF ILLINOIS. No. 245.
Decided November 6, 1961.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 191 F. Supp. 723.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and A. Zola Groves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox and John H. Caruthers for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

In the light of the representations of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the judgment of the District Court is vacated. The case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in the light of developments which have occurred since the injunction was issued, without prejudice to consideration by that court of any application by appellees for such temporary equitable relief as they may request pending the further proceedings hereby ordered.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //