Skip to content


Chobot Vs. Wisconsin - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number368 U.S. 15
AppellantChobot
RespondentWisconsin
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of wisconsin. no. 146. decided october 23, 1961. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 12 wis. 2d 110, 106 n. w. 2d 286. max raskin for appellant. john w. reynolds, attorney general of wisconsin, william platz, assistant attorney general, and william j. mccauley for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice black, mr. justice douglas and mr. justice harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. katz v. singerman, 368 u.s. 15 (1961) 368 u.s. 15 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court katz v. singerman, 368 u.s. 15 (1961) .....
Judgment:
CHOBOT v. WISCONSIN - 368 U.S. 15 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court CHOBOT v. WISCONSIN, 368 U.S. 15 (1961) 368 U.S. 15

CHOBOT v. WISCONSIN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 146.
Decided October 23, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 12 Wis. 2d 110, 106 N. W. 2d 286.

Max Raskin for appellant.

John W. Reynolds, Attorney General of Wisconsin, William Platz, Assistant Attorney General, and William J. McCauley for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


KATZ v. SINGERMAN, <a href="/100015"> 368 U.S. 15 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 15 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court KATZ v. SINGERMAN, 368 U.S. 15 (1961) 368 U.S. 15

KATZ ET AL v. SINGERMAN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 298.
Decided October 23, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 241 La. 103, 127 So.2d 515.

G. Wray Gill and Gerard H. Schreiber for appellants.

Robert Weinstein and Herman L. Midlo for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 15, 16




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //