Skip to content


Riley Vs. Pennsylvania Reading Seashore Lines - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number368 U.S. 11
AppellantRiley
RespondentPennsylvania Reading Seashore Lines
Excerpt:
.....for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 368 u.s. 11, 12 gremillion v. united states, 368 u.s. 11 (1961) 368 u.s. 11 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court gremillion v. united states, 368 u.s. 11 (1961) 368 u.s. 11 gremillion et al. v. united states. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of louisiana. no. 200. decided october 16, 1961. 194 f. supp. 182, affirmed. jack p. f. gremillion, attorney general of louisiana, carroll buck, first assistant attorney general, and m. e. culligan and george m. ponder, assistant attorneys general, for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general marshall and harold h. greene for the united states. per curiam. the.....
Judgment:
RILEY v. PENNSYLVANIA READING SEASHORE LINES - 368 U.S. 11 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court RILEY v. PENNSYLVANIA READING SEASHORE LINES, 368 U.S. 11 (1961) 368 U.S. 11

RILEY v. PENNSYLVANIA READING SEASHORE LINES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 427, Misc.
Decided October 16, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Thomas Raeburn White, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 11, 12


GREMILLION v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100020"> 368 U.S. 11 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 11 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court GREMILLION v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 11 (1961) 368 U.S. 11

GREMILLION ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF LOUISIANA. No. 200.
Decided October 16, 1961.

194 F. Supp. 182, affirmed.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, Carroll Buck, First Assistant Attorney General, and M. E. Culligan and George M. Ponder, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //