Skip to content


Ableman Vs. City of Cedar Rapids - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number368 U.S. 3
AppellantAbleman
RespondentCity of Cedar Rapids
Excerpt:
.....rapids. appeal from the supreme court of iowa. no. 246. decided october 9, 1961. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 252 iowa 948, 108 n. w. 2d 253. ernest f. pence and roy a. golden for appellants. c. w. garberson and william m. dallas for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 368 u.s. 3, 4 security-1st nat. bk., los angeles v. franchise tax bd., 368 u.s. 3 (1961) 368 u.s. 3 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court security-1st nat. bk., los angeles v. franchise tax bd., 368 u.s. 3 (1961) 368 u.s. 3 security-first national bank of los angeles et al. v. franchise tax.....
Judgment:
ABLEMAN v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS - 368 U.S. 3 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court ABLEMAN v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, 368 U.S. 3 (1961) 368 U.S. 3

ABLEMAN ET AL. v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 246.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 252 Iowa 948, 108 N. W. 2d 253.

Ernest F. Pence and Roy A. Golden for appellants.

C. W. Garberson and William M. Dallas for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 368 U.S. 3, 4


SECURITY-1ST NAT. BK., LOS ANGELES v. FRANCHISE TAX BD., <a href="/100026"> 368 U.S. 3 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 3 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court SECURITY-1ST NAT. BK., LOS ANGELES v. FRANCHISE TAX BD., 368 U.S. 3 (1961) 368 U.S. 3

SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES ET AL. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 122.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 55 Cal. 2d 407, 359 P.2d 625.

Pierce Works, Warren M. Christopher, Hugo A. Steinmeyer, Richard E. Sherwood and Brenton L. Metzler for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, James E. Sabine, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //