Skip to content


Genco Vs. Genco - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number368 U.S. 6
AppellantGenco
RespondentGenco
Excerpt:
.....of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 368 u.s. 6, 7 dillner transfer co. v. united states, 368 u.s. 6 (1961) 368 u.s. 6 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court dillner transfer co. v. united states, 368 u.s. 6 (1961) 368 u.s. 6 dillner transfer co. et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of pennsylvania. no. 188. decided october 9, 1961. 193 f. supp. 823, affirmed. ernie adamson for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, richard a. solomon, robert w. ginnane and fritz r. kahn for the united states et al. carl helmetag, jr. for the pennsylvania railroad co., and herbert baker, john c. bradley and roland rice for.....
Judgment:
GENCO v. GENCO - 368 U.S. 6 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court GENCO v. GENCO, 368 U.S. 6 (1961) 368 U.S. 6

GENCO v. GENCO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 277, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 171 Ohio St. 450, 172 N. E. 2d 9.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 6, 7


DILLNER TRANSFER CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100029"> 368 U.S. 6 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 6 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court DILLNER TRANSFER CO. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 6 (1961) 368 U.S. 6

DILLNER TRANSFER CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 188.
Decided October 9, 1961.

193 F. Supp. 823, affirmed.

Ernie Adamson for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

Carl Helmetag, Jr. for the Pennsylvania Railroad Co., and Herbert Baker, John C. Bradley and Roland Rice for Continental Transportation Lines, Inc., et al., intervenors.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //