Skip to content


Bargaintown Vs. Whitman - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number367 U.S. 903
AppellantBargaintown
RespondentWhitman
Excerpt:
.....76. decided june 19, 1961. ___ f. supp. ___, affirmed. david g. bress and leonard braman for appellants. anne x. alpern, attorney general of pennsylvania, and harry j. rubin for appellees. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. mcgowan v. maryland, 366 u.s. 420 , and two guys from harrison-allentown, inc., v. mcginley, 366 u.s. 582 . mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. beck v. maine, 367 u.s. 903 (1961) 367 u.s. 903 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court beck v. maine, 367 u.s. 903 (1961) 367 u.s. 903 beck v. maine. appeal from the supreme judicial court of maine. no. 899. decided june 19, 1961. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial.....
Judgment:
BARGAINTOWN v. WHITMAN - 367 U.S. 903 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court BARGAINTOWN v. WHITMAN, 367 U.S. 903 (1961) 367 U.S. 903

BARGAINTOWN, U.S. A., INC., ET AL. v. WHITMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY
OF LEBANON COUNTY PA., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 76.
Decided June 19, 1961.

___ F. Supp. ___, affirmed.

David G. Bress and Leonard Braman for appellants.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Harry J. Rubin for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 , and Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc., v. McGinley, 366 U.S. 582 .

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


BECK v. MAINE, <a href="/100044"> 367 U.S. 903 </a> (1961) 367 U.S. 903 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court BECK v. MAINE, 367 U.S. 903 (1961) 367 U.S. 903

BECK v. MAINE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE.
No. 899.
Decided June 19, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 156 Me. 403, 165 A. 2d 433.

A. Raymond Rogers for appellant.

Frank E. Hancock, Attorney General of Maine, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 367 U.S. 903, 904




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //