Skip to content


Carolina Amusement Co. Vs. Martin - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number367 U.S. 904
AppellantCarolina Amusement Co.
RespondentMartin
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of south carolina. no. 424. decided june 19, 1961. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 236 s. c. 558, 115 s. e. 2d 273. j. d. todd, jr. and chester d. ward, jr. for appellants. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice douglas and mr. justice brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. birdwell v. kirkland, 367 u.s. 904 (1961) 367 u.s. 904 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court birdwell v. kirkland, 367 u.s. 904 (1961) 367 u.s. 904 birdwell et al. v. kirkland et al. appeal from the court of civil appeals of texas,.....
Judgment:
CAROLINA AMUSEMENT CO. v. MARTIN - 367 U.S. 904 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court CAROLINA AMUSEMENT CO. v. MARTIN, 367 U.S. 904 (1961) 367 U.S. 904

CAROLINA AMUSEMENT CO. ET AL. v. MARTIN, SHERIFF, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 424.
Decided June 19, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 236 S. C. 558, 115 S. E. 2d 273.

J. D. Todd, Jr. and Chester D. Ward, Jr. for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


BIRDWELL v. KIRKLAND, <a href="/100045"> 367 U.S. 904 </a> (1961) 367 U.S. 904 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court BIRDWELL v. KIRKLAND, 367 U.S. 904 (1961) 367 U.S. 904

BIRDWELL ET AL. v. KIRKLAND ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, SECOND SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 914.
Decided June 19, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 337 S. W. 2d 120.

Sidney E. Dawson and Townes Loring Dawson for appellants.

G. D. Hinson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 367 U.S. 904, 905




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //