Skip to content


Broughton Vs. Ohio - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number367 U.S. 905
AppellantBroughton
RespondentOhio
Excerpt:
.....v. ohio. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 554. decided june 19, 1961. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 171 ohio st. 261, 168 n. e. 2d 744. robert l. merritt for appellant. jack g. day filed a brief for ohio civil liberties union, as amicus curiae, in support of appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. weisberg v. ohio, 367 u.s. 905 (1961) 367 u.s. 905 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court weisberg v. ohio, 367 u.s. 905 (1961) 367 u.s. 905 weisberg v. ohio. appeal from the.....
Judgment:
BROUGHTON v. OHIO - 367 U.S. 905 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court BROUGHTON v. OHIO, 367 U.S. 905 (1961) 367 U.S. 905

BROUGHTON v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 554.
Decided June 19, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 171 Ohio St. 261, 168 N. E. 2d 744.

Robert L. Merritt for appellant.

Jack G. Day filed a brief for Ohio Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


WEISBERG v. OHIO, <a href="/100046"> 367 U.S. 905 </a> (1961) 367 U.S. 905 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court WEISBERG v. OHIO, 367 U.S. 905 (1961) 367 U.S. 905

WEISBERG v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 808.
Decided June 19, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 171 Ohio St. 302, 170 N. E. 2d 432.

H. H. Felsman for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 367 U.S. 905, 906




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //