Skip to content


Trubek Vs. Ullman - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number367 U.S. 907
AppellantTrubek
RespondentUllman
Excerpt:
trubek v. ullman - 367 u.s. 907 (1961) u.s. supreme court trubek v. ullman, 367 u.s. 907 (1961) 367 u.s. 907 trubek et al. v. ullman, state's attorney. appeal from the supreme court of errors of connecticut. no. 847. decided june 19, 1961. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 147 conn. 633, 165 a. 2d 158. fowler v. harper for appellants. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice douglas, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. tugwell v. bush, 367 u.s. 907 (1961) 367 u.s. 907 (1961) "> u.s. supreme.....
Judgment:
TRUBEK v. ULLMAN - 367 U.S. 907 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court TRUBEK v. ULLMAN, 367 U.S. 907 (1961) 367 U.S. 907

TRUBEK ET AL. v. ULLMAN, STATE'S ATTORNEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 847.
Decided June 19, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 147 Conn. 633, 165 A. 2d 158.

Fowler V. Harper for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


TUGWELL v. BUSH, <a href="/100048"> 367 U.S. 907 </a> (1961) 367 U.S. 907 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court TUGWELL v. BUSH, 367 U.S. 907 (1961) 367 U.S. 907

TUGWELL, TREASURER OF LOUISIANA, ET AL. v. BUSH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 1037.
Decided June 19, 1961.

194 F. Supp. 182, affirmed.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, Carroll Buck, First Assistant Attorney General, and M. E. Culligan, George M. Ponder, Weldon A. Cousins, L. K. Clement, John M. Currier, George S. Hesni, Robert S. Link, Jr., Dorothy N. Wolbrette, John E. Jackson, Jr., William P. Schuler and Henry J. Roberts, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

Thurgood Marshall for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Page 367 U.S. 907, 908




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //