Skip to content


Giant Tiger Drugs Vs. Ohio - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number366 U.S. 762
AppellantGiant Tiger Drugs
RespondentOhio
Excerpt:
giant tiger drugs v. ohio - 366 u.s. 762 (1961) u.s. supreme court giant tiger drugs v. ohio, 366 u.s. 762 (1961) 366 u.s. 762 giant tiger drugs, inc., v. ohio. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 807. decided june 5, 1961. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 171 ohio st. 294, 170 n. e. 2d 71. h. h. felsman for appellant. john f. ray, jr. for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 366 u.s. 762, 763
Judgment:
GIANT TIGER DRUGS v. OHIO - 366 U.S. 762 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court GIANT TIGER DRUGS v. OHIO, 366 U.S. 762 (1961) 366 U.S. 762

GIANT TIGER DRUGS, INC., v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 807.
Decided June 5, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 171 Ohio St. 294, 170 N. E. 2d 71.

H. H. Felsman for appellant.

John F. Ray, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 366 U.S. 762, 763




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //