Skip to content


Simcox Vs. Madigan - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number366 U.S. 765
AppellantSimcox
RespondentMadigan
Excerpt:
simcox v. madigan - 366 u.s. 765 (1961) u.s. supreme court simcox v. madigan, 366 u.s. 765 (1961) 366 u.s. 765 simcox v. madigan, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 699, misc. decided june 5, 1961. certiorari granted; judgment reversed; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. solicitor general cox, acting assistant attorney general doar, harold h. greene and david rubin for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing as suggested by the solicitor general. ellis v. united states, 356 u.s. 674 . page 366.....
Judgment:
SIMCOX v. MADIGAN - 366 U.S. 765 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court SIMCOX v. MADIGAN, 366 U.S. 765 (1961) 366 U.S. 765

SIMCOX v. MADIGAN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 699, Misc.
Decided June 5, 1961.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Doar, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing as suggested by the Solicitor General. Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674 .

Page 366 U.S. 765, 1




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //