Skip to content


HerrIn Transportation Co. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number366 U.S. 419
AppellantHerrIn Transportation Co.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
herrin transportation co. v. united states - 366 u.s. 419 (1961) u.s. supreme court herrin transportation co. v. united states, 366 u.s. 419 (1961) 366 u.s. 419 herrin transportation co. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of texas. no. 837. decided may 22, 1961. 186 f. supp. 777, affirmed. carl l. phinney for appellant. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, richard a. solomon, robert w. ginnane and james y. piper for the united states, and ewell h. muse, jr. for strickland transportation co., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 366 u.s. 419, 420
Judgment:
HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES - 366 U.S. 419 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES, 366 U.S. 419 (1961) 366 U.S. 419

HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 837.
Decided May 22, 1961.

186 F. Supp. 777, affirmed.

Carl L. Phinney for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and James Y. Piper for the United States, and Ewell H. Muse, Jr. for Strickland Transportation Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 366 U.S. 419, 420




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //