Skip to content


Atchley Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number366 U.S. 207
AppellantAtchley
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....366 u.s. 207 atchley v. california. certiorari to the supreme court of california. no. 95. argued april 25, 1961. decided may 1, 1961. certiorari dismissed as not warranted on record. reported below: 53 cal. 2d 160, 346 p.2d 764. rosalie s. asher argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. doris h. maier, deputy attorney general of california, argued the cause for respondent. with her on the briefs was stanley mosk, attorney general of california. per curiam. after hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. accordingly, the writ is dismissed. page 366 u.s. 207, 208
Judgment:
ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA - 366 U.S. 207 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA, 366 U.S. 207 (1961) 366 U.S. 207

ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 95.
Argued April 25, 1961.
Decided May 1, 1961.

Certiorari dismissed as not warranted on record.

Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 160, 346 P.2d 764.

Rosalie S. Asher argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the briefs was Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California.

PER CURIAM.

After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.

Page 366 U.S. 207, 208




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //