Skip to content


Boyden Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number365 U.S. 650
AppellantBoyden
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....650 (1961) 365 u.s. 650 boyden v. california. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 344, misc. decided april 3, 1961. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 181 cal. app. 2d 48, 4 cal. rptr. 869. petitioner pro se. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, william e. james, assistant attorney general, and david r. caldwell, deputy attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 365 u.s. 650, 651
Judgment:
BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA - 365 U.S. 650 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA, 365 U.S. 650 (1961) 365 U.S. 650

BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 344, Misc.
Decided April 3, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 181 Cal. App. 2d 48, 4 Cal. Rptr. 869.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and David R. Caldwell, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 365 U.S. 650, 651




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //