Skip to content


Jerrold Electronics Corp. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number365 U.S. 567
AppellantJerrold Electronics Corp.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
jerrold electronics corp. v. united states - 365 u.s. 567 (1961) u.s. supreme court jerrold electronics corp. v. united states, 365 u.s. 567 (1961) 365 u.s. 567 jerrold electronics corp. et al. v. united states. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of pennsylvania. no. 631. decided march 20, 1961. 187 f. supp. 545, affirmed. israel packel for appellants. solicitor general cox, acting assistant attorney general kirkpatrick and richard a. solomon for the united states. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. points 1 and 3, northern pacific r. co. v. united states, 356 u.s. 1 ; international salt co. v. united states, 332 u.s. 392 . points 2 and 6,.....
Judgment:
JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. v. UNITED STATES - 365 U.S. 567 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 567 (1961) 365 U.S. 567

JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 631.
Decided March 20, 1961.

187 F. Supp. 545, affirmed.

Israel Packel for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kirkpatrick and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Points 1 and 3, Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1 ; International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392 . Points 2 and 6, United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 633 . Point 4, Schine Theatres v. United States, 334 U.S. 110, 119 .


LOUISIANA v. WALKER, <a href="/100150"> 365 U.S. 567 </a> (1961) 365 U.S. 567 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court LOUISIANA v. WALKER, 365 U.S. 567 (1961) 365 U.S. 567

LOUISIANA EX REL. ALLEN v. WALKER, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 655, Misc.
Decided March 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed because notice thereof was not filed within statutory period.

Jack N. Rogers and Robert H. Reiter for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the notice thereof was not filed within the time provided by law.

Page 365 U.S. 567, 568




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //