Skip to content


Turpentine and RosIn Factors, Inc. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number365 U.S. 298
AppellantTurpentine and RosIn Factors, Inc.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
turpentine & rosin factors, inc. v. united states - 365 u.s. 298 (1961) u.s. supreme court turpentine & rosin factors, inc. v. united states, 365 u.s. 298 (1961) 365 u.s. 298 turpentine & rosin factors, inc., v. united states. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of georgia. no. 556. decided february 20, 1961. 192 f. supp. 256, affirmed. e. way highsmith and j. h. highsmith for appellant. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general bicks and richard a. solomon for the united states. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. national psychological ass'n v. univ. of new york, 365 u.s. 298 (1961) 365 u.s. 298 (1961) "> u.s......
Judgment:
TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES - 365 U.S. 298 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 298 (1961) 365 U.S. 298

TURPENTINE & ROSIN FACTORS, INC., v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA. No. 556.
Decided February 20, 1961.

192 F. Supp. 256, affirmed.

E. Way Highsmith and J. H. Highsmith for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASS'N v. UNIV. OF NEW YORK, <a href="/100177"> 365 U.S. 298 </a> (1961) 365 U.S. 298 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASS'N v. UNIV. OF NEW YORK, 365 U.S. 298 (1961) 365 U.S. 298

NATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHOANALYSIS, INC., ET AL. v.
UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 568.
Decided February 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 8 N. Y. 2d 197, 168 N. E. 2d 649.

Lyman Stansky for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Philip Watson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 365 U.S. 298, 299




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //