Skip to content


Snyder Vs. Town of Newtown - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number365 U.S. 299
AppellantSnyder
RespondentTown of Newtown
Excerpt:
.....from the supreme court of errors of connecticut. no. 580. decided february 20, 1961. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 147 conn. 374, 161 a. 2d 770. philip reich for appellants. james j. o'connell and albert l. coles for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice frankfurter and mr. justice douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. cordak v. reuben h. donnelley corp., 365 u.s. 299 (1961) 365 u.s. 299 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court cordak v. reuben h. donnelley corp., 365 u.s. 299 (1961) 365 u.s. 299 cordak, doing business as a. b......
Judgment:
SNYDER v. TOWN OF NEWTOWN - 365 U.S. 299 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court SNYDER v. TOWN OF NEWTOWN, 365 U.S. 299 (1961) 365 U.S. 299

SNYDER ET AL. v. TOWN OF NEWTOWN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 580.
Decided February 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 147 Conn. 374, 161 A. 2d 770.

Philip Reich for appellants.

James J. O'Connell and Albert L. Coles for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


CORDAK v. REUBEN H. DONNELLEY CORP., <a href="/100178"> 365 U.S. 299 </a> (1961) 365 U.S. 299 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court CORDAK v. REUBEN H. DONNELLEY CORP., 365 U.S. 299 (1961) 365 U.S. 299

CORDAK, DOING BUSINESS AS A. B. DENTAL PLATE LABORATORY, ET AL. v. REUBEN
H. DONNELLEY CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 582.
Decided February 20, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 20 Ill. 2d 153, 169 N. E. 2d 321.

John Paul Stevens for appellants.

Owen Rall for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 365 U.S. 299, 300




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //