Skip to content


Denver Chicago Transport Co., Inc. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number364 U.S. 627
AppellantDenver Chicago Transport Co., Inc.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
denver chicago transport co., inc. v. united states - 364 u.s. 627 (1961) u.s. supreme court denver chicago transport co., inc. v. united states, 364 u.s. 627 (1961) 364 u.s. 627 denver chicago transport co., inc., v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of colorado. no. 503. decided january 9, 1961. 183 f. supp. 785, affirmed. thomas f. kilroy for appellant. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general bicks, richard a. solomon, robert w. ginnane and francis a. silver for the united states and the interstate commerce commission. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. oregon-nevada-california fast freight v. stewart, 364 u.s......
Judgment:
DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES - 364 U.S. 627 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627 (1961) 364 U.S. 627

DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 503.
Decided January 9, 1961.

183 F. Supp. 785, affirmed.

Thomas F. Kilroy for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, <a href="/100196"> 364 U.S. 627 </a> (1961) 364 U.S. 627 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, 364 U.S. 627 (1961) 364 U.S. 627

OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT, INC., v. STEWART ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 521.
Decided January 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 223 Ore. 314, 353 P.2d 541.

Ferris F. Boothe for appellant.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Alfred B. Thomas and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 627, 628




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //