Skip to content


National Motor Freight Vs. U.S. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number371 U.S. 223
AppellantNational Motor Freight
RespondentU.S.
Excerpt:
national motor freight v. u.s. - 371 u.s. 223 (1962) u.s. supreme court national motor freight v. u.s., 371 u.s. 223 (1962) 371 u.s. 223 national motor freight traffic association, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. no. 479. decided december 17, 1962. 205 f. supp. 592, affirmed. bryce rea, jr. and frederick a. babson, jr. for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, robert b. hummel, robert w. ginnane and fritz r. kahn for the united states and the interstate commerce commission. d. robert thomas, harry c. ames, sr., giles morrow, s. sidney eisen and james l. givan for appellee freight forwarders. per curiam. the.....
Judgment:
NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT v. U.S. - 371 U.S. 223 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT v. U.S., 371 U.S. 223 (1962) 371 U.S. 223

NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 479.
Decided December 17, 1962.

205 F. Supp. 592, affirmed.

Bryce Rea, Jr. and Frederick A. Babson, Jr. for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

D. Robert Thomas, Harry C. Ames, Sr., Giles Morrow, S. Sidney Eisen and James L. Givan for appellee freight forwarders.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 371 U.S. 223, 224




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //