Skip to content


Ahoyian Vs. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number371 U.S. 186
AppellantAhoyian
RespondentMassachusetts Turnpike Authority
Excerpt:
.....371 u.s. 186 ahoyian et al. v. massachusetts turnpike authority et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of massachusetts. no. 473. decided december 3, 1962. 211 f. supp. 668, affirmed. j. fleet cowden for appellants. edward o. proctor, arthur e. sutherland and kevin hern for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. napier v. united states, 371 u.s. 186 (1962) 371 u.s. 186 (1962) "> u.s. supreme court napier v. united states, 371 u.s. 186 (1962) 371 u.s. 186 napier v. united states et al. appeal from the united states court of appeals for the third circuit. no. 452, misc. decided december 3, 1962. appeal.....
Judgment:
AHOYIAN v. MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY - 371 U.S. 186 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court AHOYIAN v. MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, 371 U.S. 186 (1962) 371 U.S. 186

AHOYIAN ET AL. v. MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 473.
Decided December 3, 1962.

211 F. Supp. 668, affirmed.

J. Fleet Cowden for appellants.

Edward O. Proctor, Arthur E. Sutherland and Kevin Hern for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


NAPIER v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100227"> 371 U.S. 186 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 186 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court NAPIER v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 186 (1962) 371 U.S. 186

NAPIER v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.
No. 452, Misc.
Decided December 3, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 298 F.2d 445 .

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 371 U.S. 186, 187




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //