Skip to content


Gluckstern Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number371 U.S. 69
AppellantGluckstern
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
.....federal question. page 371 u.s. 69, 70 chicago & eastern illinois railroad v. united states, 371 u.s. 69 (1962) 371 u.s. 69 (1962) "> u.s. supreme court chicago & eastern illinois railroad v. united states, 371 u.s. 69 (1962) 371 u.s. 69 chicago & eastern illinois railroad co. et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 360. decided november 5, 1962. frank f. vesper for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, robert b. hummel, irwin a. seibel, robert w. ginnane and fritz r. kahn for the united states et al. william j. o'brien, jr., richard j. murphy and robert h. bierma for rail carrier appellees. .....
Judgment:
GLUCKSTERN v. NEW YORK - 371 U.S. 69 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court GLUCKSTERN v. NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 69 (1962) 371 U.S. 69

GLUCKSTERN v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 564, Misc.
Decided November 5, 1962.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 371 U.S. 69, 70


CHICAGO & EASTERN ILLINOIS RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100240"> 371 U.S. 69 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 69 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court CHICAGO & EASTERN ILLINOIS RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 69 (1962) 371 U.S. 69

CHICAGO & EASTERN ILLINOIS RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 360.
Decided November 5, 1962.

Frank F. Vesper for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

William J. O'Brien, Jr., Richard J. Murphy and Robert H. Bierma for rail carrier appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would note probable jurisdiction.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //