Skip to content


Geer, Executor, Vs. Bowers - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number371 U.S. 36
AppellantGeer, Executor,
RespondentBowers
Excerpt:
.....was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. consolidated rock products co. v. city of los angeles, 371 u.s. 36 (1962) 371 u.s. 36 (1962) "> u.s. supreme court consolidated rock products co. v. city of los angeles, 371 u.s. 36 (1962) 371 u.s. 36 consolidated rock products co. et al. v. city of los angeles. appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 307. decided october 22, 1962. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 57 cal. 2d 515, 370 p.2d 342. howard c. westwood for appellants. roger arnebergh and bourke jones for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial.....
Judgment:
GEER, EXECUTOR, v. BOWERS - 371 U.S. 36 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court GEER, EXECUTOR, v. BOWERS, 371 U.S. 36 (1962) 371 U.S. 36

GEER, EXECUTOR, ET AL. v. BOWERS, TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 304.
Decided October 22, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 264, 181 N. E. 2d 268.

H. Herschel Hunt for appellants.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Theodore R. Saker and Joseph L. White, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


CONSOLIDATED ROCK PRODUCTS CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, <a href="/100245"> 371 U.S. 36 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 36 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court CONSOLIDATED ROCK PRODUCTS CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 371 U.S. 36 (1962) 371 U.S. 36

CONSOLIDATED ROCK PRODUCTS CO. ET AL. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 307.
Decided October 22, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 57 Cal. 2d 515, 370 P.2d 342.

Howard C. Westwood for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh and Bourke Jones for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 371 U.S. 36, 37




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //