Skip to content


United States Vs. Department of Revenue of Illinois - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number371 U.S. 21
AppellantUnited States
RespondentDepartment of Revenue of Illinois
Excerpt:
..... per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. southeastern aviation, inc., v. hurd, administrator, 371 u.s. 21 (1962) 371 u.s. 21 (1962) "> u.s. supreme court southeastern aviation, inc., v. hurd, administrator, 371 u.s. 21 (1962) 371 u.s. 21 southeastern aviation, inc., doing business as southeast airlines, v. hurd. administrator. appeal from the supreme court of tennessee, eastern division. no. 286. decided october 15, 1962. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 209 tenn. 639, 355 s. w. 2d 436. russell r. kramer and erma griffith greenwood for appellant. howard e. wilson and preston h. taylor for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted.....
Judgment:
UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS - 371 U.S. 21 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS, 371 U.S. 21 (1962) 371 U.S. 21

UNITED STATES ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 235.
Decided October 15, 1962.

202 F. Supp. 757, affirmed.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, I. Henry Kutz and William Massar for the United States.

John H. Caruthers for Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.


SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., v. HURD, ADMINISTRATOR, <a href="/100248"> 371 U.S. 21 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 21 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., v. HURD, ADMINISTRATOR, 371 U.S. 21 (1962) 371 U.S. 21

SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SOUTHEAST AIRLINES,
v. HURD. ADMINISTRATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE, EASTERN DIVISION. No. 286.
Decided October 15, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 209 Tenn. 639, 355 S. W. 2d 436.

Russell R. Kramer and Erma Griffith Greenwood for appellant.

Howard E. Wilson and Preston H. Taylor for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 371 U.S. 21, 22




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //