Skip to content


Wassermann Vs. Board of Regents, University of New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number371 U.S. 23
AppellantWassermann
RespondentBoard of Regents, University of New York
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 312. decided october 15, 1962. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 11 n. y. 2d 173, 182 n. e. 2d 264. jacob rassner for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. miller v. lake, 371 u.s. 23 (1962) 371 u.s. 23 (1962) "> u.s. supreme court miller v. lake, 371 u.s. 23 (1962) 371 u.s. 23 miller v. lake, secretary of state of texas. appeal from the supreme court of texas. no. 415. decided october 15, 1962. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. john j. herrera for appellant. will wilson, attorney general of texas, and william.....
Judgment:
WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK - 371 U.S. 23 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, 371 U.S. 23 (1962) 371 U.S. 23

WASSERMANN v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 312.
Decided October 15, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 N. Y. 2d 173, 182 N. E. 2d 264.

Jacob Rassner for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


MILLER v. LAKE, <a href="/100250"> 371 U.S. 23 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 23 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court MILLER v. LAKE, 371 U.S. 23 (1962) 371 U.S. 23

MILLER v. LAKE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 415.
Decided October 15, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

John J. Herrera for appellant.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and William E. Allen and H. Grady Chandler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 371 U.S. 23, 24




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //