Skip to content


Fulghum Vs. Louisiana - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number371 U.S. 5
AppellantFulghum
RespondentLouisiana
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of louisiana. no. 244, misc. decided october 8, 1962. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 242 la. 767, 138 so.2d 569. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 371 u.s. 5, 6 fairview public utility dist. no. 1 v. city of anchorage, 371 u.s. 5 (1962) 371 u.s. 5 (1962) "> u.s. supreme court fairview public utility dist. no. 1 v. city of anchorage, 371 u.s. 5 (1962) 371 u.s. 5 fairview public utility district number one et al. v. city of anchorage. appeal from the supreme court of alaska. no. 223. .....
Judgment:
FULGHUM v. LOUISIANA - 371 U.S. 5 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court FULGHUM v. LOUISIANA, 371 U.S. 5 (1962) 371 U.S. 5

FULGHUM v. LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 244, Misc.
Decided October 8, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 242 La. 767, 138 So.2d 569.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 371 U.S. 5, 6


FAIRVIEW PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 v. CITY OF ANCHORAGE, <a href="/100259"> 371 U.S. 5 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 5 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court FAIRVIEW PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 v. CITY OF ANCHORAGE, 371 U.S. 5 (1962) 371 U.S. 5

FAIRVIEW PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER ONE ET AL. v.
CITY OF ANCHORAGE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA. No. 223.
Decided October 8, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: ___ Alaska ___, 368 P.2d 540.

George E. C. Hayes for appellants.

Charles S. Rhyne for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //