Skip to content


Elchuk Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number370 U.S. 722
AppellantElchuk
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
elchuk v. united states - 370 u.s. 722 (1962) u.s. supreme court elchuk v. united states, 370 u.s. 722 (1962) 370 u.s. 722 elchuk v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. no. 965, misc. decided june 25, 1962. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for further procedings. reported below: 296 f.2d 723 . petitioner pro se. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general miller and beatrice rosenberg for the united states. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. upon the suggestion of the solicitor general and an examination of the entire record, the judgment.....
Judgment:
ELCHUK v. UNITED STATES - 370 U.S. 722 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court ELCHUK v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 722 (1962) 370 U.S. 722

ELCHUK v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 965, Misc.
Decided June 25, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for further procedings.

Reported below: 296 F.2d 723 .

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. Upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General and an examination of the entire record, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in which the petitioner is to be accorded the opportunity to present oral argument on the merits of his appeal, either personally or through counsel, to the same extent as such opportunity is accorded to the United States Attorney.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 370 U.S. 722, 723




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //