Skip to content


Creek Nation Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number370 U.S. 157
AppellantCreek Nation
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
creek nation v. united states - 370 u.s. 157 (1962) u.s. supreme court creek nation v. united states, 370 u.s. 157 (1962) 370 u.s. 157 creek nation v. united states. certiorari to the court of claims. no. 124. argued april 24, 1962. decided june 4, 1962. judgment affirmed by an equally divided court. reported below: 152 ct. cl. 747. paul m. niebell argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. ralph a. barney argued the cause for the united states. with him on the briefs were solicitor general cox, richard j. medalie, roger p. marquis and hugh nugent. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. mr. justice frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. .....
Judgment:
CREEK NATION v. UNITED STATES - 370 U.S. 157 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court CREEK NATION v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 157 (1962) 370 U.S. 157

CREEK NATION v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS.
No. 124.
Argued April 24, 1962.
Decided June 4, 1962.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Reported below: 152 Ct. Cl. 747.

Paul M. Niebell argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Ralph A. Barney argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Richard J. Medalie, Roger P. Marquis and Hugh Nugent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


HOLDEN v. PIONEER BROADCASTING CO., <a href="/100319"> 370 U.S. 157 </a> (1962) 370 U.S. 157 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court HOLDEN v. PIONEER BROADCASTING CO., 370 U.S. 157 (1962) 370 U.S. 157

HOLDEN v. PIONEER BROADCASTING CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 1092, Misc.
Decided June 4, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 228 Ore. 405, 365 P.2d 845.

Dale A. Rader and Robert F. Maguire for appellant.

Clarence J. Young for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 370 U.S. 157, 158




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //