Skip to content


Simpson Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number369 U.S. 526
AppellantSimpson
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
simpson v. united states - 369 u.s. 526 (1962) u.s. supreme court simpson v. united states, 369 u.s. 526 (1962) 369 u.s. 526 simpson, doing business as mid-seven transportation co., v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of iowa. no. 748. decided april 30, 1962. 200 f. supp. 372, affirmed. d.c. nolan for appellant. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, lionel kestenbaum, robert w. ginnane and francis a. silver for the united states and the interstate commerce commission, appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. the chief justice and mr. justice douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction.....
Judgment:
SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES - 369 U.S. 526 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 526 (1962) 369 U.S. 526

SIMPSON, DOING BUSINESS AS MID-SEVEN TRANSPORTATION CO., v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 748.
Decided April 30, 1962.

200 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.

D.C. Nolan for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 526, 527




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //